11-30-2016, 09:42 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
APC and IFV are not synonymous.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
11-30-2016, 09:50 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Dec 2015
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
|
11-30-2016, 10:01 PM | #13 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
No, APCs are basically survivable trucks, IFVs are designed to actually get into fights.
|
11-30-2016, 10:06 PM | #14 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
While armor apparently isn't the formal definition of the difference, IFVs often have considerably more armor, including some solidly into the tank range (though I only know of one case with MBT-grade protection).
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
11-30-2016, 10:59 PM | #15 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
APCs tend to carry more troops with lighter support weapons, often without a main turret; IFVs carry fewer troops on average but have heavier support weapons, often on a main turret. Armor varies by nationality and manufacturer, but IFVs tend to have better armor.
An APC will often carry 10-15 soldiers plus their gear, with a crew of 2, and armed with an exposed mount machine gun for protection. IFVs carry 6-9 soldiers, a crew of 3-5, and will mount anything from a 30mm chaingun up to a 90mm tank gun or a set of recoilless rifles/missiles for offense. A good comparison is the M113 APC vs the M2 Bradley IFV, though the Bradleys tend to be pretty light on armor (for various reasons including but not limited to being designed by committee).
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
11-30-2016, 11:31 PM | #16 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
Quote:
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
12-01-2016, 01:01 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
Yeah all this is about a range of effect not hard and fast APC armour beats Rifles all the time. rules of thumb.
If nothing else you have to look at what these things were designed for The BRDM is a scout vehicle designed to operate out and about in the countryside, see something and bug out before it gets into a fight (hence all it's DR up front for initial contact only) But you look at the up-armoured Humvee this is a patrol vehicle that came about after having operated in built up areas were opponents could pop out at close range and at 360 degrees. So it has DR40 sides and rear as well. Because it's designed to do a different job. Armour is heavy unless you have the luxury of over engineering you put just enough to do what you want most of the time. Which is also why the BRDM is only 1.7 tons heaver than the Humvee even though it's also got a turret, machine guns, considerably more range, being the bigger vehicle and predates it by 35 years. Then of course we're only looking at the effect of 5.56mm assult rifles against the DR 5d6 will on average be 17.5 damage so on average will not get through, and will only beat DR20 22% of the time (I agree armour as dice gives a good result here) so yeah on a lucky roll some will get through it's true. But what effect will it have? Against an Unliving target so against the BRDM itself pi is 1/3 damage so even if you roll really well you're not going to get that much effect. Against occupants, it gets odd as GURPS has two ways to effect occupants. 1). You treat the hit as per normal after it get past the DR20 so pretty much any armour will keep them safe and/or the wound will be pretty insignificant unless they get really unlucky 2). the rules for knock on effect on occupants means you have to do at least 5 points of penetrating damage to the vehicle to maybe inflict 1d cut on an occupant's random location. Which means you have to be rolling 25+ damage initially, which is actually only 3.4% chance on 5d. And even then again most body armour will absorb 1d cut. But yep sitting in a DR20 armoured car won't keep you completely safe on a battlefield even against small arms, but it will protect you massively compared to not having it. Therefore it will increase you longevity against small arms enough to hopefully do your job. The thing is putting enough armour to completely protect you against small arms will make you slow and big (and being big makes you even slower), which means you more likely to get tagged by something worse and you will not have enough DR to protect you against that! Armoured cars (and those in them) survive by shrugging off small bullets and frag, and not being hit by larger stuff Last edited by Tomsdad; 12-01-2016 at 06:39 AM. |
12-01-2016, 01:12 AM | #18 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
The terminology does tell you something -- they are actually, in principle, intended for different purposes:
APC stands for Armored Personnel Carrier -- it's something designed to carry troops around, that has armor. IFV stands for Infantry Fighting Vehicle -- it's something designed to carry troops around and also fight. Thus, IFVs are expected to have more fighting power than APCs, which generally means better armor and weapons. Of course, you have the occasional misnomer, and oddities such as the Merkava (which is typically classed as an MBT, but can in fact carry 6 infantry as well as its crew). Incidentally, Light Armored Vehicle doesn't necessarily mean an infantry carrier at all, though it often does. Last edited by Anthony; 12-01-2016 at 01:18 AM. |
12-01-2016, 03:13 AM | #19 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Light Armored Vehicle DR
There's also the wider issue of the context of the fight in question.
Lets take the worse scenario imaginable for our BDRM against a bunch of chaps with M16s. It's driven into a built up area and is surrounded (so can't use it superior manoeuvrability or keep that DR40 pointed against the incoming fire) Yes in theory those chaps can eventually plink this thing to death with 5.56 5d pi. But don't forget while they are doing this, it's firing back with either 7.62x54mmR or even 14.5x114mm! |
Tags |
damage resistance, guns, high tech, penetration, vehicles |
|
|