|
10-16-2013, 04:30 PM | #1 |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
SpaceShips missiles attack rules
Forgive me, I know this has been asked before, but finding it seems to be beyond me:
In spaceships, is the targeting between missiles and guns the same? It seems to be, but that makes no sense. shouldn't missiles reduce range, ahem, relative velocity penalties? And is there a reason you don't use both range AND relative velocity? If I've matched vector with you, shooting you should still be harder if you're far away.
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
10-16-2013, 05:08 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
"Bullets" are just missiles that get most of their delta-V in the barrel. They still have thrusters and attitude adjusters, which means they are effectively Homing/Guided, just like missiles. That's why you don't worry about range.
Of course, Spaceships then goes off and assumes you're taking -30 in range penalties to get the final sAcc... but I digress. |
10-16-2013, 05:33 PM | #3 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
The relative velocity penalty is not a range penalty, it's a penalty for the closing speed that your munition needs to cope with while pulling off an intercept.
Quote:
Though without it, one must wonder how the guns can possibly manage to have negative sAcc.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
10-16-2013, 05:54 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
Quote:
The penalty might just be due to the fact that it's really, really hard to hit something at space ranges with something that has fairly low delta-v (like a "bullet"). |
|
10-16-2013, 06:28 PM | #5 |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
so when they say "bullet", they are describing a missile that doesn't pack enough fuel to dodge around, or do anything other than adjust for ship course changes. That could be a LOT clearer. Not to mention it makes bullets much less generic. So whats the big difference then? the size of the attack?
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
10-16-2013, 06:54 PM | #6 | |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
Quote:
|
|
10-16-2013, 08:05 PM | #7 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: SpaceShips missiles attack rules
Quote:
Quote:
At the earliest possible point (p28) it indicates: "guns fire shell packages with small thrusters and guidance systems for limited course correction." On page 59: "Guns, missile launchers, and ramming spacecraft all use these rules. Since the attacker is steering or homing on the target, range modifiers are irrelevant – what matters is the relative velocity." What more do you want it to say? Unguided bullets are completely nonsensical at Spaceships ranges unless they're fired at ridiculously high speeds. Cosmic grav guns could maybe be used with dumb bullets, but only at short ranges. The big difference: cannons are awful, missiles are really really good. Shells are much cheaper and lighter than missiles and not prone to unwantedly blowing up your entire ship (presumably because they don't need the main propulsion), and you can have RF and VRF mounts for guns, but none of those facts are all that useful because guns are terrible.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|