08-20-2019, 09:51 AM | #51 |
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
But they did do the descriptions and should have known what the illustration looked like.
The description should have read thusly: Longsword: a two handed sword generally with a straight double-edged blade weighing 2 to 3 lb (there are exceptions like the Katana). "Bastard sword" is a term that originally meant 'irregular sword or sword of uncertain origin' but in the early 20th century came to mean "a hand and half sword" and is applied to swords between a one handed arming sword and two handed longsword and generally regard as a subclass of the Longsword. Historically the term was applied varies type of swords including one handed swords with longer then "normal" blades. |
08-20-2019, 10:01 AM | #52 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Yes. In 3e (and earlier) "U" meant "Unbalanced" and such a weapon became Unready after being used to attack or parry.
Unless you had a ST 5 pts above mimimum. So the ST 12 Axe became the weapon of choice for ST17 Barbarians. You didn't often see Axes below that ST though. It was also clear that magic weapons with the Quick Draw Enchantment never became Unready. Now nothing but DF Dwarves Ethnic Kewlness overcomes 0U status.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
08-20-2019, 10:11 AM | #53 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
Quote:
got to ask though what's an irregular sword or a sword of uncertain origin? ;-)
__________________
Grand High* Poobah of the Cult of Stat Normalisation. *not too high of course |
||
08-20-2019, 10:13 AM | #54 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
__________________
Grand High* Poobah of the Cult of Stat Normalisation. *not too high of course |
|
08-20-2019, 12:44 PM | #55 | |
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
The term "bastard sword" was ill defined until the 19th century. In fact, different experts before the 19th century would call the exact same sword a longsword or a bastard sword based on totally arbitrary criteria. The really sad thing is Nick Evangelista's The Encyclopedia of the Sword via Greenwood Publishing Group ("educational and academic publisher which is today part of ABC-CLIO" ie one of the reliable sources for wikipedia references) would have fixed much of this nonsense. Evangelista's book came out in 1995, Low Tech for 3e GURPS came out in 2001 with a reprint in 2004. The 4e version came out in 2010. Last edited by maximara; 08-20-2019 at 12:52 PM. |
|
08-20-2019, 12:47 PM | #56 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
My guess is that the testers either didn't encounter it in their games (no super strong characters wielding an otherwise unbalanced melee weapon), out of habit just assumed that it worked like in 3E when they did have to use it or they used it and thought it worked fine.
|
08-21-2019, 01:40 AM | #57 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
We think those nation's only ever produced one identifiable type of sword throughout the entire time frame of bastard and long swords, or even just at the time that reference was written about? (sorry that's a rhetorical question, the quote is taken from it's own context that informs it's meaning, i.e. I'm sure the authors know what they meant by French sword and Spanish sword at the time, but broadening that out to the more general subject here is not easy) More importantly what's not any of those things, since that is what's actually being described as a bastard sword? I.e. what is a bastard sword, not what is it not? So yep I agree ill defined is exactly right, I think you quote supports that very well, and I also agree experts used long sword and bastard sword almost interchangeably. However what that means is that a book written in 1995 is not suddenly going to rediscover the precise definition of these things though history, because these things didn't have them. It is at best a way after the events re-sorting and categorisation of things. And yeah OK that's cool, even useful. But no its not some retroactive this is how things were More relevantly it doesn't matter for the issues you raise about LT, LT does describe what it's defining and give stats accordingly. Out of interest what are the precise and one assumes distinct and mutually exclusive definition's of long sword and bastard sword given by The Encyclopedia of the Sword (that presumably are counter to the descriptions in LT?)
__________________
Grand High* Poobah of the Cult of Stat Normalisation. *not too high of course Last edited by Tomsdad; 08-21-2019 at 02:45 AM. |
|
08-21-2019, 03:12 PM | #58 | |
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
Bastard Sword (pg 48): "also known as the hand and a half sword, the bastard sword was a long, straight-bladed weapon dating from 1490, with a plain cross guard, long grip, and rounded pommel. Blades averages forty inches in length, but some were as long as fifty inches." This works to 4.17 to 5 feet long. "The term bastard undoubtedly comes from the fact that the sword has, because of its design, no legitimate claim to being classified as either a single-handed or two-handed weapon" (Charles Henry Ashdown (1967) European Arms & Armor; George Cameron Stone (1961) A Glossary of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor: in All Countries and in All Times, reprinted as part of the Dover Military History, Weapons, Armor series in 1999) Long Sword (pg 364): "The long sword was of the two handed variety. It was invariable a cutting weapon and was always, because of its length and weight used on foot. Blades of these weapons often reached five feet and more in length. The long sword family includes the claymore, the spandon, the espadon, the zweyhander, and the flamberge" (Egerton Castle (1885) Schools and Masters of Fence: From the Middle Ages to the Eighteenth Century) Last edited by maximara; 08-22-2019 at 05:32 AM. |
|
08-21-2019, 09:45 PM | #59 | |
World's Worst Detective
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
To put another band-aid on the problem, you could mess around with PK's technique from MyGURPS.
Quote:
And it would be interesting to couple this with the old 3e rule that I had never heard of before (about minST+5 canceling out the "U"). Maybe every point of ST above minST reduces that penalty by -1. So, that ends up being minST+3 (i.e., ST 14) to cancel out the "U". That seems a little low, but the bastard sword is still a balanced weapon. So, if I were to extrapolate, maybe, for other unbalanced weapons (e.g., axes, maces, etc.), every two points of ST above minST reduces that penalty by -1. So, that means minST+6 cancels out the "U", which is pretty close to the 3e rule of minST+5. Just going with my gut, I think that sounds like a great compromise for the bastard sword and a good compromise for unbalanced weapons in general. (Also, I'd definitely switch the names of the longsword and the bastard sword—it makes enough sense to me! Watching these YouTube videos has made me an instant expert. Just add water!)
__________________
Raekai's links: My blog about conlanging, GURPS, and other stuff! — Using Knowing Your Own Strength with Conditional Injury Simulating multiple attacks Wildcard Power Pool: a flexible magic/powers system Magic to RPM complete conversion v2 (incomplete) Perussinexian Magic 2 (outdated) |
|
08-22-2019, 06:01 AM | #60 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Why does Bastard Sword have a U in parry in 1 hand?
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|