|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-22-2017, 03:41 PM | #1 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Which book is more accurate? Extra words I have to add to make it more than I wrote in the first sentence .
|
09-22-2017, 03:58 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Assuming you're comparing to GT:First In, Space 4th edition is basically a version update.
It's reasonably clear that our models for the formation of planetary systems were wrong, so the rules for generating the planets in a system are wrong. Once the planets are generated, figuring out habitability/etc hasn't really had much new data, so it's held up well enough. |
09-22-2017, 04:23 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Could you elaborate on the details of this? I'm curious to hear about which parts have been superseded by more recent discoveries.
__________________
For GURPS reviews and Psi-Wars inspired content, check out my blog at Libris Ludorum! |
09-22-2017, 04:27 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
There's a lot of gas giant movement, apparently. It's more accurate to say "our models were wrong" than to say we know what's right.
|
09-22-2017, 05:02 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Well, while the system is designed to primarily provide a Sol-type system, that's at least partially because that's the kind of system that people would place their habitable colony worlds they develop.
Plus, Sol is not the only system laid out in a "conventional" model; Epsilon Eridani has two confirmed asteroid belts and a Kuiper belt, with a confirmed gas giant just outside the inner asteroid belt. There's a very good chance there's another gas giant just outside the outer asteroid belt, and I would not be surprised if there were three or more terrestrial planets inside the inner asteroid belt. And then there's TRAPPIST-1 with six inner terrestrial planets (though I've not read anything about it having outer gas giants). So our own solar system is not alone in being a "conventional" layout in the universe. Mind, the system might need some math updates to pull off TRAPPIST-1, due to the six planets being so near to the star and so close to each other. There are probably more out there, and I'm sure our own detection methods are skewing the bell curve to the weird stuff we can't yet explain because the super-close planets are easier to detect during transit. I should also note that the system in 4e Space is capable of pulling off most of the systems we've detected so far; I recall it being stated that the system was altered from the earlier versions of Space because of the detection of hyper-close gas giants.
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
09-22-2017, 06:51 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Castle, PA (north of Pittsburgh)
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Sol-like systems are out there.
But, you could come up with interesting things to do in space with a system that has a Hot Jupiter. Good place for pirates to hide, if there are no useful worlds (if you're doing a more space-opera sort of thing where space pirates can be a thing). Also, a Jupiter-mass planet in the liquid water zone could have a Ganymede-sized moon with happy life tooling around on it, or human colonies. |
09-23-2017, 07:30 AM | #7 | |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: How has the science in Gurps Space 4th edition & Gurps Traveller held up?
Quote:
We don't have anything to replace it yet, but this decade is proving to be the golden age of exoplanet research. I'd say we anticipate having much better theories and data soon, rather than that we've proved the given system wrong. We're still rapidly pushing the envelope on what we can and can't detect, so this is entirely the wrong time to write a new system.
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
|
|
|