Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-02-2015, 02:30 PM   #11
Captain Joy
 
Captain Joy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
Default Re: Mitigating Disadvantages w/o Self Control Number

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eukie View Post
Self-control rolls are against 6, 9, 12, and 15. We can extend this sequence to cover the range 0-3-6-9-12-15-18-21 with each step costing 50% of the base cost. Hence, rolling against a self-control number of 18 is worth 0 points, while the guaranteed failure of rolling less than 0 is worth x3 the usual cost.

If a disadvantage applies all the time, you might then assume that it has a self-control number of 0, and an effective triple cost. If it gave 30 points, giving it a self-control number of 12 would reduce it's value to 10 points.
I get want you're saying, but since a 3, 4, 17, and 18 are automatics or criticals, maybe the effective sequence is closer to never-6-9-12-15-always.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno View Post
GURPS Zombies adds a "Constantly" level to self control, which gives you the baseline point cost for an always-on mental disad that you can then back-form the price for a 12-minus Self Control version to apply Self Control modifiers to normally. Spoiler: it'll end up pretty cheap compared to the always-on version, potentially approaching the quirk but with more complicated mechanics.
Disadvantages With A Self-Control Number
  • You resist never (N/A – 0% of the time): 2.5 x listed cost. (GURPS Zombies, p. 60)
  • You resist quite rarely (roll of 6 or less – 9.3% of the time): 2 x listed cost. (B121)
  • You resist fairly often (roll of 9 or less – 37.5% of the time): 1.5 x listed cost. (B121)
  • You resist quite often (roll of 12 or less – 74.1% of the time): 1 x listed cost. (B121)
  • You resist almost all the time (roll of 15 or less – 95.4% of the time): 0.5 x listed cost. (B121)
  • You resist always (100% of the time): 0 cost. (obviously)

So Zombies added the 2.5 x cost mechanic to Disadvantages in order to make resistible mental Disadvantages not resistible. Why not apply the same metric to not resistible mental Disadvantages to give them a Self-Control number? Seriously, I'm asking; if this is not a good idea, let me know why.

Disadvantages Without A Self-Control Number
  • You resist never (N/A – 0% of the time): 1 x listed cost.
  • You resist quite rarely (roll of 6 or less – 9.3% of the time): 0.8 x listed cost.
  • You resist fairly often (roll of 9 or less – 37.5% of the time): 0.6 x listed cost.
  • You resist quite often (roll of 12 or less – 74.1% of the time): 0.4 x listed cost.
  • You resist almost all the time (roll of 15 or less – 95.4% of the time): 0.2 x listed cost.
  • You resist always (100% of the time): 0 cost. (common sense)

Last edited by Captain Joy; 07-02-2015 at 03:25 PM. Reason: added link, spelling, fixed roll numbers, added %'s
Captain Joy is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
disadvantages, rules question, self-control number


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.