12-23-2010, 03:50 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Spain —Europe
|
Re: DF and adventures
Personally, I'd prefer independent adventures. If there is a link between them, it think that it should be entirely optional.
To be able to pick an adventure without having the feeling of missing something is a valuable thing. Besides, independent adventures are easier to drop into already existing campaigns, which is great.
__________________
"Let's face it: for some people, roleplaying is a serious challenge, a life-or-death struggle." J. M. Caparula/Scott Haring "Physics is basic but inessential." Wolfgang Smith My G+ Last edited by demonsbane; 12-23-2010 at 03:58 PM. |
12-31-2010, 09:10 PM | #12 | |
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Saskatchewan, a place colder than Siberia
|
Re: DF Adventure Series
Quote:
I also feel that it would be a good way for writers to introduce new monsters and foes to the DF line without necessarily having to create enough to fill out a large supplement. I'm looking forward to TBC's adventure and plan on releasing it the day it is posted on e23.
__________________
...you're a disappointment to me. You've spoiled the keenness of your mind by wallowing in sentimentality... You are an idealist - and I pity you as I would the village idiot. |
|
01-02-2011, 02:52 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Re: DF and adventures
I'm actually working on a "super-adventure" right now.
If you've read the D&D 4e DMG, you'll be familiar with what a super-adventure is, skip this paragraph. Basically, a super-adventure is when a series of plot hooks, sub-plots and dungeons are set around a single location, which is all contained in a single module/book. Keep on the Borderlands? Classic super-adventure. Maybe the team might do something like that for an adventure PDF?
__________________
My blog: http://tabletoprpg333.home.blog |
Tags |
adventures, dungeon fantasy |
|
|