06-07-2015, 07:27 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Gadget limiations and other limitations
I have an interesting question about gadget limitations on advantages that are already limited.
Lets take the example of Iron Man (In theory he could also be done by making his suit an ally, and that would be my desired approach since the suit by itself seems to get almost as much screen time as tony stark does, has a fully intelligent AI loaded within it, and in theory if fighting someone with 'combat time' hacking abilities could be attacked mentally, but for this exercise lets go with the PC building iron man is doing so via a pure advantage). Iron man suit (SM 0, DR 60, can be stolen, does work for enemy, assorted other sundry problems) -80% Advantages covered by iron man suit: [275] DR 50 (+10% switchable [+80% hardened && Costs 10 energy+Limited duration -80%]) [75]HP +25 [75]Regeneration extreme (Costs 10 energy -50%) [75]Energy reserve 125 (Special recharge, Suit abilities only -80%) So lets say that all of the advantages inside the suit add up to 500 CP Now we apply the gadget limitation-80%: 100 points final cost for the Iron Man suit. Is this right? |
06-07-2015, 08:07 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chelyabinsk, Russia
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Actually, no. Gadget Limitation is just like any other limitation, not like Alternate Ability. So it stacks additively or multiplicatively (your choice) with any other modifiers on each trait.
And you can't add limitations to Meta-Traits which include other limited traits. However, with certain GM permission even such build is possible, see more in Power-Ups 8: Limitations.
__________________
MH Setting. Welcome to help. |
06-07-2015, 08:14 PM | #3 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Quote:
Some of those individual components look iffy too. I'd have to check the rules for the switchable/limited duration combo, it may be legal but I expect it reduces the duration to something utterly useless. And there's no *way* you are getting -80% for an energy reserve for suit abilities only. There's an argument to be made that limitations on what you can use an energy reserve for are always -0%, and I'm certainly not going to let you claim a big limitation for what is effectively "only on almost all of my powers".
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
06-07-2015, 10:55 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Quote:
Special recharge is -70% only for specific abilities is -10%, again RAW. |
|
06-07-2015, 11:17 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Quote:
It basically means that if you want suit/device power suites that are more complicated then 'gives you passive advantages' (IE- holding my gadget rifle gives me a 6d innate attack) your better off going the 'ally as gadget' route. |
|
06-08-2015, 11:54 AM | #6 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Except that an "Ally as Equipment" also has added issues, since they added in a requirement that if a Ally gives your character an ability, the character must still buy that ability with the "Granted by Familiar/Other" limitation.
So Iron Man would have to have Ally: Armor Innate Attack, Repulsor blasts, (Granted by familiar, -40%) Flight and Enhanced Move: Flight (Granted by familiar, -40%) etc etc etc, making that type of build most often useless. |
06-08-2015, 04:31 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lafayette, COlorado
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
You don't need granted by familiar - just give your ally Compartmentalized Mind (Controls) and Payload.
|
06-08-2015, 04:36 PM | #8 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
|
06-08-2015, 07:01 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Granted by familiar is for powers it gives to you. In the case of the suit, the power still belongs to the suit since the character uses the suit's powers, rather than receiving an independent iteration of the power.
|
06-08-2015, 07:11 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Gadget limiations and other limitations
Quote:
That seems to disagree with what you are saying here. |
|
Tags |
gadget, gadget limitation, stacking |
|
|