12-28-2016, 12:26 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
|
Star Trek Shuttles
I'm wondering what technology allows for shuttle take-off, landing, and maneuvering when close to the surface. And along those lines, what Piloting specialty would be most appropriate?
Is "Contragravity" the closest analogue? "Vertol" doesn't seem likely as there is no indication of "brute-force application of thrust". "Aerospace" seems a bit low tech for the way they seem to operate.
__________________
|
12-28-2016, 12:34 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
I could go with Contra Grav but Impulse might work as well. I dont recall it ever specifying what they use for power besides Impulse drives and if its different from space and on ground.
Star Trek clearly has grav tech, the only question is do they use it for this? What about those flight suits? I think they used grav belts.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
12-28-2016, 01:27 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
I'd have the shuttles and runabouts using Contragrav Lifters as one of their (probably mid-section) hull section units if I made them using Spaceships.
For specialties, I'd use Piloting (Aerospace) for shuttles. For runabouts I'd probably use (Aerospace) for transitioning between space and atmo; (Hyperspace) for traveling at warp speed; either (Contragrav), (Heavy Airplane), or (Light Airplane) for atmospheric operations, depending on their final mass, thrust, and handling; and (High-Performance Spacecraft) for operating on thrusters/impulse engines in space. Personally, in a lot of settings (Contragravity) can be too broad in application. Trek doesn't appear to be one of them, but I'm still wary of using it.
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
12-28-2016, 04:25 PM | #4 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
I don't ever remember any exhaust no matter how strongly a shuttle moved during flight or take off. Contragravity and/or "basic" reactionless drives are the only options I can imagine fitting.
Maybe the Contragravity only works either for thrust or for intertial dampening. That way you keep the shaking around during full power lift off, but not when cruising.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
12-28-2016, 04:35 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
Star Trek seems to have very weak contragrav. I tend to give Warp pseudovelocity and treat impulse as sub-warp (so also pseudo velocity). Impulse exhaust is more like car exhaust, not rocket exhaust.
So they can counter gravity, but it's less efficient than just zipping away under impulse. So they may maneuver using contragrav for landing and takeoff, but it's not their main source of propulsion. Or rather that's how I've interpreted it for my own ST adaption (under construction).
__________________
GURPS Fanzine The Path of Cunning is worth a read. |
12-28-2016, 08:45 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jan 2014
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
Star Trek impulse drives are fursion rockets with lots of mass lightening to allow for their high accelerations. IIRC, it's used by practically all spacecraft including shuttles.
|
12-28-2016, 09:27 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
Quote:
__________________
HMS Overflow-For conversations off topic here. |
|
12-28-2016, 10:08 PM | #8 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
Quote:
ST:TNG did misuse real terms more often than even original series making it feel a bit more dated, in my opinion. Remember their amazing massive computer that could hold some absurdly tiny amount of data like a terabyte or something?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
12-28-2016, 10:10 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
They did have Warp capability but the question was what do they use for manuerving and landing. That is not warp.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
12-29-2016, 06:26 AM | #10 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: traveller
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttles
Quote:
In general, though, the episode isn't very helpful: shuttles run on battery power, that can be recharged from phasers? |
|
Tags |
star trek, star trek spaceships |
|
|