07-18-2019, 01:15 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Mar 2016
|
Trying to codify Political Rank
Political Rank does exist canonically, though not in the Basic Set. It was first mentioned in Social Engineering and was expanded upon in Pulling Rank. So, based on the small amount that's out there, here's the way I see it (this is for the US):
PR7: President (this is the only one that's been confirmed) PR6: Vice President, Senator, Speaker of the House, major cabinet secretary PR5: Representative, governor, minor cabinet secretary PR4: Major city mayor, lower-level statewide office PR3: State Senator, minor city mayor PR2: State Representative, small town mayor PR1: City council member Thoughts? Is there any you think I should move around? Any suggestions for where other offices might fit in? |
07-18-2019, 01:25 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Sep 2018
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
I feel like Political influence would be better represented by Status as it is more the power to influence events than to control them. With the exception of the president who legitimately has military rank all of the others have power because of their ability to make things difficult for people who are less powerful.
|
07-18-2019, 01:52 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
I'm not sure I believe in "political" rank. The president doesn't actually have authority to give, say, a mayor or a legislator orders. He does have temporary rank over things like the military and the civil services but if he wants cooperation against other elected officials he has to use connections persuading and horse trading assisted by the fact that he's always dealing with lower status people than him. And the vice president doesn't have authority over anyone except his personal staff.
|
07-18-2019, 02:01 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
This is where a Political Empowerment advantage similar to Legal Enforcement Powers and Clerical Investment may come in handy.
If dead set on using Rank, I'd consider the Pulling Rank variant for the Assistance Roll for the aid available from the granting agency. Modern politics is a pain when it comes to simplifying for GURPS, since politics is never simple.
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
07-18-2019, 02:05 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Mar 2016
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Worth noting that I'm not really talking about the implementation of Rank within a game, but just the rankings. And as I said in the first post, Political Rank is actually an advantage that exists canonically
|
07-18-2019, 03:13 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Quote:
The presidency does not have heirarchical authority over the roles below it on your list. Senators do not have authority over Representatives. Etc. I think the concept of political rank is probably fundamentally flawed. Some of those roles have Administrative rank in a bureaucracy, and the president has (top) military rank. |
|
07-18-2019, 03:22 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Mar 2016
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2019, 03:35 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Quote:
The most important rule in all the books is on page B492: "When any rule gives a silly result, follow common sense instead. No matter how much we playtest, no rules are perfect – including these." |
|
07-18-2019, 03:51 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Mar 2016
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2019, 04:05 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Trying to codify Political Rank
Definitely run with it if you can figure out a way that actually makes it work to your satisfaction.
|
|
|