10-05-2017, 11:53 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Hello Folks,
The campaign I'm running is essentially a GURPSification of NIGHT CITY from CP2020. Recently, the hero of the story (Using FG2 to run this), got involved by heading over to the Afterlife bar, which serves as a sort of recruiting hall for mercenaries. Long story short, the player couldn't muster enough bodies for the jobs being offered at the time, and jumped at a job that he thought he could handle where it required a security detail - one that reputable mercenaries ALL turned down. So, the first mission was one where he had to bodyguard a scientist who was engaged in illegal scientific research on humans. He infected them with a tailored plague while disguising his research as petroleum based research for genetically enhancing algae to produce a high energy plant based oil substitute. Long story short, the player is now discovering that his employee, is not a good man, and that he has fingers in pies that involve treachery, greed, and human misery. An individual who assesses people like a profiler would, said "he's a psychopath who hasn't personally killed anyone - yet". That this man is also a multi-millionaire tycoon is a sign that the man is ruthless. So, here is the problem. Eventually, I'm going to want to detail the Psychopath's organization and how he works to increase his profits. "Anything for a buck" would be the motto this man lives by. So, ideas? Thoughts? Ways to make this into a major league MEMORABLE villian without spilling the beans up front? I think that a few missions that seemingly have nothing to do with the Tycoon will eventually get tied in. Perhaps eventually, a set of "books" that detail the earnings of these criminal enterprises, or perhaps mercenary work that demolished certain businesses or opportunities, would eventually be traced back to the Tycoon. There is Moral Immoral And finally, there is Amoral. Our tycoon is the latter. It isn't that he constantly does evil per se, it is just that he does both Good and Evil and doesn't care. He just knows enough to hide his "highly profitable options" because that also brings down a lot of people trying to shut down his profit making venture. He could just as easily be financing robotic research for rescue robots, and just as easily finance illegal medical experimentation. He could also just as easily hire a geneticist to create experimental genetically altered humans, and not bat an eye when these artificial constructs die still born, or worse yet, survive, but at a horrendous cost. Think Cyberpunk meets Biopunk if you will. THoughts, ideas, suggestions? |
10-09-2017, 02:28 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
It's the small things that are telling.
Think of the opening scene of House of Cards. The deed done won't affect the world, or the USA - but it tells us a lot about the ethics of the character. So show your NPC do something like that. If he's into medical research, then an employee tells his something like: "Our orbital lab's report: they've found the means to prevent mutation LB-534. However, the economic analysis shows it's never going to pay, the treatment is exceedingly costly and the syndrome will only affect some 10,000 persons per year all over the world in the foreseeable future". The boss: "OK, then let's drop it, tell them to research something profitable. Oh, and make sure our insurance companies screen for that mutation and refuse to cover potential subjects". |
10-09-2017, 07:35 AM | #3 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Quote:
That's not to say it couldn't register as "amoral" in its effect on the audience's sentiments. But you seem to be aiming at a subtle and thus cerebral effect, one that emerges if the players think about it. It seems as if a casuistic approach to morality would work better than a sentimental one. So what kinds of decisions could someone make in the pharmaceutical industry that maximized profits, but were actually indefensible in terms of service to the customers? How about having evidence that a product they've been working on could have really nasty long-term side effects, and ordering either that the study that found them be suppressed, or that a new study be conducted that's set up to avoid finding the same side effects? Oh, of course eventually it will come out, but by that time the company will have taken its profits, and our man in particular will have cashed out and retired, leaving the shareholders with the costs of any lawsuits? (So he not merely puts corporate gains ahead of service to the customers, but puts personal gains ahead of his duty to the shareholders.)
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
10-09-2017, 08:11 AM | #4 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Quote:
Going back to the House of Cards first scene, I said it was telling about the character's ethics - not the lack thereof. Some would disapprove of that choice, some would say it is defensible. It would be pretty "not sure", as you say, pretty gray. All viewers certainly gather, however, that this guy is a very cold-blooded SOB. Not afraid of dirtying his own hands, literally. And memorable. This is what I think the OP wanted. Quote:
|
||
10-09-2017, 08:31 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
10-09-2017, 08:49 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
I'm of two thoughts regarding "subtlety" here...
It is a GREAT idea to be sure, and one I'd use in a heartbeat for other players. However, I think that in this case, I'd have to be about as subtle as handing a defective firing pin laced gun to the player character involved, before the "ethics" aspect of the NPC would impact sufficiently on the player himself. :( For what it is worth, I'm using INTERFACE ZERO as a sort of source book for ideas in generating background events, including "Mercenary tickets" for which the player can either accept, or pass on. The agency that hands out these "mercenary tickets" employs a system where they grade or rate mercenaries who take their "tickets" by means of Employer feedback. "Success/Failure" being the primary means of judging the mission, and lack of "news reporting" on the ticket being another. On the flip side, they also rate "contractors" (those who offer the jobs) based on input from the mercenaries where complaints are involved. In a way, they act as a bonding house because they expect the payments to come to them (so they get their cut of the fees) and they release the payments to the mercenaries. The thing is - there will be a lot of "random events" not even connected to the "contractor" who is the Arms Dealer. So, how to interlace the "random events" with the planned events, and how to paint the progression such that it becomes a big selling point that this man needs to be stopped - that is the problem. Creating a bioweapon that can be used against populations, and have a reliable cure comes under the heading of "Amoral" where profits are concerned. Building a high rise knowingly using faulty materials and then arranging the kidnapping of the building inspector's family to insure that he doesn't spill the beans of the issue - might be another aspect. How would this play out? The "Contract" might be to protect the man's family from a "revenge" attack. It would be painted as "The man has gambling debts, and his family, unaware of the danger they are in, are oblivious to the situation. Your job is to arrange an unwilling extraction, keep them safe against organized crime for three days, and then release them. While you are doing this, a second team will be hunting down the original team that was sent out to kidnap and exact pressure against the government official." Now that seems like a semi-plausible scenario - maybe. But if the player takes the job - the only way he'll find out what is really happening is if he digs in deeper to find out that the government official is really little more than a building inspector, and that the second team is making an effort to either falsify the material evidence, or compromise it so that it doesn't affect the "Amoral" individual's life. The real problem from my perspective? Is how do I build this UP without being heavy handed? Case in point? In one campaign, I had an NPC. She was ONLY supposed to be a single scene walk on type of character. Well, the players took to her in a big way. She got involved in a situation that resulted in her hubris being rewarded with a major humiliating slap down, and that slap down resulted in her having a wakeup call about her life, as well as the companions she kept. That she fell in love with one of the player characters is NOT something I'd have thought of had it not been for a reaction roll atop of the humiliation - that and the player's teasing display of chivalry at a time where she didn't deserve it. Long story short, as GM, I set this up to be a long term thread. I thought I was being "Subtle" - and I even made an attempt at "opsec" by not discussing this with my wife in ANY manner. It took less than 4 game sessions for my wife to blurt out at the table "You Idiot - can't you see she's in love with you?" So, I really need to work on being subtle (Or maybe I was being subtle enough, and my wife was just that good, because the other player was shocked to find out of the situation, and eventually did end up looking at the NPC as wife material after all - despite her history). Probably what I need are a progression of "non-random" missions where the "villain" either supplies the missions himself, or are supplied by his victims targeting the villain" that basically escalate things in the eyes of the player character. |
10-09-2017, 08:51 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Quote:
Maybe something along those lines perhaps? |
|
10-09-2017, 09:16 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Since I'm reasonably certain that the other individual doesn't come online and view things here...
An explanation might be in order... The villain here is a character named Omar Khadabhi (Cyberpunk 2020's NIGHT CITY character for those who might be familiar), using the pseudonym of "Peter Knowleton" when handling anything over the 'net. He uses a Voice distorter with a preprogrammed voice to maintain continuity, along with a video feed distorter that subtly changes his appearance enough that although he bears a resemblance to the image in question to anyone who has seen "Peter" via video communication, will not be seen as BEING Peter should the person meet up with Omar in person. That having been said, the first "adventure" involving the player character and Omar involved the sudden need to protect his "investment" from an extraction attempt by certain of his "enemies". The biochemist was working on weaponizing a disease that had certain unpleasant characteristics. The Biochemist was unfortunately caught in his own trap, where he himself through carelessness, became infected. The disease was similar to Ebola in that it was a blood disease, but had an airborne aspect to it with a VERY short lifespan. The pathogen could not survive prolonged exposure to sunlight and oxygen - and was originally discovered as surviving as an underground organism usually found within crude oil. A little genetic tweaking, and the pathogen would be idea for becoming a weapon. Eventually, the Player Character found out about the fact that this biochemist was involved in unlawful and unethical testing on humans, and arranged for the biochemist to die of his own disease. The "tricky" part was that his contract required that his "principle" survived 24 hours and was not extracted by a hostile team. The Biochemist died outside of the 24 hour limit, but became unconscious and unresponsive within the 24 hour period. In addition? The Biochemist had a working prototype serum that he was CLOSE to perfecting, and if he could get one does crafted within 9 hours, he'd use it for his own needs first, then manufacture the subsequent doses afterwards - but at the expense of his innocent test subjects lives. The player character simply helped the biochemist make the right decision - used the prototype developed by the biochemist as something to be analyzed, and copied. See, the biochemist had 9 hours to live, his test subject batch had about 48. |
10-09-2017, 09:24 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Ultimately, this "job" paves the way, if successful, for an immediate second job, the rescue of one of "Peter's" employees who had been kidnapped earlier. The 12 individuals who are holding the kidnapped individual at an industrial site nearby in the city, are trying to oppose the "Arms Dealer" and gain information that would have helped them extract the Biochemist in part 1 earlier.
The new "Mercenary ticket" requires a success only payment for the extraction of the kidnapped employee, but offers a blood bounty payment -regardless of success of the initial mission to insure that these particular "terrorists" are put down. In this instance, the idea is to cloak the real intent behind the seeming major intent. That the so called Terrorists are actually trying to STOP this man won't be readily apparent unless the player character involved decides to do some digging. Once his mission is finalized, I intend to have a news reporter do a background expose on the 12 people he may potentially destroy (how ever many he does kill in the rescue attempt, will be the number of people the Reporter will write a story about). Hopefully, this might give the player some idea of what is maybe happening. What will hopefully make this scenario memorable, isn't that there were 12 antagonists involved - but that it takes place in an industrial plant, with miles of pipes containing caustic chemicals, high voltage power lines, gratings for flooring, etc. That and the fact that the "kidnappers" are holding this kidnap victim in the heart of a business that has NOTHING to do with the kidnappers to begin with. Collateral damage is going to be potentially a problem. |
10-09-2017, 06:31 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: Advice sought for fleshing out a major villian
Look for some good fictional examples and see what the authors do to establish character. Gus Fring from Breaking Bad and Marcone from Dresden Files are both good criminal mob bosses who exude menace without being obvious about it.
|
|
|