07-24-2018, 12:42 AM | #41 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Bows and crossbows are not. That's specific to melee and thrown weapons, plus arrows and bolts.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
07-24-2018, 01:05 AM | #42 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
I stand corrected.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
07-24-2018, 01:13 AM | #43 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Though unlike swords, bows have several TLs of actual improvements (which mostly aren't reflected in the rules).
|
07-24-2018, 05:51 AM | #44 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Depends on the feature you are looking at. The primary drawback of steel relative to fiberglass (or wood) is that it's heavy - for the same energy storage you'll need something like 5 times the weight, even of modern spring steels.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd Last edited by malloyd; 07-24-2018 at 06:54 AM. |
07-24-2018, 08:16 AM | #45 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Quote:
How It's Made: Golf Clubs (The grip itself starts at 3:00 in. Simply attaching it is still largely manual.) Google tells me there's about a billion dollars a year in wholesale sales of golf clubs in the US alone. It also shows me around a factor of ten difference in retail prices, but that's still likely in the low millions of clubs per year. A mere 12,000 swords a month might not even rate this much automation :) We don't get to see the automation making things like double-sided tape and molded rubber. (That's part of that whole network of industry that's part of the advantage of higher TLs, not just isolated design of pieces and single materials.) Or, heck, why settle for analogies? How It's Made: Swords Those are of course for the current low-volume hobbyist market, not serious military applications. But it might still give an idea of what the production facilities and methods might look like, in contrast to the sweaty guy with big arms pounding on an anvil. |
|
07-24-2018, 08:25 AM | #46 | |
Join Date: Feb 2014
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2018, 10:14 AM | #47 | |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Quote:
__________________
Compact Castles gives the gamer an instant portfolio of genuine, real-world castle floorplans to use in any historical, low-tech, or fantasy game setting. |
|
07-24-2018, 01:43 PM | #48 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
High Tech talks about High Tech bows and crossbows briefly (and of course The Deadly Spring does too at more length), it's just that the way they improve is not the free quality steps given to blades from Basic.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
07-24-2018, 05:47 PM | #49 |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
You only need to penetrate far enough to reach a vital organ or major blood vessel, which is a few inches. Any over penetration reduces performance by making it harder/slower to withdraw for the next attack.
__________________
Compact Castles gives the gamer an instant portfolio of genuine, real-world castle floorplans to use in any historical, low-tech, or fantasy game setting. |
07-24-2018, 06:12 PM | #50 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: TL4 vs. TL7 melee weapons
Getting a weapon stuck in an enemy is not ideal, but unless specially designed otherwise, a weapon that's easier to stick in is also easier to pull out, and in any case having a weapon stuck in your foe is hardly the worst problem to have.
|
|
|