05-01-2012, 04:01 PM | #31 | |
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Re: Forget DF: what about normal melee combat tactics??
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2012, 09:18 PM | #32 |
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: Forget DF: what about normal melee combat tactics??
Thanks for this discussion, everyone--it has been hugely helpful. I clearly have a lot to learn about GURPS melee combat! Also, I see why guns are so popular in the real world--they are so much easier to use in GURPS! :-)
__________________
-apoc527 My Campaigns Currently Playing: GURPS Banestorm: The Symmetry of Darkness Inactive: Star*Drive: 2525-Hunting for Fun and Profit My THS Campaign-In the Shadows of Venus Yrth--The Legend Begins The XCOM Apocalypse |
05-01-2012, 10:16 PM | #33 | |
Join Date: Nov 2011
|
Re: Forget DF: what about normal melee combat tactics??
Quote:
Olympic fencing though? That's just as entirely irrelevant to what an actual sword fight looks like. |
|
05-04-2012, 12:50 AM | #34 |
Join Date: May 2007
|
Combat, time and Malory --
IIRC in Malory's version of King Arthur two good swordsmen could fight all afternoon without a decisive result.
While this was fiction remember that Malory was writing for an audience in the late 15th century that did know more than a little about hand-to-hand combat. If his work was WAY off line he'd lose his audience. [Said audience would include upper class folks -- lower class ones were less literate. So it's a crowd of nobles, warriors, well-to-do merchants and clerics; and odds are the latter two groups have fighters somewhere in their family or circle of acquaintances.] So I'm inclined to suspect that there was a grain of truth in his writing. Not to mention Sir Thomas M. was a knight himself, so should have had at least training in swordsmanship if not practical experience. Also -- saw an acquaintance of mine, who is a martial arts student and a member of ARMA, practice a drill from a c. 1500 fechtbuch. Was far faster and more dramatic than anything I've ever seen in a movie. What I liked most about the Princess Bride clip is that both men started slow and a bit cautious. Makes sense -- you want to know just how good the other guy is before you try to get fast & creative in your own work. |
05-04-2012, 01:03 AM | #35 | |
Join Date: Nov 2011
|
Re: Combat, time and Malory --
Quote:
On Mallory though (and not that who he was is heavily debated.) since most likely he and his readers knew a thing or two about fighting when the stuff in his books were scaled to heroic reality to show how awesome the people depicted he didn't have to spell it out. His readers would know when he was being realistic and when he was depicted larger than life deeds. |
|
05-04-2012, 01:46 AM | #36 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Combat, time and Malory --
Based on modern combat sports, seems unlikely unless they're spending most of the fight staring at one another (cardio is a big issue, and no way does a medieval man in armor have the endurance of an unencumbered modern athlete), and are wearing enough armor that a hit won't do anything significant (once two people engage, it's exceptional to go more than a few seconds without a hit).
Last edited by Anthony; 05-04-2012 at 01:52 AM. |
06-15-2012, 10:49 PM | #37 | |
Join Date: May 2007
|
Re: Combat, time and Malory --
Quote:
Of course, Malory often had his fights end with a good smite to the "brain pan." Lights out, game over, go back to the Big Circular Table and tell the story . . . |
|
Tags |
combat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|