|
10-24-2012, 04:37 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
[LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
So, I'm currently playing a Magneto-like mage in a fantasy campaign, with Telekinesis 35 (Magnetic, -50%) being his primary advantage. I realized that giving him a huge metal bow rated for ST 35 might be really effective, but I'm having trouble scaling it up.
The only metal bow that I found in the books is the tubular bow from Low Tech, but it's designed to be both small and light, letting the steel's tensile strength compensate for how short the bow and the draw length are. I'm not sure if it's in the spirit of the entry to just scale up the numbers. Now, Low Tech Companion 2 has rules for enlarging weapons. It pretty neatly puts ST 35 as suited for SM+3 wielders. Nothing outright bars me from making a SM+0 bow rated for ST 35, but the campaign setting is rather consistent, so some kind of natural progression would be preferred - i.e. a bow the size of a ballista would be much more plausible than a tiny human-sized bow that you can only draw with a hydraulic piston. I have several questions regarding the weapon scaling method:
|
10-24-2012, 04:43 AM | #2 |
Join Date: May 2012
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
You could try fiddling around with the deadly spring making a large metal cross now. May take a while, and you may find it doesn't do the damage you want, but it will be as close to realism as you are going to get.
You may even find such a large metal bow wouldn't work at all. Though truth be told, if he has magnetic powers he would probably be better off shooting metal bullets sling style! |
10-24-2012, 04:46 AM | #3 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
How would a metal only teke pull a non magnetic bow string?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
10-24-2012, 05:23 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
Good luck trying to make a bow with a metallic string.
|
10-24-2012, 05:28 AM | #5 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
Why am I trying so hard to come up with puns about only "axes" being able to be "metal"?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
10-24-2012, 05:30 AM | #6 | |||
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
Quote:
So, it's Thr+9 imp Quote:
Quote:
A tubular bow is very hard to make, that's why the cost. The weight is also correct. Yes. |
|||
10-24-2012, 05:25 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Re: [LT] Monstrous Bow SM+3
|
Tags |
bow, deadly spring, low-tech, pyramid 3/33, steel bow, tubular bow |
|
|