NatEnc and ICFTF - Page 8

Greg 1 · 08-25-2009, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg 1

Kmunoz, this resource is too wonderful to be so hard to find.

I strongly suggest that you add a link to the RPGnet list of unofficial GURPS netbooks

http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/List_o...GURPS_Netbooks

And the same goes for your campaign setting, but I suggest that you let people go directly to the bestiaries, since more people are likely to want to read that than the campaign setting (not a slight on your setting - its just how people are).

kmunoz · 08-25-2009, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg 1

And the same goes for your campaign setting, but I suggest that you let people go directly to the bestiaries, since more people are likely to want to read that than the campaign setting (not a slight on your setting - its just how people are).

Odd, I thought I'd changed the link to point directly to the PDF a while back. I'll have to fix that again. . .

Greg 1 · 08-25-2009, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmunoz

Odd, I thought I'd changed the link to point directly to the PDF a while back. I'll have to fix that again. . .

Yes, but what about including all of these things in the list of GURPS netbooks at rpg.net?

I think your projects are fantastic and I never would have found them if you hadn't mentioned them in a discussion here.

kmunoz · 08-25-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg 1

Yes, but what about including all of these things in the list of GURPS netbooks at rpg.net?

Yeah, I'll look into that.

kmunoz · 10-16-2009, 08:51 AM

I heard back on the Bestiary proposal, which was not accepted, but the reason is encouraging: "at this time we are evaluating other approaches to the BESTIARY line; we believe we are close to a final resolution."

demonsbane · 10-17-2009, 10:52 PM

We'll see, then. Thanks for your notification.

demonsbane · 10-17-2009, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg 1

And the same goes for your campaign setting, but I suggest that you let people go directly to the bestiaries, since more people are likely to want to read that than the campaign setting (not a slight on your setting - its just how people are).

I agree with this.

kmunoz · 10-18-2009, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonsbane

I agree with this.

The links do go directly to the files now.

demonsbane · 10-23-2009, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmunoz

The links do go directly to the files now.

Thank you for the update!

10-16-2009, 08:51 AM	#75
kmunoz Join Date: May 2006 Location: Seattle, Washington	Re: NatEnc and ICFTF I heard back on the Bestiary proposal, which was not accepted, but the reason is encouraging: "at this time we are evaluating other approaches to the BESTIARY line; we believe we are close to a final resolution." __________________ Natural Encyclopedia: 660 GURPS bestiary entries It Came from the Forums: A Community Bestiary with 160 entries (last updated 2009...someday I will revisit.)

10-17-2009, 10:52 PM	#76
demonsbane Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Spain —Europe	Re: NatEnc and ICFTF We'll see, then. Thanks for your notification. __________________ "Let's face it: for some people, roleplaying is a serious challenge, a life-or-death struggle." J. M. Caparula/Scott Haring "Physics is basic but inessential." Wolfgang Smith My G+