Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > The Fantasy Trip > The Fantasy Trip: House Rules

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2020, 07:26 PM   #1
TippetsTX
 
TippetsTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
Default Come back with your shield... or on it.

The following are my replacement rules for shields.

IMO absorbing incremental points of damage is not how a shield is supposed to function. Their primary purpose is to block the hit entirely which is best simulated using DX penalties in TFT.

BUCKLER/MAIN-GAUCHE -1 DX to be hit
SMALL SHIELD -2 DX
LARGE SHIELD -4 DX
TOWER SHIELD -6 DX

Some may notice how nicely this now aligns with the existing 'concealment' rules (ITL page 122).

Note: When the shield is used offensively (i.e. shield-rush or off-hand strike) this bonus is lost.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos
TippetsTX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 08:02 PM   #2
larsdangly
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

One possible problem is that this scaling runs away for large and tower shields, making it basically required to fight with them. If I can take a -3 DX penalty while imposing a -6 DX penalty, I basically have to do it, no matter what else is going on. If both sides do this (as they should), all melee combat is fought at -9 adjDX. Oof.
larsdangly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 08:27 PM   #3
TippetsTX
 
TippetsTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

That is true, though it is worth noting that shields (as well as armor) have ST requirements in my game which keeps the number of heroes running around w/ tower shields somewhat manageable.

SMALL SHIELD requires 8 ST to use effectively
LARGE SHIELD requires 10 ST
TOWER SHIELD requires 13 ST

It is also possible to mitigate some of the shield penalties using talents. My revised version of SHIELD EXPERTISE, for example, reduces the DX penalty by 1.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos

Last edited by TippetsTX; 09-11-2020 at 08:51 PM.
TippetsTX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 09:49 PM   #4
hcobb
 
hcobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacheco, California
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

Shields, armor, and weapons are already limited by weight, though not to the levels you indicate. It takes a ST of 9 to carry a Tower Shield in one hand.
__________________
-HJC
hcobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2020, 09:58 PM   #5
TippetsTX
 
TippetsTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hcobb View Post
Shields, armor, and weapons are already limited by weight, though not to the levels you indicate. It takes a ST of 9 to carry a Tower Shield in one hand.
Except being able to use a tower (or any) shield effectively requires more effort than would simply carrying it around. I also tend to use a more abstract approach to encumbrance and find that using minimum ST requirements for things like armor and shields is simpler.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos
TippetsTX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2020, 08:06 AM   #6
larsdangly
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

Whatever the details, this looks to me like one of those house rules that introduces a significant enough advantage to a piece of equipment that it stands out against the background of generally balanced gear, and so becomes necessary (assuming you are trying to win).
larsdangly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2020, 09:19 AM   #7
TippetsTX
 
TippetsTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by larsdangly View Post
Whatever the details, this looks to me like one of those house rules that introduces a significant enough advantage to a piece of equipment that it stands out against the background of generally balanced gear, and so becomes necessary (assuming you are trying to win).
I hear what you are saying, Lars, but this isn't a scenario that seems remotely desirable outside of arena combat. Tower shields have a place on the battlefield, but are rarely practical in the labyrinth.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos

Last edited by TippetsTX; 09-17-2020 at 05:33 PM.
TippetsTX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2020, 12:19 PM   #8
hcobb
 
hcobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacheco, California
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

What's the stats for the Gou-Rang?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXYltNPlMaM
__________________
-HJC
hcobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2020, 01:06 PM   #9
Skarg
 
Join Date: May 2015
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

I've done some playtesting with a similar house rule, but I simply used the RAW hits stopped as the DX penalty to be hit. That way the original balance is impacted less.

I think:
DX penalty = (RAW hits stopped +1)
may feel about right to me.
Skarg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2020, 01:47 PM   #10
TippetsTX
 
TippetsTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
Default Re: Come back with your shield... or on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skarg View Post
I've done some playtesting with a similar house rule, but I simply used the RAW hits stopped as the DX penalty to be hit. That way the original balance is impacted less.
We started with the same, more moderate, 'to hit' penalties, but in our playtesting the conclusion was that the shields didn't feel shield-y enough (how's that for a technical term?). Plus we also agreed that the opportunity cost wasn't quite balanced since using a shield means giving up a second or larger, more damaging weapons.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos
TippetsTX is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.