02-02-2013, 06:07 PM | #21 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Forces and the self
What if A.I.s don't have souls at all? They are sad abominations; no matter how convincing, they are never the less, merely mimicking true life and spirit.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
02-02-2013, 06:12 PM | #22 | |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
(Or, as cited elsewhere, a dream-figment that has yet to awaken.)
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
|
02-02-2013, 07:17 PM | #23 | ||
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
Quote:
This is also definitely a possibility, in which case an uploaded human mind would be a form of undead, and Heaven would not approve of the procedure. |
||
02-02-2013, 07:39 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Boston
|
Re: Forces and the self
I'm inclined to see "soul" to just mean "a being-shaped collection of Forces." I'm also inclined to suspect that functionally intelligent and goal-directed behavior can't happen without Ethereal and Celestial Forces. So AI are souls, although they could easily be like Undead in that they disperse when their Vessels do. Alternatively anything wired in the right way will partake of the same soul-economy, and Homo sapiens were just the first animals to be made up in that way.
|
02-02-2013, 08:28 PM | #25 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
Re: Forces and the self
I would rea 'doesnt have a soul' in this context as 'lacks Celestial Forces'. The mind requires Ethereal Forces, and the machine has Corporeal forces, but without being cemented by Celestial Forces, they disperse back into the Symphony when the machine is destroyed.
|
02-03-2013, 06:43 AM | #26 | |
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
|
|
02-03-2013, 06:47 AM | #27 | |
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
Last edited by Irioth; 02-03-2013 at 07:34 AM. |
|
02-03-2013, 08:22 AM | #28 | |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
It can't be "has a Celestial Force" - angels, demons, and Ethereals have Celestial Forces but don't have souls, and one- or two-Force infants have souls but don't (usually) have Celestial Forces.
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
|
02-03-2013, 08:55 AM | #29 | |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
One could readily use that rule for IN, although it tends to imply an at least slightly Bright campaign. |
|
02-03-2013, 09:30 AM | #30 | |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: Forces and the self
Quote:
As for infants, I think the Celestial Force would be the first such Force the child possessed ... an infant has such limited interaction with the physical world in its first weeks and months and such a frail body that it effectively has no Corporeal Forces. Ethereal would be the last to come, making the pattern: * Able to (at least vaguely) perceive those around it. (Celestial) * Able to direct physical action, culminating in walking (Corporeal) * Able to remember and concentrate, culminating in talking (Ethereal) Of course, this is something that would probably need to be addressed in Superiors: Christopher, now that I think about it ...
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
|
Tags |
theories |
|
|