05-15-2009, 09:54 AM | #131 |
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
*bump*
I have a design or two I'd like to add to the list; but don't have time right now ... so *bump* to prevent this thread from falling off the edge into the 'memory hole'. |
05-15-2009, 01:04 PM | #132 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
__________________
|
|
05-15-2009, 02:24 PM | #133 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
Quote:
I am not as sanguine about The Snapper , its slow and lacks acceleration and maneuver, and the AT gun even with the computer is -- just OK However in the right arena conditions or against weak weapons -- its a potential killer |
||
05-18-2009, 07:24 AM | #134 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicagoland Area, Illinois
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2009, 05:38 PM | #135 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
*snicker* |
|
05-19-2009, 12:42 AM | #136 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
colander in appallingly short order -- a few rounds of HESH; then either a few rounds of HEAT, or a ram (I never use CA -- There Is A Reason For This). Underpowered, undergunned -- and under the ground in a few turns.
__________________
"Dale *who*?" 79er The Jeremy Clarkson Debate Course: 1) I'm Right. 2) You're Wrong. 3) The End. |
|
05-19-2009, 05:33 AM | #137 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Leeds, England
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
|
|
05-19-2009, 05:00 PM | #138 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
By CA, I assume you mean Carbon-Aluminum frames ... and not Component Armor. Component Armor and a roll cage are integral parts of an anti-ram defense. |
|
05-20-2009, 12:48 AM | #139 | ||
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
Quote:
And it doesn't matter anyway, because of the Almighty Confetti Rule -- anyone doing 78 pts. or more in a ram automatically destroys it, regardless of whether or not it had a Roll Cage. This design is a Failure. The End.
__________________
"Dale *who*?" 79er The Jeremy Clarkson Debate Course: 1) I'm Right. 2) You're Wrong. 3) The End. |
||
05-22-2009, 04:27 PM | #140 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Re: The Unoffial 2056 Vehicle Guide
Quote:
And I agree, the design stinks ... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|