06-02-2009, 06:13 PM | #1 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Why does the future only begin at TL9?
I don't understand why there aren't some things that are TL8 in Ultra Tech. I don't understand why some things have the tech levels they do. The Pnumohypospray (A.K.A. Star Trek's Hypospray) is TL9. In real life it's TL7. Beamed Power is TL 10. Why? TV stations regularly beam their signals up to a satellite with Microwaves, and then down to TV station. What's so futuristic about that? Is it because it uses more power? The Glowstick is TL9. In real life, they've been around since the 70's. They're also listed in High Tech as Chemsticks as TL7. What's the difference? Wirefences are listed as TL 9-11. What's so futuristic about them? The Laser Mike is listed @ TL9. They're also listed as TL7 in High Tech. Sprays are listed @ TL9. What's so futuristic about spray. Plasma Weapons are Superscience. Why? Fire is Plasma. Flamethrowers shoot fire. What is so futuristic about shooting Plasma? Is it because of the Electromagnetic fields?
|
06-02-2009, 06:21 PM | #2 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Microwave Disruptors are "refinements of single shot explosively pumped high power Microwave Pulse weapons of TL8" Huh? What does that mean? They're not listed in High Tech. Computer Monitoring Gear using TEMPEST is a MYTH! Why isn't it listed as Superscience? Mr. Pulver, I can't wait to hear your reply.
|
06-02-2009, 06:28 PM | #3 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Quote:
If you actually look at the technical definitions of the concepts that are being referred to, a lot of those things in Ultra-Tech will make more sense. Bill Stoddard |
|
06-02-2009, 06:28 PM | #4 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Quote:
Quote:
Fire != Plasma. Fire is a chemical reaction involving some kind of solid, liquid, or gas as fuel. Flamethrowers ignite and project that fuel and the fire goes with it. Plasma is superheated gas, which means that its molecules are even less compressed and orderly than those of regular air. A realistic weapon that projected it would have an effective range worse than an air gun, slightly beyond the end of the barrel, as the plasma blew out in all directions as soon as it wasn't contained. UT field-jacketing is essential for an effective ranged plasma weapon. |
||
06-02-2009, 06:43 PM | #5 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Really? Could have fooled me... and I'm in the industry.
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
06-02-2009, 07:01 PM | #6 | |
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Quote:
|
|
06-02-2009, 07:02 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
I think what is missing is the 'ultra' factor of the UT suppliments versus a mundane websters dictionary comparison of the words in the names of the items and technologies in suppliments. UT deals with this clearly in the preface/introduction of the book as I think any of the SJG verbage on explaining TL's and comparing them does a good job as well.
Also I think UT its a significantly more than 'better' in the OP's comparison. The 'plasma weapons' comparison is making a comparsion that 'plasma weapons' as the OP defines them pre-date gunpowered weapons for what its worth. The SJG discussions of 'TL' and how the technologies are stamped as 'TL#' are not when the technology was postulated or understood, but rather when it was proven as viable in mass production or could be assured to be so. Future 'bettering' of the TL occurs when further breakthroughs intrisicly, the supporting or underlying technolgies increase, etc.
__________________
"Look after the universe for me will you, I have put a lot of work into it." -- Doctor Who |
06-02-2009, 07:11 PM | #8 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Quote:
If something was invented prior to TL9, it will be TL9 in UT. Quote:
|
||
06-02-2009, 09:55 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
Yeah. What he said.
@OP: I think the tech books are pretty explicit that just because something is mentioned at a specific tech level doesn't mean that TL was its first introduction - it simply gives the details of the item at that level...or perhaps notes the first real wide-spread usage of a technology that has been around in the experimental/prototype stage. M |
06-02-2009, 10:09 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Why does the future only begin at TL9?
That does seem like one of their worse ideas. High tech provides TLs for some items from TL0-4, which is a lot more helpful and takes no more space than than 'TL9, and we won't bother to mention that it's also TL8.'
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
Tags |
sci-fi, science fiction, technology |
|
|