04-19-2018, 01:56 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kentucky
|
2300 ad tl
I'm puttering around on converting some 2300 AD and 2320 AD materials over to GURPS. I was wondering what the consensus on the forum was as to what TL the 2300 AD universe would be. It seems to me to be a mix of TL 9 & 10, although I can also see strong influence of TL 8 in that setting. What do you all think?
|
04-19-2018, 02:15 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
I would pick out the technologies I thought were appropriate to match the setting materials and call that "TL 2300 AD." Unless you need to use the TL in a formula, the actual value doesn't matter much.
__________________
Read my GURPS blog: http://noschoolgrognard.blogspot.com |
04-19-2018, 02:34 PM | #3 |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
RogerBW did some work on this, a while ago.
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
04-19-2018, 04:26 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
Basic TL seems about 9 in general feel, but with weapon tech being advanced (TL 10) and computer tech being very retarded at very early TL 8 and communications tech being retarded at TL 8 mostly.
And of course there are couple of super science technologies: Stutterwarp, Trusters and Force screens at least. So for overall TL I would call it TL 9 with notes for the modifiers. |
04-21-2018, 05:54 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
Aside from that one mention of a stupidly small amount of memory storage in a hand computer, there's no indication computers are so bad. There's mention of a distributed computer network in one adventure that you just plug everything into anywhere you like and it configures the connections so it works correctly. That's better than today's tech, and we're better than GURPS standard TL8 computing.
Communications is also fine, except cellphones aren't emphasised. OTOH, colonists might not want to be so dependant on the phone infrastructure and prefer satellite phones, so a cultural and not a technological limitation. 2300AD tech certainly has the capability to make decent cellphones. Note that we don't get a really good look at what a core world's infrastructure is like, and how core worlders live. Weapons are TL9/10 - good binary rifles, functional gauss rifles, lasers are useful, but not for general issue, and plasma guns are heavy with very limited ammo capacity but are very powerful. Hovercraft are quite effective and in more common use than we'd expect, a marginal diversion from the 'real world' as we currently understand it. Note that the 'screens' of space ships are not force screens - they are suspended particle 'screens' - probably superscience, but not in the same order as force screens at all. The thrusters used to get into orbit are just heat exchangers using the heat from an MHD turbine, and are unrealistically powerful and efficient, but aren't a complete handwave (and my recollection was that making a spaceplane that could make a round trip to and from Earth without refuelling and had a reasonable payload wasn't really possible, so they weren't too hopelessly good).
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
04-21-2018, 08:13 AM | #6 | ||
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
Quote:
There are also quite many other indications that computer tech is quite bad. Some below: Subermacalc: Why build a calculator only device as microchips to make a simple actual computer are less than a square mm more today? Computer Station: weights 250kg and costs Lv30,000 When an office worker is said to make Lv10,000-15,000/year. Basically the makers of 2300AD did not predict the tremendous TL 8 computer revolution just like most other people did not. So the computers are based on a slow evolution of the large computers of TL 7, so you could call their computer tech TL 7+1 Quote:
As for the handheld communicators: Today you can get handheld radios weighting 1kg with 80km nominal ranges compared to the 1kg radio with 20km range in AD 2300 So overall communications technology seems to be below current(Late TL 8), but definitely above TL 7(transistor radios), so seems closer to what would be expected of average TL 8. So overall I stand by my conclusion of TL 8 generally for both communications and Computers. But As computers took a different path than in our word, you could call them TL7+1 and not get an argument from me. You have to remember that the divergence point between AD2300 and out world was in the late 1980s where instead of the Soviet Union getting close to collapsing and then collapsing in 1990s, we had it survive and prosper and then in the middle of 1990s we had WW III including a nuclear war. So any technology after that is understandably on a different path than our world. Last edited by weby; 04-21-2018 at 08:32 AM. |
||
04-21-2018, 08:40 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
The canonical T2300 setting has AI - see Rotten to the Core and the Earth/Cybertech sourcebook.
There are no force screen, the screens mentioned in the game are electromagnetic clouds of laser ablative crystals, similar tot he sandcaster of traveller but held in a magnetic field. There are no magical 'thrusters; either, you either use stutterwarp superscience or rockets/ion drives/solar sails etc. There is also the superscience of the beanstalk material. Finally there is a group on antagonists called the provolutionists who augment their agents cybernetially and biologically. |
04-21-2018, 11:42 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
I think that several of us who remember the game felt that Earth/Cybertech was a bit of a false step – it was trying to hook into the cyberpunk gaming boom of the era, but wasn't really in keeping with the rest of the setting. So if you wanted to saw that off and pretend it didn't happen, I don't think it would break anything.
__________________
Podcast: Improvised Radio Theatre - With Dice Gaming stuff here: Tekeli-li! Blog; Webcomic Laager and Limehouse Buy things by me on Warehouse 23 |
04-21-2018, 11:48 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
Quote:
The thrusters allow you to go down and up a 1g planet by using approximately 14.3% if the mass as fuel. (Rule is add 1/6th of the mass as fuel for that, but do not count that fuel as part of the mass. See naval architects manual page 9) The fuel appears to be hydrogen-oxygen as it can be made in the fuel station by splitting water. The specfic impulse varies a bit depending things like the altitude but is normally below 400 at sea level on earth and below 500 in vacuum. The full equations due to the changing pressure and the slight fraction of unburned hydrogen normally used you would be complex but using a value closer to vacuum than seal level gives good enough result as the ship will spend more time outside the densest atmosphere than inside it, so picking say 450 as average very generous ISP and putting it and the fuel fraction into the basic rocket equation: delta-v=specific impulse*9.80665 m/s/s* Natural logarithm of(mass with fuel/mass without fuel). We get a delta-v of 679 meters/second and you would need 9000+ m/second to get to low earth orbit, so there is a factor of 13 more needed. Thus their thrusters must do some super science to get to orbit with that low fuel fraction. You would need a fuel fraction of about 7.7 to 1 to get that speed with hydrogen-oxide, that is for each kilogram to orbit you need to add about 6.7 kilograms of hydrogen and oxygen combined. In reality you need more than that as your total mass is highest when your efficiency is lowest in the lower atmosphere, the efficiency used in the calculation was rounded heavily upwards, system loss and so on, but that is close enough for visualization purposes. |
|
04-21-2018, 12:10 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Re: 2300 ad tl
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|