Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2010, 06:55 AM   #1
vicky_molokh
GURPS FAQ Keeper
 
vicky_molokh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
Default [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Greetings, all!

Superheroic fiction has a fair share of characters going for their enemies in a close and personal manner. There's the well-known brick archetype, but there are also others, such as the agile amazon, some speedster subtypes etc.

But from a purely rules-oriented PoV, what's the point? A close combatant will get maybe a 30% discount compared to a 'blaster' in terms of point cost of the main attack power, but will get endless opportunities due to being unable to engage opponents at range.

Notably, close combatant all but have to invest in some sort of high-cost defensive or mobility power just to survive getting into range; their attacks are easier to defend against; they are not as good at dealing with waves of dispersed mooks; they effectively can't engage hard-to-access enemies unless they have a mobility power comparable to flight etc.

So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'?

Thanks in advance!
__________________
Vicky 'Molokh', GURPS FAQ and uFAQ Keeper
vicky_molokh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 07:11 AM   #2
LoneWolf23k
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Quote:
So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'?
...What, that's not incentive enough?
LoneWolf23k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 07:55 AM   #3
lexington
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Hit locations would be one reason. Only blasters that sink a lot of points into skill or accuracy can compete with melee character's ability to exploit weak points on the target. And if the bad guy is holding onto a weapon or defense that the blaster can't deal with someone has to go in and get rid of it.

That extra DR or dodging skill they use to get into close combat also means that they can work well as support. With more DR they can grapple the enemy speedster and take the hit when the blasters blasts both of them. With the extra Dodge (or Parry or maybe Block) they can safely go ahead of blasters and shut down defenses in cramped areas like a cave system or supervillain base.
lexington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 08:46 AM   #4
David Johnston2
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
Greetings, all!

Superheroic fiction has a fair share of characters going for their enemies in a close and personal manner. There's the well-known brick archetype, but there are also others, such as the agile amazon, some speedster subtypes etc.

But from a purely rules-oriented PoV, what's the point? A close combatant will get maybe a 30% discount compared to a 'blaster' in terms of point cost of the main attack power, but will get endless opportunities due to being unable to engage opponents at range.

Notably, close combatant all but have to invest in some sort of high-cost defensive or mobility power just to survive getting into range; their attacks are easier to defend against; they are not as good at dealing with waves of dispersed mooks; they effectively can't engage hard-to-access enemies unless they have a mobility power comparable to flight etc.

So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'?

Thanks in advance!
If you don't invest in a high cost defense power you'll go down pretty quick anyway so not getting one is false economy.
David Johnston2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:05 AM   #5
Kalzazz
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Also, ST is generally a good thing, more ability to wear armor, damage, and HP

And weapons are good, and most supers are TL 8, so very fine, balanced katanas etc are cheap

High ST + Good Weapon + Weapon Master = Fun

And weapon attack skills also are your close in defense skills
Kalzazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:18 AM   #6
Bruno
 
Bruno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

High ST is, much to the confusion of some players, a flexible, general utility power, not "just" a combat power. There's a surprising number of problems that can be solved by applying enough Basic Lift to the situation in a creative way. Especially with Comic Book Physics, where picking up something big by one small part of it doesn't make the whole thing collapse. ;)

And of course high ST characters are perfectly capable of throwing cars and such, which gets you +4 to hit for being able to target the area, makes it hard to Dodge because you need enough Step to get out from under the car, and makes a big satisfying smashing sound.

By the way, I have to agree that ranged blasters that haven't spent points on defenses are glass canons, and high value targets that will promptly be shot. As a supervillain, if I see, say, a crunchy Cyclopsoid at 300 yards raining eye-laser powered destruction down on me, and a Wolverine Clone or even Ersatz Hulk at 300 yards running towards me, and I have ranged attacks? I'm going to take a few turns to try and shoot Cyclops because he's the IMMEDIATE problem. Wolverine or the Hulk or whatever will be a problem momentarily, but shooting HIM doesn't stop Cyclops from punching me through six comic panels with a blaster hit. I'd rather live long enough to worry about Wolverine rather than be taken out early.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table
A Wiki for my F2F Group
A neglected GURPS blog
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:19 AM   #7
Dustin
 
Dustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The former Chochenyo territory
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'?
1) On a Supers budget, 30% of hundreds of points is a lot of points.
2) By default, Deceptive Attack is melee only (although in my opinion, a Supers game should go ahead and allow Deceptive ranged attacks).
3) Grappling provides a lot of options that a simple ranged blaster doesn't have, like immobilizing opponents without harming them, grabbing weapons/macguffins, and preventing villains from chasing down your squishy allies. (High levels of TK can do this too, but not cheaply.)
__________________
My gaming blog: Thor's Grumblings
Keep your friends close, and your enemies in Close Combat.
Dustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:22 AM   #8
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
But from a purely rules-oriented PoV, what's the point? A close combatant will get maybe a 30% discount compared to a 'blaster' in terms of point cost of the main attack power, but will get endless opportunities due to being unable to engage opponents at range.
High-end bricks cost less than high-end blasters, if you use the Super-Effort options. That was actually an emulation of the way things work in the comics.

A more distant analogy would be armed forces: you can have all the artillery you want, but sooner or later you have to send the tanks in to take the enemy's ground away from them. Blasters, like artillery, tend to be vulnerable in close quarters fights; they need to be shielded by immobile defenses or by their less vulnerable brick teammates.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:29 AM   #9
Kalzazz
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Oh yes, also Striking ST - My favorite Katana is cheap
Kalzazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 09:31 AM   #10
aesir23
 
aesir23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
Default Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'?
This is really enough. The superhero genre is first and foremost about wish fulfillment. It is secondarily about coolness.

Most of the players I've run in Super's campaigns would MUCH rather run a character that lets them mimic the exploits of Wolverine, Batman*, Spider-Man*, and the Hulk than Cyclops, The Human Torch, or Green Arrow.

Most of the most popular characters in comics either lean towards melee (like Wolverine and most of the Bat-family) or are balanced melee and ranged fighters (Like Captain America and Superman). Range focused and purely ranged fighters (like the Punisher and Green Arrow) are much less popular.



*Yes, I know they have ranged attacks, but they are primarily melee fighters.
aesir23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
balance, melee, supers

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.