07-28-2016, 04:36 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Powers for twins - full communion combat
I'm working on some special powers for twins. The working assumption is that both twins are PCs. Available advantages start with Special Rapport and work up to Telespeak with Shared Senses (not sure full communion would be helpful in combat). Now, how can this be used in combat? Are there any write ups with similar abilities?
Last edited by mukibear; 07-28-2016 at 04:59 AM. |
07-28-2016, 05:18 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Well for a start I'd give them the Shield wall and teamwork perks.
On a broader scope going with the concept of "everyone's invited" for set ups from "delayed gratification" in Pyramid, I'd likely also allow than to both counter attack and riposte off parries that either of them had triggered. (no idea how to cost this up, maybe via techniques, but I likely wouldn't bother to cost it) But specifically at my table I would just allow the two Players as much time as they want to discuss what their characters are doing (in relation to working together) on a second by second basis. Something I don't usually do. Last edited by Tomsdad; 07-29-2016 at 05:13 AM. |
07-28-2016, 06:39 PM | #3 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portsmouth, VA, USA
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Quote:
What sort of powers are you looking for exactly?
__________________
My Twitter My w23 Stuff My Blog Latest GURPS Book: Dungeon Fantasy Denizens: Thieves Latest TFT Book: The Sunken Library Become a Patron! |
|
07-28-2016, 07:12 PM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Quote:
Okay - from the article, Dextro trusts at his opponent's face (-5) and takes an additional -4 for the Set Up. Levo can then follow through with an attack (not at the face) and his opponent is -2 to defend. Dextro parries, Levo does counter attack, but I'm not sure how riposte. Martial Arts is one book I've never dug into. |
|
07-28-2016, 07:16 PM | #5 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jeffersonville, Ind.
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Quote:
__________________
The user formerly known as ciaran_skye. __________________ Quirks: Doesn't proofread forum posts before clicking "Submit". [-1] Quote:
|
||
07-29-2016, 05:06 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Quote:
Normally the Riposte, has to be with the weapon/limb etc you parried with, but in this case I'd let the other twin get the benefit. So you have one twin optimised for defence including choice of manoeuvre and defence options (who parries), the other optimised for attack (who ripostes). It could be pretty powerful, but it does rely on certain things happening *which particular defence depends on what their previous attack was. Another tactic would be if the are using team tactics and going at the same time, I'd allow then to both stop-hit at the same time (but of course only the actual twin who was the initial target would be susceptible to being hit) EDIT: most of the stuff I've mentioned are more useful for two H-t-H fighters working in concert, and it not applicable to a fighter / wizard combo though! Last edited by Tomsdad; 07-29-2016 at 05:37 AM. |
|
07-29-2016, 11:38 AM | #8 |
Join Date: May 2016
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
The first thought that came to mind was abilities that only work when twins are close to each other, and abilities with Limitations based on such.
"Mas y Menos, si podemos!" |
07-29-2016, 12:38 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
I would let them use each others' Feints and Evaluates.
|
07-29-2016, 02:36 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Re: Powers for twins - full communion combat
Flanking would be interesting against these two.
Attacker 1 is standing behind twin A, twin B is close enough for the link to work, is currently un-engaged, and can clearly see the attacker, but is not close enough to engage the attacker - What happens? Now what happens if you change a couple of the modifiers in that sentence? |
|
|