11-29-2007, 06:41 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
If a rival fights two monsters( for whatever reason) and then defeats(or kills)* one of them, and I transfer( by transferal potion) the other monster to myself and kill it(or defeat it) , do I get the treasures from the monster he has defeated ? Does he ?
I would say I do get the treasures because the monster is already defeated and left it's treasures and now you're them to claim them after you beat the second monster. *using charm, draw and strike, polymorph potion |
11-29-2007, 08:01 PM | #2 | ||
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montana, USA
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Keep in mind that the two monsters must be fought together. In normal combat, both monsters would be simultaneously defeated.
In your scenario, you mention that the player in combat gets rid of one of the monsters, such as done by the Polymorph Potion or the Charm ability of the Wizard. The other monster still needs to be defeated, before any Treasure is gained. From the FAQ: Quote:
"Play during any combat. Any other player (your choice) fights the monster(s), may ask for help normally, and gets the treasure and levels if he wins. The original player then resumes his turn, and may loot the room whether the combat was won or lost. Usable once only." It appears as though when this combat shifts to the new player, the Treasure left behind by Polymorph or Charm is left in that combat. If the player to whom the combat was transferred defeats the remaining monster, it would appear that he would get the Level and Treasure from the monster he defeated, plus the Treasure which was left behind from the Polymorphed or Charmed monster. In looking at the wordings, though: Polymorph - "Monster leaves its Treasure behind." Wizard Charm - "Discard the Monster and take its Treasure." The wording on the Wizard card gave me some doubts; but then I read more into the FAQ, which seems to apply: Quote:
__________________
------------------------------------- There are no stupid questions... ...but there are stupid answers! ------------------------------------- |
||
11-30-2007, 02:04 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
I hope we get an official word on this,because this has already happened and is bound to happen again. It would have serisouly changed my last game if the rule is what you said (and I agree), since in the battle two monster were defeated and the third was transfered. I gave the other players the benefit of doubt and did not take the other treasures,since they did not agree with having the treasure transfered.
|
11-30-2007, 07:34 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Macungie, PA
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
That's the kind of play that can ruin everyone's fun if you do it often enough. I've always treated it that since the combat is transferred, everything basically restarts, to a certain degree, and the new combatant only gets the Treasures from the remaining Monster(s) faced. In other words, you only get credit/reward for the things you do yourself. Not always the most munchkinly of attitudes, but one that's fair in the scope of the real world in which we actually exist. . .
|
11-30-2007, 08:14 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Quote:
You take the red pill and you stayin Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes |
|
01-14-2008, 01:29 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Quote:
|
|
01-14-2008, 04:41 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Quote:
|
|
01-14-2011, 08:59 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Evening all, been playing this game for a few days now (played with mates years ago) and recently someone played the tactic you mentiond with a slight variation, in that to win the game my enemy needed two levels and i had just drawn 2 monsters, would you concider using a transferal potion at the begining of battle to take control of the battle and go on to win be a "fair" move. Does a transferal potion allow you to take control of the entire battle? Not sure if this has been discused before but with so many forums and only google to find them i was strugling to find somewhere else.
"An OTHER player of your choice" thats the bit i cant figure out. Thank very much all. |
01-14-2011, 10:00 PM | #9 |
Munchkin Line Editor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
I swear to Cthulhu, I'm going to write an entire FAQ section just on that one damn card.
"Any other player" means "any player other than the one currently fighting." Yes, if you transfer a fight to yourself that would give you enough levels to win the game, and no one is able to stop you, then you win the game. You must transfer the entire fight; you can't transfer some monsters and save others to whup up on yourself.
__________________
Andrew Hackard, Munchkin Line Editor If you have a question that isn't getting answered, we have a thread for that. Let people like what they like. Don't be a gamer hater. #PlayMunchkin on social media: Twitter || Facebook || Instagram || YouTube Follow us on Kickstarter: Steve Jackson Games and Warehouse 23 |
01-15-2011, 10:15 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Re: Defeat one monster+Transferal potion
Neon Rabbit resurrected a fairly old thread here.
While Andrew responded to his specific query, I think something should be pointed out to avoid confusion for the casual readers of this thread. MM suggested in post 4 of this current thread (in 2007) that a player who receives a combat by way of Transferal Potion does not receive treasures from monsters already defeated in the combat. That opinion has been superseded by MM's very clear 2011 ruling (here and here) that the treasures do indeed "travel" with the combat and in fact go to the munchkin who finally resolves the combat. |
Tags |
transferral potion, treasure |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|