09-13-2019, 04:24 AM | #11 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alameda, CA
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
Quote:
__________________
Fraser: "Could you elucidate, sir?" Welsh: "No, no. Not since the late sixties." Ray: "That's Canadian for explain." --- from "due South" episode Seeing Is Believing |
|
09-13-2019, 04:32 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alameda, CA
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
Skills that apply to the subject:
Hiking Soldier Packing - I know it's for pack animals, but men can carry a lot on their backs.
__________________
Fraser: "Could you elucidate, sir?" Welsh: "No, no. Not since the late sixties." Ray: "That's Canadian for explain." --- from "due South" episode Seeing Is Believing |
09-13-2019, 05:56 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
|
09-13-2019, 07:36 AM | #14 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
|
09-13-2019, 08:11 AM | #15 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Luxembourg
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
|
09-13-2019, 09:08 AM | #16 |
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
A big problem with strapping stuff to the outside of your bergen is that it gets caught in … well, everything - foliage, obstacles, transport, other bergens in a stash...
|
09-13-2019, 09:25 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
This situation probably runs into my "You're carrying too much gear!" rule. This usually takes the form of having a very large monster try to kill the PC who suddenly needs to Dodge much more than he needs a frying pan.
Is needing to Dodge monsters actually that much more common than the hazards of not having a frying pan in my games? Yes. I do sometimes do detailed and extensive equipments lists even as a player but the last time I did the party bought 3 camels to load all the stuff onto.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
09-13-2019, 09:55 AM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
Quote:
And being a hireling, I didn't care if they couldn't Dodge or not... /DFclassismintensifies.gif |
|
09-13-2019, 10:10 AM | #19 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
A separate issue: is the reason for packing stuff on the outside lack of space inside, or something else? You might pack something in a different location for accessibility reasons, or because it has particular properties that aren't very compatible with being in with the mass of stuff in the pack (many backpacks have extra small pockets for that type of thing, but your particular pack might not, particularly at lower tech).
|
09-13-2019, 10:47 AM | #20 | |
Join Date: Nov 2016
|
Re: Tying Stuff to Your Backpack
Hey there,
I would focus on 3 points: (1) You will always have penalties because of encumbrance (if weight exceeds your limit). (2) What to roll? (3) What happens after your roll? That said, I agree with Celjabba. I believe soldier, packing, IQ, knock-tying or even survival might help to successfully resolve tying stuff to your bag-pack. Failure means you have issues such as the ones listed by Celjabba. On a critical failure (depending on bag/item’s quality) either something breaks immediately, the bag breaks and spills your stuff in the middle of action, the bag breaks next time you tie something to it, etc. A critical success might prevent you from having certain encumbrance penalties when doing certain activities (maybe because you balanced the weight and you can waive the encumbrance of a few extra pounds), or save you time pulling the stuff you need (fast-draw). As an interesting fact, some bags-packs have manuals/flyers with the tension limits of its anchor points and joints. The stuff I carry is heavy and the weight impacts the life-time of my bag-packs, so it is important checking these. I also agree that bag-quality, strings, locks and specially designed anchor points give you bonuses to resolve successfully tying items. Quote:
I would not double stealth penalties or double the time for taking stuff out of the bag just because you tie something to it; however, I do agree that if the bag pack is over-stuffed it might incur in some penalties regarding time for taking certain things out and encumbrance. But, as I said, if you have experience it is commonplace having your key items at positions that won’t mess with you on emergency. The rest of the stuff can be taken out during down-time (which I believe, won’t matter as much as it would during stressful situations) That said, I happen to have fastened pans/other gear to my backpack (enough to share some thoughts about it). Some pans have 2 handles or (perhaps one handle and a little one on the opposite side). If you are going to tie a pan (or anything else) to your bag, you do not want it to be flying (because it hits you or it hits other stuff as you walk, etc. this means it might hurt you or that you may damage the item); so, you tie your gear close to the main body of the bag (which also aids in balancing weight). In a modern bag (such as the Tectonic PFT 17) you could tie said pan to the upper handle of the bag, and run a string to tie it to the 2 lower main straps. This way, the pan is not going to make noise. And it won’t impede you from taking (most) stuff outside your bag-pack because it has two zippers. Lower-tech bags, designed for carrying stuff, could be as effective as modern ones.
__________________
- 画龍点睛。Hide。 |
|
|
|