|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-28-2017, 05:03 PM | #1 |
World's Worst Detective
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
Hey, guys.
I'm trying to build a power for one of my players and I wanted to price it fairly. Cumulative is a pretty strong enhancement for Affliction, so we agreed to make it take a cumulative -1 penalty for each successive use. Now, this greatly limits the potency of Cumulative, so what would that be worth? +300%? +200%? I know I could hand-wave it, but I don't like to do that if I don't have to. Thanks.
__________________
Raekai's links: My blog about conlanging, GURPS, and other stuff! — Using Knowing Your Own Strength with Conditional Injury Simulating multiple attacks Wildcard Power Pool: a flexible magic/powers system Magic to RPM complete conversion v2 (incomplete) Perussinexian Magic 2 (outdated) |
04-28-2017, 05:56 PM | #2 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portsmouth, VA, USA
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
Quote:
__________________
My Twitter My w23 Stuff My Blog Latest GURPS Book: Dungeon Fantasy Denizens: Thieves Latest TFT Book: The Sunken Library Become a Patron! |
|
04-28-2017, 07:12 PM | #3 | |
World's Worst Detective
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
Quote:
I feel like modeling it off of Hard to Use is unfair, but I might just be biased in this case. Hard to Use is so pitifully small because it gives a flat penalty per use. However, I feel like a cumulative penalty is far more restricting. It's not about how hard it is to make it work, but I feel like it's more about how many times it can work before it fails, which fits closer to something like Limited Use rather than Hard to Use. Again, I might just be biased, so, please, feel free to call me out, but I think there should be a separate limitation for something like that.
__________________
Raekai's links: My blog about conlanging, GURPS, and other stuff! — Using Knowing Your Own Strength with Conditional Injury Simulating multiple attacks Wildcard Power Pool: a flexible magic/powers system Magic to RPM complete conversion v2 (incomplete) Perussinexian Magic 2 (outdated) |
|
04-28-2017, 10:49 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portsmouth, VA, USA
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
Quote:
__________________
My Twitter My w23 Stuff My Blog Latest GURPS Book: Dungeon Fantasy Denizens: Thieves Latest TFT Book: The Sunken Library Become a Patron! |
|
04-29-2017, 06:15 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
I'd personally just use the Increased Immunity -10%/level (from GURPS Power-Ups 8) value and rules, with the tweak that the penalty applies for every successful use rather than every resisted/failed use. It gives you several variations and durations of the cumulative penalty. I've used this tweak for Healing (substituting the -2 with -3) for both Increased Immunity and Decreased Immunity in my games and it works fine.
Granted, this pricing doesn't change the fact that the limitation is minor compared to the price of the cumulative effect, but then again, I personally think cumulative effects are suppose to be powerful an expensive. I think it's fair. As another design alternative, have you considered Limited By Margin limitation? Or I think there's a special "margin-based" limitation or enhancement when we're talking about Affliction? So instead of it being Cumulative, your bonus is based on a margin. You can try again and if you get a better result, it replaces the older one, but a worse result does nothing. Apply the Increased Immunity limitation to that, giving you the cumulative penalty when you succeed, making it more and more unlikely that future roles will get a better result. So there, you only get the -2 limitation without having to pay for Cumulative. Granted, this is NOT quite the same design concept; you're likely to get your best result on the first roll, but it does give a possibility for improvements with further rolls without needing the Cumulative enhancement, and thus at a lower price. Maybe throw in a generic "First use is at half effect, -20%" limitation so that the first roll is always lower, making it more likely for a second or subsequent roll to get a better effect. (The -20% is off the top of my head, based on an Accessibility value, and may not be the right value.) |
04-29-2017, 06:56 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
The "possibly-infinite" is largely illusion, though. Certainly it's true, in that abstract combat-on-an-infinite-featureless-plain sense. But how often does it actually come up that you (a) need an infinite amount of stacking to achieve your goal; (b) have an infinite amount of turns to apply it; and (c) never get a crit fail while doing so?
For judging the cost, it helps to realize that the utility of each successive application has declining utility. The first stack is more valuable than the taking the stack from 9 to 10. And the likelihood of needing that much effect is similarly less. (The mooks will go down quickly regardless.) I'd suggest that 10 applications is approximately "effective infinity" for a combat ability. If you sit in a corner for 10 turns chanting, the other PCs will probably finish off the enemy by the time you're done. 10s combats are rare, at least in my experience, and it's a rough boundary between durations in combat time and out-of-combat time. (Compare the limits on Takes Extra Time.) That number also dovetails with the -10 TDM often used to represent "impossible" (except for those amazing heroic PCs), such as fighting blind. For another example of declining utility, consider the forum discussions on the pricing of Costs FP. Someone will usually make the point that the very first level, taking an ability from "free" to "limited", is much more significant than the 3 or 4th level. "Can use 5 times in combat" isn't that much more limiting than "Can use 10 times in combat" -- especially since once you have a lot of Costs FP abilities, that Energy Reserve starts looking good. Similarly, the first stack of your Cumulative Affliction is often going to be more significant than taking the stack from 5 to 6 levels. The marginal utility of stacks isn't a constant. So, the pricing shouldn't be thought of as linear. (The assumption of linearity is one of the pitfalls in the Either-Or calculation, and one reason it often fails to satisfy people in practice. The math is perfectly sound -- but it does assume that the effects are independent and combined linearly, like regular real numbers. But that's not really true of perceived modifier values. We treat them that way so we can do the math using tools we already know, rather than futzing around with a lot of table lookups and charts for every modifier. And sometimes, that won't work out.) |
04-29-2017, 04:09 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portsmouth, VA, USA
|
Re: Price of Cumulative (+400%) if each successive use takes a cumulative -1 penalty?
Quote:
__________________
My Twitter My w23 Stuff My Blog Latest GURPS Book: Dungeon Fantasy Denizens: Thieves Latest TFT Book: The Sunken Library Become a Patron! |
|
Tags |
affliction, cumulative, enhancement, margin-based margin based, penalty, powers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|