01-15-2017, 02:20 AM | #1 |
Join Date: May 2010
Location: LP City, Maryland
|
Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
Title is awkward.
Anyways, RAW Hiking gives you a 20% bonus to your distance hiked that day if you roll against it successfully and don't have group members holding you back. Thus, if I could normally hike 10 miles, a success means 12 miles. This implies I am moving faster. Should I apply this same rationale to a timed march? That is, the distance per day will always be fixed, and going beyond it isn't really allowed. In these instances should I consider a successful Hiking roll to be adding 20% to my walking speed (IIRC 1/2 of my Basic Move)? Thus, a Basic Move of (FREX) 3 becomes 3.6 on a successful Hiking roll. Good use or not so much? M.
__________________
Blerg: Chain link and concrete |
01-15-2017, 02:31 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
Well, a Basic Move of 3 would get you a daily march of 30 miles. I think that's assumed to be 10 hours, so 3 mph. But 3 mph is roughly 5400 yards per hour, or 1.5 yards per second, which is Move 1.5.
So I don't think your Basic Move is really increasing. Rather, you're coming closer to making full use of it over long distances.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
01-15-2017, 06:41 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Sep 2013
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
As a hiker, I think it makes sense. When you know how to do it better, you are not getting faster, you simply get more "miles per gallon".
If you want more realism, you should take at look at page 55 in High Tech. |
01-15-2017, 06:50 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
I'm going to give an example from my life in video gaming but.
No Hiking is seeing the top of the hill and going in a straight line to the top of the hill, up the 30 degree slope, which is practically a Climbing roll. Hiking is seeing the top of the hill, and taking a second to notice that actually if you go around the hill a bit the slope to the top is much easier. In Skyrim, I'm the first person, not the second :P "Why, this is an impassable cliff! I guess its a jumping puzzle. *grunt huff puff arrives at top of hill* ... there's a lovely path up here on the other side of the hill. With butterflies and flowers and sunshine. Damnit." Other little things: Knowing how to pace yourself. Packing your equipment and dressing such that you don't get as many sore spots so you don't need as many little breaks to fuss with your gear.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog Last edited by Bruno; 01-15-2017 at 08:31 AM. |
01-15-2017, 08:25 AM | #5 |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
Experienced hikers may not be moving substantially faster, but they are moving more steadily. For example, one thing you learn over time is how to pack things to minimize stops for gear: rain protection, food and water, and other items you are likely to need on the trail placed so that you can get at them without taking your pack off.
So you may not moving more yards per second, but you will be spending more seconds on the move per hour.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
01-15-2017, 08:44 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
Quote:
So, for situations where it mattered, I'd think it reasonable to use the bonus to calculate the distance moved in a fixed time, but only when that fixed time is substantial -- at least a couple of hours. You can't use a Hiking bonus in a timed interval like the 100m sprint. |
|
01-15-2017, 11:18 AM | #7 |
Dog of Lysdexics
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
The Hiking rules are not about constant movement, the assume things like rest stops, most of the 20% comes from more efficient rest stops, and better pacing on the move, so that spend lest unnecessary time stopped. and not being slowed down due to trying to keep moving at the 1/3 FP threshold etc
Also remember most people don't hike unencumbered, as it exposes them to all the problems of getting lost and exposure/survival hardships |
01-15-2017, 02:29 PM | #8 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
I only run a mile back from the store, but it's very often that I have to stop and take a minute readjusting whatever the heck is jamming me in the back. And I buy almost the same things each time, so you'd think it would eventually become trivial.
If I tried hiking all day over natural terrain, I can only imagine the frustrating delays I'd cause. Until I put a point or two in Hiking. Then my average speed would jump despite not walking faster when actually walking.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
01-16-2017, 11:46 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
Quote:
Some people walks faster than others. And well trained hikers tend to walk faster than untrained people. |
|
01-17-2017, 12:39 AM | #10 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Hiking: Further, yes, but also faster?
How fast it's physically possible to walk depends entirely on gravity and inseam length. But what speed people prefer is more dependent on fitness and comfort level.
I walk much faster than my girlfriend despite having almost identical leg lengths. I think that normal human lengths mean that 4.25 to 4.5 mph is the maximum before you switch to running or fall over.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
Tags |
hiking |
|
|