12-30-2014, 01:19 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
|
Re: Skills as perks
I could certainly see Crewman and maybe even Soldier as perks. "You do not make an idiot of yourself around a <vessel type>" and "You're acclimatised to the military way of doing stuff and familiar with the standard equipment of <specified army>".
__________________
-- Phil Masters My Home Page. My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG. |
12-30-2014, 01:23 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
|
Re: Skills as perks
I agree that some Skills would be better represented as Perks. But this will not change the number of small-s skills in the system. Perhaps it would be better to acknowledge that skills will often overlap?
I don't think so; most soldiers or sailors would say that there are people who are clearly careful and competent, and people who fumble their way through, and that experience has something to do with it. There are probably estimates out there of how long it took a newly impressed sailor to become competent in the 18th century; if it was more than a month or two of immersion than a Perk feels too cheap.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature |
12-30-2014, 01:26 PM | #13 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Skills as perks
And give an IQ roll for knowledge questions, like Captain America in The Winter Soldier realizing that the ammunitions depot is in the wrong place.
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
12-30-2014, 01:26 PM | #14 | |
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
Perks are binary: you either have 'em or you don't. Skills have a controlling attribute, a difficulty level, often a Tech Level and familarities, optionally prerequisites and specialties, and a numerical level. Fast-Draw (Ammo)/TL8 (DX/Easy)-12 [1] and Perk: Fast-Draw [1] each occupy one line on a character sheet, but one of them has to pack far more information into that line. |
|
12-30-2014, 03:49 PM | #15 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
As someone noted in the recent thread discussing Crewman skill, this is often taken by PCs to indicate that they won't get underfoot when travelling by a given vehicle type, but rarely actually rolled. At some point, one might as well make something like that a perk rather than a full skill. And what can Sailor-18 actually do so much better than Sailor-11?
__________________
-- Phil Masters My Home Page. My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG. |
|
12-30-2014, 04:15 PM | #16 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
For the putting on and/or operating element, being restricted to OTW means you can only be any good at it if you're a genius...and not all suits will necessarily be easy to use. This is a somewhat general problem with the 'perk to attribute level' replacement...even if a skill isn't very broad, a character might want to be competent at it, and attribute level is frequently less than competent. But the bigger problem is that Environment Suit acts as a DX and skill cap..
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
12-30-2014, 04:24 PM | #17 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
|
|
12-30-2014, 06:29 PM | #18 |
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Re: Skills as perks
Agree with many of the ideas here. Certainly there's a lot of overlap between skills and I'd like to see some consolidation.
Gesture seems like either a language of its own (perhaps like a pidgin it caps out, this time at Broken). Or it could simply be an application of Perform that is easy enough to do untrained. If you want to buy it up (say you're playing a mime), then take it as a technique. Fast-draw to me is a hard Technique of the weapon skill of the weapon you're fast-drawing. You lose fast draw (ammo) but to me that's ok. Finance, Market Analysis, and Economics have vast overlap. There are differences in practice, but are they significant enough to matter in game terms? If I were building a financier, I'd take Law (US tax), Accounting, Current Events (business), Math (stats), and Economics. I suppose you could call the package Professional Skill (Financier). I don't see what Market ANalysis or Finance adds that aren't already covered by those other skills. To me skills ought to be mutually exclusive and exhaustive. There should be enough skills to cover everything, but not so many that two skills cover the same ground (or, more often, where two skills cover all the same ground as a third). They should also all be useful for something. There are too many skills that you buy at char gen because you feel like you have to, to fit your character concept, and then never roll in a campaign. Knowledges in particular suffer from both problems-- too much overlap, too little utility. Strategy and Tactics. In theory, I see the difference. In practice, again I don't see how the distinction would come up in-game, and a merge would make sense. Make it /TL since it appears that shifts in technology lead to major changes in military science. Esoteric Medicine should be eliminated. Physician below a certain TL should simply BE those esoteric techniques, that may or may not actually work. (Certainly not in a realistic game). As others have said, the Armor encumbrance rules need an overhaul-- and that includes NBC and Vacc suits, which are after all armor for environmental conditions. I'm fine with the Bard and Ninja skills, but why not separate them out into their chapter or section (Powers as Skills). |
12-30-2014, 09:02 PM | #19 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-31-2014, 04:35 PM | #20 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Skills as perks
Quote:
When you're using a ship, Crewman is an important skill for your mass of crew doing massed activities to work the ship, and maybe for a helmsman. Those are most likely NPC roles, though, and don't individually do much of interest. But when you're operating within a ship, Crewman means knowing how to deal with that environment. A good crewman knows where things are and all the ways to get there from here (or can make informed guesses on an unfamiliar ship), and knows how to interact with most of the myriad devices along the way. Having that at high levels isn't much needed if all you want to do is not embarrass yourself while puttering around on your own ship under normal conditions. But in a shipboard crisis, it could be vital. Quote:
Capping might not be best mechanic, but I don't think it's as bad as you say. Actually, exporting that component to a Technique might make it a bit nicer for people who have some DX-based skills raised well above DX...
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
Tags |
perks, skills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|