07-12-2013, 07:16 AM | #71 | |
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
|
|
07-12-2013, 07:59 AM | #72 | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The plutonium rich regions of Washington State
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
(1) Do not accumulate HP of damage. Only use the injury caused to determine bleeding, stunning, knockdown, major wounds, and so on. This has the obvious disadvantage that you can never chop down a large tree with an axe, houses never burn down, and so on. (2) Quadratic HP (QHP). All injury thresholds (major wounds, roll for unconsciousness, etc) are found by taking the RAW value and squaring them (so 5 points for a major wound and 10 for starting unconsciousness rolls RAW becomes 25 and 100, respectively). Square all rolled damage, and subtract the square of the DR of any armor in the way. For injury, multiply the basic damage squared by the square of the wound multiple (i.e., 0.25 for Pi-; 1 for Pi, cr, or tox, or cor; ~2 for Pi+ or cut; 4 for Pi++ or imp). Accumulate only the squared injury. For example, if Our Hero with 12 HP suffers crushing wounds with damage rolls of 3, 4, 7, and 3, we would subtract 9, 12, 49, and 9 from his QHP of 144, leaving him with 65 QHP. He will suffer a major wound, but is otherwise not in danger of passing out like he would be with linear HP. QHP has two advantages - it is a more realistic representation of armor penetration for most weapons, and avoids unrealisticly rapid accumulation of injury. QHP scales as an area, which is justifiable since many forms of damage are proportional to an area (severity of burns depends on area of skin affected, breaking a structural element like a bone or entire limb is proportional to the cross sectional area of the element, injury from a penetrating wound is reasonably modeled as its depth times its width). (3) Cubic HP. If QHP still accumulates injury too fast, you can cube HP instead. This simulates your boiling away a volume of water example. (4) Various house rules, such as http://panoptesv.com/RPGs/HouseRules/wounds.html . Luke |
|
07-12-2013, 08:12 AM | #73 | |
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
That may well be in your linked house rules; it's not terribly odd for GURPS. But there's more there, I think.
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
|
07-12-2013, 08:39 AM | #74 | |
Careful Wisher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oregon, WI
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
1) We do have to strike a balance between playability and the underlying science. One of the continued problems that non GURPS players have with the system is that it is too realistic, and thus too easy for characters to die. 2) One of the reasons that players do like GURPS is that it folds in more of that science than other systems. That's for certain. My gaming group currently consists of a PhD Raman Spectroscopist, PhD nuclear chemist, PhD in Engineering (I think) who writes medical software, another guy who writes medical software, a BS level oceanographer, and a guy who assembles particle accelerators for a living. Oh, and I have a MS in Genetics, I've been well-known in Forensic DNA circles for about a decade now. In all due fairness, it may not be a science textbook (but then, how much fun would a science text book be? I've got tons of 'em, and I still use my GURPS Books). 3) When any game, TV series, movie wanders into an area of science where we have expertise, especially deep expertise, it does become painful to see how far off of our understood reality it can be. I cannot watch "CSI" for this reason, even though some of the products that I've designed have actually been featured on those shows. Too painful. Makes my science brain itch with the hurty. So, yeah. It's a game.... and there's nothing wrong with that. -P
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ P. Mandrekar, Geneticist and Gamer Rational Centrist "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts"- Daniel P. Moynihan |
|
07-12-2013, 09:34 AM | #75 | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The plutonium rich regions of Washington State
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
(Or alternately, a house with HP of, oh, 200 - how much does a house weigh, anyway - is on fire, and taking 1d-1 burn damage each second. How does the fire get a large enough blow to reduce the house's HT?). Luke |
|
07-12-2013, 09:54 AM | #76 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
I think LWCamps idea about squaring is good in principle but too complicated to play out as a good solution.
I like the IT:DR or dividing damage option better, especially as we have mechanics for that. What would that look like or is it possible to come up with similar results? ie. How much of a divisor is needed to achieve reasonable results for say the naval ships were talking about? Another thing that came to mind is using Supernatural Durability as a model. Achilles heal canon fire or fire and you have ships that cant be sunk by muskets and are still hard to hurt with cannon fire, especially combined with higher DR and damage reduction. I doubt I am a majority but to me the rules need to be set up so that they can be lumped into advantages or rule exemption perks (possibly with high UB cost). If this is not done then it is impossible to build certain types of chrecters to match and that makes me a sad panda.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
07-12-2013, 09:57 AM | #77 | |
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
I'm going to noodle on this more. One day it'll turn up somewhere, I think. :-)
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
|
07-12-2013, 10:10 AM | #78 |
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
|
07-12-2013, 11:42 AM | #79 | |||
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There is a reason, beyond pedantry, to figure out these sorts of stats properly, and it's to be generic. Yes, we can look in history texts and we've all seen Pirates of the Caribbean or Master and Commander, so if needed we can handwave how many cannon shots a ship can survive or how long it takes to sink one. The problem is that most of the games I'm involved in are horribly cross-genre, so there's no frame of reference for guessing the effects. What if a galleon is 500 yards from an underwater nuclear blast? Can a mini-gun destroy a ship of the line? Would a TL5 broadside have any effect against a TL8 USS Nimitz? How many of Green Lantern's energy blasts does it take to stop a ghost sloop floating down Wall St before it puts a hole in a bank vault? Using extra-effort? We must rely on game mechanics to give a ballpark figure. No, I wouldn't game out each second of an extended attack, but I'd use damage averages to guesstimate the results I'm looking for. And if it's things like supers vs tall ships, then turn-by-turn combat might in fact be necessary.
__________________
Collaborative Settings: Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting! Last edited by Daigoro; 07-12-2013 at 11:48 AM. Reason: added context quotes |
|||
07-12-2013, 11:46 AM | #80 | |
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: 4E's hit point philosophy
Quote:
__________________
-apoc527 My Campaigns Currently Playing: GURPS Banestorm: The Symmetry of Darkness Inactive: Star*Drive: 2525-Hunting for Fun and Profit My THS Campaign-In the Shadows of Venus Yrth--The Legend Begins The XCOM Apocalypse |
|
Tags |
damage, hit points |
|
|