Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2020, 02:16 PM   #41
dcarson
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin View Post

Every US armed service has to have its' separate force of Spec Ops (except maybe the Coast Guard).
Maritime Safety and Security Team
dcarson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2020, 02:56 PM   #42
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

However, the Space Force hasn't had enough time (or budget, or anything) to acquire its own SpecOps group.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2020, 07:04 PM   #43
jason taylor
 
jason taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
However, the Space Force hasn't had enough time (or budget, or anything) to acquire its own SpecOps group.
Isn't it mostly theoretical at the moment? Sure it can concentrate on orbital dominance and cyber dominance, but so far most the idea of a massive armada dominating the system, let alone several systems in the Honor Harrington manner is hardly in the works.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison
jason taylor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2020, 07:17 PM   #44
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason taylor View Post
Isn't it mostly theoretical at the moment?
Yes, another reason it doesn't have its own Spec Ops.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2020, 08:23 PM   #45
Fred Brackin
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcarson View Post
I expected that. I just didn't know where to start searching.
__________________
Fred Brackin
Fred Brackin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2020, 09:28 AM   #46
jason taylor
 
jason taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Speaking of the Coast Guard a Beachmaster would be a dangerous job. He has to walk around with a bullhorn while the marines could take a breath once they reached cover. In the US Service a lot of Beachmasters in WW2 were coasties.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison
jason taylor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2020, 07:59 AM   #47
Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tessen View Post
Scottish Highlanders...the Bagpipe guy. Shoot him then is there another guy to pick up the tune?
Possibly. Piping wouldn't be an unknown skill among highlanders, although highland units weren't composed exclusively of highlanders. It might be different with a lowlander unit. [While not hard and fast rules, units designated Scottish as opposed to Highland are lowlanders and wear trews rather than kilts, though by WWII kilts were losing favour, as expensive and not providing adequate protection against chemical attacks.]

The Germans, at least, had learned in WWI that shooting the piper was one of "those really bad ideas" that sounded good at the time. After they shot a couple of pipers and had the highland units involved do a "take no prisoners" on the offending units, the Germans stopped doing it.

As an aside, pipers (but bandsmen in general, regardless of whose side they were on) had another duty beyond that of military musician. They were also unit first aiders/stretcher bearers and entitled to wear red armbands marking them as such while so employed. Stretcher bearers weren't a protected class under the Geneva Convention allowing them to wear Red Cross/Red Crescent armbands marking their status, but the red armbands were intended to forestall any "well, I didn't know that's what he was doing, did I?" defense from someone who did shoot a stretcher bearer.
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2020, 08:35 AM   #48
Dencat
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Forward observers had notoriously short lifespans, although it would be unusual to see one on patrol except maybe scouting for easily identifiable target points before advance.
They usually hung around radiomen making them easily identifiable and had(and have) unhealthy habit of keeping their heads up when shells started falling.
Dencat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2020, 08:39 AM   #49
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: WW2 Which job would be most dangerous?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
Yes, another reason it doesn't have its own Spec Ops.
Of course, the Space Corps could well be one of those rare organisations that employs operators before it employs regular field units. Recruitment could be an issue as the gap from chairborne to snake eating is liable to prove an obstacle...
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
wwii


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.