|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2018, 11:59 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Psionic Ward
|
Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
A burning attack with incendiary 4 (Power-Ups 4, page 19) can ignite "metal" with 1 point of burning damage. Many metals require extremely high temperatures to ignite and burn extremely hot [1]. Would an iron bar ignited by such a burning attack create a fire that is much more damaging than an "ordinary fire" (B433 doing damage of "1d-1 per second"), or would it somehow be a 'magical' fire that can somehow burn things a low-temperature flame never could without doing more damage?
[1] See Thermal Lance |
10-08-2018, 03:28 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
It's pretty magical to ignite steel with 1 point of damage, so I wouldn't expect realistic results. I'd go with the normal 1d-1
|
10-08-2018, 04:30 PM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Quote:
The Cosmic isn't increasing the damage done, it's modifying the property of the material being lit on fire (or just supplying fire somehow). |
|
10-08-2018, 06:21 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: God's Own Country
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Some of it depends on the description explaining Incend 4. It can easily be something like, "this heat attack also feeds pure oxygen or fluorine to be able to ignite anything touched" I'd rule the higher damage as it is actually a special fire now.
Or think of the attack being 'a squirt of clorine trifluoride'; the attack is burning acid, and the fire is special and super-hot. Also gives off toxic and corrosive smoke, but that's a secondary aura effect. Note: do not use a chlorine trifluoride attack on a water elemental....
__________________
Paul May | MIB 1138 (on hiatus) |
10-08-2018, 06:26 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
It's also not a 1 point burning attack.
|
10-08-2018, 06:28 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: God's Own Country
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
? I'm basing this on the original question. He's after wa way to get the effect described. Adding an environmental modifier (added oxygen) doesn't change the stated 1 pt damage to start the fire.
__________________
Paul May | MIB 1138 (on hiatus) |
10-08-2018, 06:32 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Quote:
Realistically, all methods of setting bulk metal on fire with small amounts of energy involve the attack having other components that are themselves worth points, often quite a few points. Given that incendiary 4 is already a magical effect, the question is what's a reasonable benefit for the points spent, and comparing the cost to Cyclic, the answer is 'not very much damage'. Last edited by Anthony; 10-08-2018 at 06:40 PM. |
|
10-08-2018, 07:09 PM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Quote:
Not "Now it sets anything on fire that then does as much damage as would have been required to set it on fire without this special attack". |
|
10-08-2018, 07:36 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Right, it's the standard 1d-1.
|
10-09-2018, 07:08 AM | #10 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Fires started with Incendiary 4 (PU4 p19) - extremely hot when igniting iron?
Quote:
The description of the modifier seems pretty clear. Quote:
Trying to extrapolate everything that might "logically" happen from real-world chemistry and physics is just going to be a trail of tears -- and most likely invalidate your magical/super-power anyway, if you actually followed all the threads to their logical conclusion and applied the same rigor to being able to generate the effect to start with. Selective "realism" isn't realism. |
||
|
|