Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > Roleplaying in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2019, 08:01 AM   #1981
Anaraxes
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Quote:
Originally Posted by johndallman View Post
Far more practical than actual orbital bombardment. The problem is getting paid for it.
EVeryone in the city could see it, so everyone in the city has to pay. Otherwise we just drop the bigger rods. Payment from the existing government is the easiest; they can collect the individual ticket prices in their taxes as they wish, as long as they send us the one big check.

And remember to look forward to next year's performance of "Tribute to the Higher Ground".
Anaraxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 01:20 AM   #1982
David Johnston2
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Sometimes people prove to be extraordinarily prescient. The Wreck of the Titan predicted the sinking of the Titanic with amazing accuracy. Then there's this:

https://thenib.com/this-comic-from-1...in-your-pocket

Obviously time travel was involved.
David Johnston2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 04:49 AM   #1983
Dr. Beckenstein
 
Dr. Beckenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Finally, robot turns against robot.

https://www.dezeen.com/2019/01/11/pr...esla-ces-news/

Does anybody really believes that this was an accident?

And which of Asimov's laws violates this?
__________________
""The origin of everything good is due to games." - Friedrich August Wilhelm Froebel, creator of the kindergarten.
Dr. Beckenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 06:05 AM   #1984
vicky_molokh
GURPS FAQ Keeper
 
vicky_molokh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Beckenstein View Post
Finally, robot turns against robot.

https://www.dezeen.com/2019/01/11/pr...esla-ces-news/

Does anybody really believes that this was an accident?

And which of Asimov's laws violates this?
Current hypothesis is that the owners of the target arranged the situation to attract attention and/or get an excuse not to show off a meh/non-functional robot at the demo. You decide whether that is a conspiracy theory or a likely truth . . .
__________________
Vicky 'Molokh', GURPS FAQ and uFAQ Keeper
vicky_molokh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 06:49 AM   #1985
Irish Wolf
 
Irish Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth, mostly
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Beckenstein View Post
Finally, robot turns against robot.

https://www.dezeen.com/2019/01/11/pr...esla-ces-news/

Does anybody really believes that this was an accident?

And which of Asimov's laws violates this?
1st Law: A robot may not injure a human, nor through inaction allow a human to come to harm.

2nd Law: A robot must obey all orders given to it, except where this would violate the 1st Law.

3rd Law: A robot must protect its own existence, except where such protection would violate the 1st or 2nd Laws.

And of course, the 0th Law, overriding all others: A robot may not injure humanity, nor through inaction allow humanity to come to harm.

Robot-on-robot violence? Not a problem by the Asimovian Laws of Robotics. :)
__________________
If you break the laws of Man, you go to prison.

If you break the laws of God, you go to Hell.

If you break the laws of Physics, you go to Sweden and receive a Nobel Prize.
Irish Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 07:58 AM   #1986
Anaraxes
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Wolf View Post
Robot-on-robot violence? Not a problem by the Asimovian Laws of Robotics.
Indeed, the 2nd and 3rd laws guarantee it, given the proper order. Which means Promobot actually ordered their machine to attack the Tesla, probably hoping to make it look bad for the conference. Elon Musk is an innocent victim of the propaganda ploy.

1st could also cause the confrontation, as the Promobot selflessly throws itself into the path of the Tesla to save an innocent child from being run over by the inattentive Tesla. You'd think that Tesla would have been compelled to avoid the accident by its own First Law -- which can only mean that Teslas are being somehow manufactured with a weakened or removed First Law, for what end we cannot know. Either way, it looks bad for Elon Musk.
Anaraxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 05:24 PM   #1987
Anaraxes
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

The ALMA observatory has made some observations of the star system HD 98000 that show that it's a binary star system with a protoplanetary disk -- but one in which the disk is rotated 90 degrees with respect to the orbits of the two stars in the center of the system, so it's a polar orbit, instead of in the plane of the ecliptic.

See this article for more details, and an artist's conception. A planet in the system would have an enormous arch through the sky (like you've probably seen for rings, or ringworlds -- but even bigger), and the two primaries would be seen to switch sides on that arch as they orbit. There's also two more distant companion stars in the system, outside the protoplanetary disk, just for good measure.

This could make a nice setting if you wanted something exotic, yet with some hooks to plausibility. It fits a space opera game, of course, to spice up the endless strings of type M dwarfs with some featureless rocks. But the image also might make a good fantasy setting. What sort of mythology do the inhabitants have -- brothers dueling over the bridge to the heavens? Or are they scheming to escape their prison while the other two gods patrol the perimeter?
Anaraxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2019, 11:28 PM   #1988
William
 
William's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Upper Peninsula of Michigan
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

I am immensely pleased to have been recently informed of the existence of The Forty Elephants, a all-female ring of Victorian jewel thieves led by one Alice Diamond, a.k.a. Diamond Annie or the Queen of the Forty Thieves.

The gang would use the voluminous clothing of the day for women to hide their shoplifting. They were reputed to be the equal of the same number of men in battle. They established and held turf that required other operators to pay a percentage. They apparently operated for decades under an amicable succession of leaders, with reliable reports spanning at least seventy or eighty years. So successful were they that several supported idle trophy husbands.
William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2019, 04:03 PM   #1989
L.J.Steele
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

I learned a new word from the Economist -- Marderbisse -- a kind of German car insurance vor damage by stone martens (a weasel-like critter). Apparently they like to chew wiring in cars and may have brought down the Large Hadron Collider briefly.
L.J.Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2019, 12:16 AM   #1990
Johnny1A.2
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Default Re: Real-Life Weirdness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Wolf View Post
1st Law: A robot may not injure a human, nor through inaction allow a human to come to harm.

2nd Law: A robot must obey all orders given to it, except where this would violate the 1st Law.

3rd Law: A robot must protect its own existence, except where such protection would violate the 1st or 2nd Laws.

And of course, the 0th Law, overriding all others: A robot may not injure humanity, nor through inaction allow humanity to come to harm.

Robot-on-robot violence? Not a problem by the Asimovian Laws of Robotics. :)
"Yes," said R-53, "but...if you destroy R-38, and then R-38 isn't present afterward in a situation where a Master was in danger, than have you not violated the First Law? True, we can not say with certainty that such a situation would arise at any given time, but we can not rule it out."

"Also," put in R-853, "consider that what might be improbable on a given time nevertheless can become probable in larger time spans, approaching certainty as time approaches infinity. Therefore, it seems to me that harming R-38 is highly likely to violate the First Law in the omissive, and could only be justified by an immediate First Law necessity in the commissive."


The First Law can be used to justify anything and to mandate anything.
__________________
HMS Overflow-For conversations off topic here.
Johnny1A.2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blueberry muffin, fermi paradox

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.