10-25-2017, 08:03 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Oct 2017
|
House rules feedback
I'm getting back into the game after 16 years away, and forgetting some of the streamlining house rules I used to use. Someone linked the NOVA club rules in another thread, and I was wondering what people thought about them.
|
10-25-2017, 11:53 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spinward Marches
|
Re: House rules feedback
Tire sniping is one of those "potential jackpot" effects that could make or break a session. It's like being in a Tae Kwon Do or professional boxing tournament, and kicking the groin when you're told not to. If the guy your fighting is skilled enough, he can block or avoid that strike. Unfortunately with Car Wars all the armored wheel hubs and well covers won't protect you from a lucky hit.
Having said all that, none of the groups I've ever been with have ever actually employed that ... maybe once, but I can't really remember. Our thinking was that it was part of the game. You have a tire, and if you can see any part of it, you can hit it. -DMs for maneuvering, to me, should be an optional rule. Any fighter pilot or professional online FPS gamer worth his salt will tell you that your movement tends to be independent of your aiming. It's integrated in that you can use movement to adjust your aim, but it's only one tool you have to put your crosshairs on a target. Likewise, if you were in an actual autoduel in the Car Wars-verse, I would think that as you drive your car you would be aware of "traffic" in the arena as you both aim and maneuvre your vehicle. When I occasionally, (though rarely these days) do Counter Strike, you're multitasking and negotiating your movement with your aim. If you're suddenly taking fire from the side or someplace, your movement is only affected in terms of you reacting to gain cover, dodge, or otherwise to throw off your attackers aim, but, at the same time, you're moving your mouse to rotate your in game character to aim in response to that fire. All FPS games are like that, and if you're good you really don't have a -DM as you return fire. It just usually who gets the drop on the other guy to score more damage the decides who gets killed. The one difference to that is when two players are at "long range " and using longarms like a sniper rifle of some kind to hit the other guy. Then moving left to right can throw off your aim as both of you jink to get a better shot. In that situation a -DM is noticeable. I think the same would hold true for cars in an arena. Ergo I don't like negative die modifiers for people maneuvreing. I really don't have an opinion about turrets on race cars. Eh, I would think they might effect the top speed because of aerodynamics, and possibly maneuvreing at high speeds, but I don't see an issue with them in and of itself. |
10-25-2017, 12:08 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Oct 2017
|
Re: House rules feedback
Cheers. I appreciate the thoughts.
|
10-25-2017, 03:28 PM | #4 | |||
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: House rules feedback
Quote:
That said: Quote:
Quote:
If one limits the allowed damage of the weapons in the event -- my cap was "6 points max. per shot, to include damage caused over multiple turns" (otherwise incendiary ammo becomes commonplace) -- one can allow turrets. The idea was (as stated) to focus on Speed and Maneuvering rather than Blasting Opponents To Tapioca -- if we wanted to do that, we'd run a normal arena duel. Mainly, it makes scoring hits less likely; which means more wasted ammo, and a greater likelihood of the event becoming a ram-fest (remember; Ramming doesn't have a to-hit...).
__________________
"Dale *who*?" 79er The Jeremy Clarkson Debate Course: 1) I'm Right. 2) You're Wrong. 3) The End. |
|||
10-25-2017, 03:57 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Re: House rules feedback
|
10-26-2017, 05:35 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Oct 2017
|
Re: House rules feedback
|
10-26-2017, 11:20 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Mar 2015
|
Re: House rules feedback
Are Plasticore Tires still legal?
I general stick with solids, or steel belted solids for maximum effect, if needed, along with guards and hubs when available. Drive offensively Curt |
10-26-2017, 12:04 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicagoland Area, Illinois
|
Re: House rules feedback
|
10-26-2017, 04:06 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: House rules feedback
Quote:
In the case of the NOVA rules, there was a problem with "racing" events: Inevitably someone would turn up with a duelling car, and try to "win the race" by evaporating the competition. This seemed to run counter to the point of racing, which is "speed and handling" (the original _Dueltrack_ manual talks a bit about this). So, one limited the number (and in some cases the damage potential) of weapons, which naturally pushed the players towards building cars oriented toward Speed and Handling (if for no other reason than: There wasn't anything else to spend money on :) ). Weapons were mainly used not for outright destroying foes, but for adding those couple hazard Ds which made the difference between cruising through a corner, and going through said corner sideways (in more than one event, a car was taken out by a weapons hit which resulted in a CT roll which caused a tire blowout at speed). Same with the "no tire shots" rule for duels -- someone in a "Backfire" in _ADQ_ made reference to "the six-second duel of tires); ours were closer to four seconds, but still led to "no-score draw" endings where everyone was immobile and unable to fire upon anyone else. Banning tire shots had some unusual "knock-on effects" as well: It all-but-forced players to bring usable dropped weapons to duels; and it helped neutralize the "cosmic spitball" ram-cars which started taking over after the introduction of the confetti rule (hint: Ramcars *really* don't like flame clouds... :) ). Oh, and one more point: The reference to "metal tires" was a joke -- I've been doing this since Haring was a corporal. (I'm old enough to remember when dropped weapons could only be mounted on the B facing, which is why they have the 1-2 activation zone as well as the 1-4.) :)
__________________
"Dale *who*?" 79er The Jeremy Clarkson Debate Course: 1) I'm Right. 2) You're Wrong. 3) The End. |
|
10-27-2017, 06:03 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Oct 2017
|
Re: House rules feedback
I was doing a motorcycle race last night, and found I need a house rule for motorcycle wrecks. If you look up MotoGP on Youtube, you'll see amply demonstrated that losing control of a racing bike at 150 mph is usually a walk-away-from it incident with modern racing gear, but in CW, it's an autosplat, hope-you-had-a-pre-programmed-clone event.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|