03-09-2020, 05:18 PM | #1 |
World's Worst Detective
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
Hey, all.
There have been a couple of similar threads in the past, but I think this one is the closest to what I'm talking about. Unfortunately, the question didn't seem to get entirely resolved. I'm looking to find or make something that might work like a Defensive Beat or an Aggressive Parry with a weapon. Or to be dissuaded from doing such a thing. It seems like a Parry in GURPS represents a static block with a weapon. But what if I want an active or striking Parry? Sure, sure. I could just leave that up to flavor, but I don't want to (unless it's really the "right" option). Why? Now, I'm merely a dabbler when it comes to martial arts. However, one thing that I have been really interested in (when it comes to swords) are why some swords have large guards while others have small ones. From the research that I've done, it seems like the jury is still out on that, but there are a couple of practical proposals I'm interested in. For European swords, large guards seem to appear more when shields (a) are used closer to the body and/or (b) shields are used less often. For Asian swords, the disc-shaped guard might have to do with the styles of martial arts, specifically the type of parry. Again, these are not my personal assertions, but they make sense to me, and, if they make sense, I want to expand on that. My proposal is an Aggressive/Beating/Striking Parry. Just the same as the unarmed Aggressive Parry, the default would be Parry-1, and it would be a Hard technique. Now, it seems steep to require penalties to hit the incoming weapon as the unarmed Aggressive Parry does because a Beat does not require it and a normal armed Parry does not require it. (At worst, I would go with halving the penalties.) Either the Quick Contest of a Beat could ensue or I might do something more fun like roll damage like an Aggressive Parry, then, if your damage is more than the incoming attack, the attacker suffers lowered defenses like a Beat. (I would consider the -3 to defending damage like the unarmed Aggressive Parry, and I'm not sure about the ratio of damage to lowered defenses, but I would probably go with 1:1, especially if I preserve that -3 to damage.) If it makes sense and helps to balance things, I was also considering that the defender would be at a small penalty to their next attack if they miss their Parry (which is a bit more significant if you have players call their Active Defense before the attack rolls to hit). The last bit of my proposal would be to give weapons with a disc-shaped (or otherwise small) guard (e.g., katana, jian, dao) a -1 to Parry unless they use this Aggressive/Beating/Striking Parry. Maybe I'm overthinking it. If I'm off but not too off, I still think it could be an interesting way to help further differentiate those martial arts. Though, as someone with minimal German longsword fencing and Taiji fencing experience, I don't have much knowledge or stake in the game. I'd love to hear your thoughts! Thanks!
__________________
Raekai's links: My blog about conlanging, GURPS, and other stuff! — Using Knowing Your Own Strength with Conditional Injury Simulating multiple attacks Wildcard Power Pool: a flexible magic/powers system Magic to RPM complete conversion v2 (incomplete) Perussinexian Magic 2 (outdated) Last edited by Raekai; 03-09-2020 at 05:32 PM. |
03-10-2020, 12:07 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
The distinction being how doing the unarmed Aggressive Parry (boxing/brawling/karate only) gives you the option to try to damage a weapon, but the built-in ARMED version only gives you the option to try to damage unarmed attackers?
|
03-10-2020, 01:02 PM | #3 |
World's Worst Detective
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
To be more specific, I'm talking about a weapon vs. weapon Aggressive Parry. The normal Aggressive Parry is for unarmed vs. unarmed. The "free" Aggressive Parry is how a Parry with a weapon works against an unarmed attack. Now, I'm trying to figure out a similar mechanic (like a defensive Beat) for a weapon vs. weapon Parry.
__________________
Raekai's links: My blog about conlanging, GURPS, and other stuff! — Using Knowing Your Own Strength with Conditional Injury Simulating multiple attacks Wildcard Power Pool: a flexible magic/powers system Magic to RPM complete conversion v2 (incomplete) Perussinexian Magic 2 (outdated) |
03-10-2020, 03:58 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
Quote:
A more detailed GURPS might have rules where handguards make low-damage hits to the Hand or Forearms a less likely outcome in combat without a shield, but improving the GURPS combat rules without adding complexity (or creating big problems in matches like 'giant robot vs. dragon in freefall') is hard.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature Last edited by Polydamas; 03-10-2020 at 04:01 PM. |
|
03-11-2020, 10:07 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
It's for unarmed vs ANYTHING, specific penalties are listed if you want to target an attacker's weapon.
I think it would make sense to allow Aggressive Parry (-1 to parry) for the benefit of weapons being able to attack other weapons. It just feels a little off since they're paying the same -1 to only opt-in one category (weapons) since unarmed attacks are already opted-in targets. It might work better if we didn't give weapons a free attack on unarmed attackers and made them pay the -1 for Aggressive Parry. We could assume those who are parrying without taking the -1 block with the flat, the guard, the non-tip, etc. Would that be too big a game-changer? It seems like the 2nd component of what you want to do is just replacing "hit causes damage" with "hit causes Beat" on Aggressive Parry. The only substitution example I can remember is the suggestion of creating a punch-like 'slap' for sumo based on replacing it's 'shove'. Which was -1 to skill. Charging -1 to substitute a shove for a punch or a punch for a shove makes me think charging -1 to substitute a beat for either feels right. To be -2 to damage (as aggressive parry is compare to a punch) is basically like -4 to ST though, so the Beat perhaps ought to be -4 to ST in the Quick Contest? It only feels right to allow this with Beats though, not Ruses or classic non-contact Feints. |
03-12-2020, 07:22 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
I practice, and teach, HEMA, so I can say that defensive Beats (parries designed to knock your opponent's weapon aside and create an opening) absolutely ARE a thing IRL (this is the whole point of most "falso" parries in Italian sword fighting styles). In fact, I'd argue that they're as common and much safer than offensive beats.
I'd love to see them represented in GURPS. One way you can do this RAW is with Stop Hit or Riposte. I don't see any reason why the attack portion of those actions couldn't be a Beat. You could apply the defense penality from Riposte to your opponent's roll in the contest. I could also see creating a new technique that combines a parry and beat into a single action--this would be the most realistic approach, but it has play balance implications, since it would allow you to beat and immediately attack into your opponents reduced defenses without having to take an AoA.
__________________
My ongoing thread of GURPS versions of DC Comics characters. |
03-13-2020, 11:09 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
Quote:
If we view a basic attack and basic beat as equally hard to do (they both use up one attack) then a free punch at -4 to ST would be comparable to a free beat at -4 to ST. We'd already be dropping one major benefit of Aggressive Parry (the attacker being counter-attacked can't defend against it) so charging the full -4 might actually be too harsh. Maybe it should only be -3 to make up for the foe getting to resist the Beat? |
|
03-13-2020, 06:10 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
Quote:
In real life, I don't think there should be a ST penalty at all--this should be an effective thing to try against someone whose just as strong or stronger than you are. Perhaps a better approach to balancing it would just to make the technique harder. Hard at -6 to skill would approximate a rapid strike, but since this is a parry we call that -3.
__________________
My ongoing thread of GURPS versions of DC Comics characters. |
|
03-15-2020, 03:21 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Defensive Beats? Aggressive Parry with a weapon?
Quote:
That can be broken into : -1 either way AND the worst of: -2 to damage or -1 per die MA90 gives "+4 to default for -2 damage or -1 damage per die, whichever is worse" "+2 to default for -1 damage" This means that Aggressive Parry's attack basically has a +6 built into it... Which seems to make sense since it's kind of like the -6 you would get from a rapid strike for taking an extra attack? The confusing part is of course that Aggressive Parry isn't actually and offensive technique using MA90-91, it's a defensive technique which would be built using MA91-MA92... That doesn't actually list a component from which you'd build Aggressive Parry, so the best i can figure is taking -1 to a defence gives you a "Special Benefit" of making an undefendable attack at -6, and then you can modify that attack using normal rules. In AP's case, buying off that -6 by taking +6 in reduced damage. Some other rules which seem to apply built into Aggressive Parry's attack 1) only the body part you parried can be targeted 2) any penalties to defend against a body part apply as a penalty to target that body part (example the -2 boxing has to punch a foot or leg, which normally would not apply) 3) any penalties to defend against a weapon apply to target the weapon (example: the -3 boxing/brawling have to target swung weapons) 4) an additional -3 to target weapons on top of that Other restrictions to the defence overall: A) hand offered instead of arm as alternate choice on failed parry to unimpeded attackerMaybe if you bought off those drawbacks, aggressive parry would cost -3 instead of -1? TG42's Grabbing Parry seems to support that. It's -2 (-1 worse than aggressive parry) but does not appear to prohibit a retreat. It has some other restrictions (like can't be used to defend against improvement attempts on existing grapples) but I don't know if Aggressive Parry would be allowed against that anyway. It has the same basic -3 for weapons with additional -3 against swung for non-judo/karate arts. A neat added option where you can bypass the attacking weapon to grab a limb (penalty based on weapon size) which I don't think Aggressive Parry enjoys. Probably paid for by taking damage (possibly MOS-mitigable) on even successful parries against swung weapons. The advantage Wrestling/Sumo has there is they can spread that swung-weapon-damage across 2 limbs (less likely to get crippled, maybe result in 0 damage if you had DR, not sure if 1/2 rounds up to 1 or down to 0) but that's balanced out by them losing their normally superior CP for a 2H grapple since you get 0.5xST regardless of hands. |
|
Tags |
aggressive parry, beat, guard, martial arts, parry |
|
|