11-08-2014, 03:05 PM | #1 |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Fragmented States of America circa 1930
The background for an upcoming campaign involves the collapse of the US into multiple states some time in the 20s, after a worse Great War and Spanish flu (but not apocalyptically so). It doesn't need to be completely plausible, but I'd like at least some broad strokes of how the lines would be drawn in the resulting new countries. A couple things I intend to feature:
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. Last edited by RyanW; 11-09-2014 at 01:18 PM. Reason: Spelling correction |
11-08-2014, 03:18 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
While not fully detailed, if you can get your hands on any Crimson Skies source material it might be useful as it is set around your time frame.
__________________
Michael Breen Aut Inveniam Viam Aut Faciam |
11-08-2014, 03:39 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The plutonium rich regions of Washington State
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
What happens to Canada and Mexico? Would parts of Arizona and New Mexico revert to Mexican rule?
Perhaps a combined Oregon, Washington, and western Idaho panhandle (along with possibly parts of Brittish Columbia, and if so southern Alaska) would unite to form a Pacific state; call it Cascadia or Columbia or something. An alternative would be one nation comprising the west Cascades and coastal regions while a separate nation claims the Columbia plateau. The Great Plains forms a wide expanse of territory without significant natural obstacles - Great Plains states would likely remain united (or quickly be re-integrated by some expansionist ruler). The Mississippi and Missouri Rivers would help to facilitate commerce and communication and tie this region together. Similarly, but on a much smaller scale, the Snake River Plain would likely remain a single political entity. Whether it is part of any other political entity is up for grabs. The Rocky Mountains may make travel difficult enough that much of that land could break up into feuding micro-states controlled by local warlords. Since Hoover Dam was never constructed, Nevada and Arizona are probably desert wastelands, useless for much in the way of agriculture and nearly impossible to support cities. Some stockmen might eke out a meager existence and the native peoples would continue to live as they always have, but these might be areas that no one really cares to claim. Luke |
11-08-2014, 05:18 PM | #4 | |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
The British Empire (and most other world powers) have also collapsed, or survived by turning their attention inward, so I suspect Canada has also fragmented to some degree. Successor states that straddle the former border might be likely. Mexico's revolution may have gone drastically different, but I'd need to read a bit more before I could come up with anything.
Quote:
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
|
11-08-2014, 07:28 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
Will Shetterly's and Vince Stone's Captain Confederacy has a map of the fragmented states of America in their ATU. The comic itself features some information of the rest of the world (British Empire defeated, Germany and Japan the two superpowers, Canada and Mexico both there but somewhat diminished, etc.).
Hans |
11-08-2014, 07:54 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
Quote:
Texas looks plausible, though at 4 or 5% of the population it's smallish. California looks to group fairly strongly with the other western states (Oregon and Washington at least, 5 or 6%). I think Deseret is pretty dead by 1920, I suppose Utah, Nevada, south Idaho and north Arizona is heavily Mormon, but at less than a million people between them kinda doubtfully viable. I guess it's about as populous as Albania and maybe has a similar more trouble to invade than it's worth vibe to it. Separating NYC from the rest of New York at this point looks iffy (Al Smith, a Tammany candidate for sure, won substantial chunks of the upstate vote in all his terms as governor). The New Confederacy at this point can't quite overlap the old South - it's not likely Kentucky, Tennessee or Arkansas, or for that matter western Virginia or North Carolina would go along with it. Still roughly 15% of the population Any of the states touching the Great Lakes will probably do for a People's Republic. Wisconsin-Minnesota-Dakota looks plausible too, that'd be about 6% of the population. Once you peel off the Pacific, the Confederacy and New York, getting several separate competing United States is harder than you might think. I guess an independent New York (about 10% of the population, add New Jersey and bump it to 13%) splits New England (about 8%) from the belt of lakeside states (Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois - 28%), I guess you can make those and the border states (Kentucky-Tennessee-West Virginia-Western Virginia-Western North Carolina - 7%) competing Unions.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
11-08-2014, 08:46 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
You should also keep in mind that state borders aren't necessarily all that meaningful when things really go off the rails. For example, I grew up in Memphis, which has a whole lot more in common with Mississippi and Arkansas than the rest of Tennessee (and stronger economic links, too). You might see western Tennessee and Kentucky appending themselves to whatever grouping controlled the lower Mississippi River, where eastern Tennessee has a lot more in common with eastern Kentucky, northern Georgia, and western Virginia and North Carolina.
There are lots of other possibilities, depending on how detailed you want to get. Maryland might well swallow Delaware, for example, and New England has a lot of very artificial boundaries. |
11-08-2014, 09:14 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Enchanted Land-O-Cheese
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
Milwaukee had a number of Socialist mayors during the first half of the 20th Century. They were sometimes derided by More Serious Thinkers as "Sewer Socialists" because they were more interested in improving the city's infastructure than in Marxist ideological purity.
You might also look into some of the Farmer's political organizations from the early 20th Century as possible nuclei for splinter states.
__________________
Read "Danger Cay" at Hannibal Tesla Adventure Magazine! Pulp Era Adventure and Two-Fisted Science in the futuristic world of 1935! |
11-08-2014, 10:41 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alsea, OR
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
Quote:
In that timeframe, it is far more likely to be absorbed by Canada if the US breaks up. |
|
11-09-2014, 04:59 AM | #10 | |
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
|
Re: Fragmented States of America circa 1930
Quote:
__________________
Podcast: Improvised Radio Theatre - With Dice Gaming stuff here: Tekeli-li! Blog; Webcomic Laager and Limehouse Buy things by me on Warehouse 23 |
|
|
|