01-04-2011, 12:49 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
Re: Age of Sail
Also, rowing a full-size galleon is pretty much an exercise in futility. Ships that did combine some of the aspects of galleons and galleys did exist (see galleas), but unmodified, a galleon is harder to row than almost any other ship you could name.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! |
01-04-2011, 01:55 PM | #22 |
Stick in the Mud
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rural Utah
|
Re: Age of Sail
Somewhere amongst my pile of game papers I have a few age of sail pirate type ships statted up.
So far I have a couple of types of Sloop (Bermuda and Jamaica), A general Cutter, A Brig, A Frigate, And I think, a Brigantine.
__________________
MIB #1457 |
01-04-2011, 02:12 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
|
Re: Age of Sail
The French did use criminal labour as rowers in their galleys but it was not for propulsion. It was to turn the ships quickly so their cannons could bear quicker. I'm not sure of the dates but I think this was for most of the 19th century.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer. ˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ |
01-04-2011, 03:41 PM | #24 |
Careful Wisher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oregon, WI
|
Re: Age of Sail
Please do share. There are interested parties on the line.... :)
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ P. Mandrekar, Geneticist and Gamer Rational Centrist "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts"- Daniel P. Moynihan |
01-04-2011, 05:40 PM | #25 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zagreb,Croatia
|
Re: Age of Sail
there were full rigged schooners also,I was talking about hull shape more than about rigging(though both are needed for clipper).
__________________
SJG Browser turn based strategy game Ultracorps Great community...give it a try :) |
01-04-2011, 05:56 PM | #26 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
|
Re: Age of Sail
Schooners where built for speed. As such they usually have fore-and-aft rigging. Clippers were built for hauling, the most cargo for the least crew (then as now, wages were the one cost easily controlled). As such, they were usually tall ships (masts on top of masts).
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer. ˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ |
01-04-2011, 05:57 PM | #27 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Central Florida
|
Re: Age of Sail
Yes, I double checked my data and you would be correct. I meant Galley, which were MORE obsolete than Galleon's (which the History of Pirates book indicates were terribly uncomfortable to sail in. But they did have the one redeeming quality of usually being loaded with hundreds of thousands of pieces of eight.)
__________________
(Censored) |
01-04-2011, 08:38 PM | #28 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Age of Sail
Quote:
It had a long streamlined hull and as much sail as you get manage without capsizing the ship (most of the time). A cargo hauler would have been much wider in the beam.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
01-04-2011, 09:35 PM | #29 |
Join Date: May 2007
|
Ships, late 19th cent:
Conway's "History of the Ship: The Advent of Steam" has some good entries on the mixed steam/sail era.
D. K. Brown, in his "From Warrior to Dreadnought", discusses the dramatic changes in warship technology over this time (1860-1906.) Some general observations: There were a fair number of clunky cargo vessels active in the 19th century not that much different in size, draft, or maneuverability from those 16th century galleons. Just remove the "castle" superstructures and you'll have an adequate approximation. Also -- look up the "West Indiaman" ship -- probably a bark or full-rigged ship -- with a relatively small crew -- that would have been a standard http://www.ageofsail.net/ has a variety of ships' information that could help you determine proper statistics. Note that it was not until the early 1870s that the fuel efficiency of steam engines improved to the point that it made sense to use such in merchantmen. These ships retained sails for good economic reason. If you used low efficiency steam engines you had to carry so much fuel to get anywhere you couldn't carry much cargo. Also, steam engineers were rare and hence highly-paid; so labor costs were cheaper with sail. This changed with the introduction of the triple-expansion reciprocating steam engine c. 1873-79. Also, more people had learned steam engineering so wages dropped somewhat. In the Caribbean, you'd have steam liners going from the big ports in Europe and the US to Havana, Maracaibo, Veracruz, and Kingston. You'd also have smaller sailing and perhaps auxiliary steam vessels going from these Caribbean ports to the smaller ones. Finally, you'd have small coastal schooners and sloops carrying people and small cargoes between the cays and small ports. So, depending on the sort of campaign you plan, you might want to have statistics obtained or devised for a large liner, a smaller sailing ship with an auxiliary steam engine, and a small sloop or schooner. The "Warrior to Dreadnought" book has some statistics on small naval patrol vessels. These are RN, but not too dissimilar to French, Dutch, Spanish, or others that would have patrolled the Caribbean. |
01-05-2011, 01:47 PM | #30 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Age of Sail
Quote:
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
|
|
|