07-05-2017, 04:21 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
Turnover/revolving black powder guns
I may have a new favourite gadget.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoNUgQZ-wf8 It’s a matchlock pistol with a hand-spun revolving horizontal drum. These and pepper-box-like turnover pistols seem like a down-to-earth form of repeating handgun to introduce into a TL4 setting – not quite the kind of upgrade that would massively change warfare, but provides a way for people to make more than one shot. What’s the catch? Obviously single-shot firearms did not vanish overnight. These gadgets seem to be quite unusual. Therefore, what kind of problems am I missing for this kind of firearm? Why were they not more popular? I am thinking these would be minor modifications to standard firearms, but what modifiers would be appropriate? First, Bulk is an obvious one. I think the Bulk should be at least 1 point worse, maybe 2. Would Accuracy suffer because of the extra weight? I can see familiarity penalties applying to someone not used to the heavier guns. Maybe make familiarity with these a Perk? Possibly slightly smaller barrels/chambers to fit them on the weapon, maybe reducing the wounding modifier from Pi+ to Pi? With the rotating drum, the break between the drum and the barrel might leak out some of the blast. Should that lower damage at all? Malfunction rating? More chance of a misfire or hang fire if the spark and the barrel are not perfectly aligned. Obviously rotating the barrels or drum would be at least a Ready action. Faster than reloading a muzzleloading black powder weapon normally, but it still leaves gaps between shots. So far I'm thinking Bulk & Malfunction both 1 point worse, Ready actions between shots, and maybe the type of piercing becomes one step smaller. What else have I missed? Why wouldn’t these come to dominate over single-shot firearms? I know cost is a factor, but I figure that once gunsmiths become familiar with the designs they wouldn't be that much more expensive to make. I want to avoid the circular situation of them being rare because of being expensive and being expensive because they are rare. Thanks in advance. |
|
|