07-27-2016, 12:21 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
The Romans left jewelry with octahedral diamonds (what we'd call a "point cut", I think). They were probably ground to shape rather than cut (cleaved, that is), and might have taken advantage of natural cleavage, but we don't really know for sure whether or not they intentionally cut their diamonds.
|
07-27-2016, 06:47 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Jul 2016
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Is it just me or has no one realized that Shape Earth's cost reads as:
Cost: 1 per cubic yard of earth shaped (minimum 2). Half that to maintain (round up). Meaning you would need at least 2 cubic yards of Diamonds to be able to effect the material? Taking levels in jeweler would likely be a better route. Plus as far as I know, Create Earth only makes earth or clay, not diamonds. |
07-27-2016, 07:12 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Minimum cost doesn't mean minimum amount of material that must be present. It just costs 2 to affect even one single little carat. Or two cubic yards of them, whichever you happen to have handy.
|
07-27-2016, 08:04 PM | #24 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Quote:
Shape Earth also specifies 6x cost for worked stone. So it's take 12 energy even if you have carats and not tons. You also need a Physics Skill of sufficient TL to model refraction. Even if you reject science you'd probably need to see clear glass to get even a basic idea. Clear glass takes you back to TL.:) Low TL lapidaries would probably use Shape earth on gemstones to make cameos or scarabs or similar carved stones.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
07-27-2016, 10:07 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2016, 02:08 AM | #26 | |
Join Date: May 2016
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2016, 05:39 AM | #27 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
It's certainly the natural crystal shape; even modern diamond cutting takes advantage of the natural cleavage lines. But natural diamonds rarely conveniently form octahedrons. So, the Roman jewelers likely had to put work into those stones one way or another to get them even as symmetrical as they are. We don't have solid evidence of diamond cutting in Europe before the 14th century, and not even much in the way of faceted gems, but that doesn't mean that's because of a technological limitation making it impossible without advanced metals (or magic).
|
07-28-2016, 10:34 PM | #28 | |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Magic: Harder than diamonds?
Quote:
The huge emeralds on the Dagger, for their part, are faceted, but the Dagger is relatively young, too. |
|
Tags |
diamond, hardened, penetrating weapon |
|
|