12-29-2013, 02:40 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Looking through Martial Arts, it looks like almost all the techniques do Thrust damage, even the ones that involve a swinging motion to attack, like Axe Kick. Why? Shouldn't it do Swing damage, because you're swinging your foot into them? Hell, for that matter, why don't advantages like Talons or Long Talons that let you choose between Slashing and Impaling damage with unarmed attacks let you do Swing damage on the Slashing? I mean, Long Talons are described as being like a sword coming out of your arm, and yet it won't let you do Swing damage like an actual sword would.
It doesn't make any sense. |
12-29-2013, 02:57 AM | #2 |
Dog of Lysdexics
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Swing Damage is reserved for weapons the provide leverage in 4e
now Claws do let you do slashing damage, that why they let you do (cut) rather than (cr), and talons do let you chose (imp) it's just based on thr. The maneuvers that let you pack more 'umph' into your unarmed attack do sy by allowing to doe more damage per die rather than changing you to type swing. |
12-29-2013, 02:58 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
I suspect it is because when you examine the muscle action, it is a thrust, just not one that is directly away from the body. Swing attacks make use of a weighted business end that is distant from where the muscle action is happening. That extra length acts as a lever to multiply the effective force.
|
12-29-2013, 03:45 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
I think that it's somewhat of a game design issue. Generally karate should do less damage than a sword. A cinematic martial artist has lethal strike and lethal kick. This allows them to do impaling damage which evens the odds a bit, especially when you include Power Blow.
__________________
A little learning is a dangerous thing. Warning: Invertebrate Punnster - Spinelessly Unable to Resist a Pun Dangerous Thoughts, my blog about GURPS and life. |
12-29-2013, 03:56 AM | #5 | ||
Dog of Lysdexics
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-08-2014, 04:47 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Bladed Hand from Martial Arts uses Brawling, Karate or DX and does Sw-2 cut.
Incidentally, a strict reading of the rules for the Karate skill reveal that you do not actually get a damage bonus for high skill when using bladed hands because the damage bonus only applies to thrust-based damage. You'd presumably need Weapon Master (Bladed Hand) for a damage bonus. |
01-08-2014, 05:34 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
It's already been said, but swing attacks require some kind of leverage above and beyond the limb in question (technically I guess 'Swing' damage is actually 'mechanically advantaged' damage).
Want to get Sw damage on a kick? Wear some stilts! Quote:
Last edited by Tomsdad; 01-08-2014 at 08:19 AM. |
|
01-08-2014, 06:28 AM | #8 | |
Dog of Lysdexics
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Quote:
Also remember this things extend 8-10 inches past the hand and are not the climbing claws. Last edited by roguebfl; 01-08-2014 at 08:09 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
01-08-2014, 07:59 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Personally, I'm suspicious of anything getting Swing damage at Reach C - when your target is within your personal reach, I don't think you can really benefit from a lever. Weapons that can currently get Swing Cutting damage at Reach C should probably have it reduced to Thrust Cutting, probably with the same damage modifier as the Thrust Impaling attack (a knife blade is comparable to a wide spear head, but even more so). Weapons that can do Swing Crushing at Reach C should probably have it reduced to Thrust Crushing, with the same damage modifier as the Swing version had (you're better off thrusting with a Short Baton at Reach C).
Of course, that's all just my opinion, and the damage totals probably end up being rather comparable anyway. |
01-08-2014, 08:18 AM | #10 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
|
Re: Why no Unarmed Swing damage?
Quote:
|
|
|
|