Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2013, 01:41 AM   #11
jeff_wilson
Computer Scientist
 
jeff_wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagan View Post
The entire Meta Magic college is your magical hacker toolkit. Why build a back door into spells when you can either cancel a spell you've cast by spending a fatigue point or using control or steal spell.
Because people can notice something is up when their spell goes away.
__________________
.
Reposed playtest leader.

The Campaigns of William Stoddard
jeff_wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 05:38 AM   #12
Peter V. Dell'Orto
Fightin' Round the World
 
Peter V. Dell'Orto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
But in a world where magic is real and there are professionals who will ward a place for a fee, I would think that some specialists would create a version with a back door. Think magical hackers.
So, allow people to either learn a new version of the spell or make it a technique.
__________________
Peter V. Dell'Orto
aka Toadkiller_Dog or TKD
My Author Page
My S&C Blog
My Dungeon Fantasy Game Blog
"You fall onto five death checks." - Andy Dokachev
Peter V. Dell'Orto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 09:41 AM   #13
DangerousThing
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter V. Dell'Orto View Post
So, allow people to either learn a new version of the spell or make it a technique.
I thought that was what I was saying by suggesting that some would create a version with a back door.

Now, I wonder if magic spells could be encrypted so that another mage wouldn't be able to detect what the spell does? I would think that to do this, you'd need to create an encryption spell to encode the first one. To be fair, the encrypted spell might have to be a technique so that spells you encrypt all the time would be easy to do, but spells you haven't done the prep-work on are not as secure and may break.

I figure that if society has had magic for a while, the practitioners would start to see the same sorts of problem that computer programmers do. Only computer programs don't fireball you if you don't put in the right passcode. :)
DangerousThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 09:58 AM   #14
Peter V. Dell'Orto
Fightin' Round the World
 
Peter V. Dell'Orto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
I thought that was what I was saying by suggesting that some would create a version with a back door.
So was I. My point was doing it on the fly would be hard. Making a special version ahead of time would be a different spell or a technique.
__________________
Peter V. Dell'Orto
aka Toadkiller_Dog or TKD
My Author Page
My S&C Blog
My Dungeon Fantasy Game Blog
"You fall onto five death checks." - Andy Dokachev
Peter V. Dell'Orto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:34 PM   #15
Pagan
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
I thought that was what I was saying by suggesting that some would create a version with a back door.

Now, I wonder if magic spells could be encrypted so that another mage wouldn't be able to detect what the spell does? I would think that to do this, you'd need to create an encryption spell to encode the first one. To be fair, the encrypted spell might have to be a technique so that spells you encrypt all the time would be easy to do, but spells you haven't done the prep-work on are not as secure and may break.

I figure that if society has had magic for a while, the practitioners would start to see the same sorts of problem that computer programmers do. Only computer programs don't fireball you if you don't put in the right passcode. :)
Also, spells aren't programs. You can treat them like this sure, but you are changing an Art into a Science. If that is what you are going for then I'd suggest a series of Perks (per spell) that allow you to use specialized techniques to customize the mechanical aspects of your spells such as a technique to make dispelling more difficult or easier (your backdoor).
__________________
"First Scarran you see, you tell him who his daddy is....tell him Dargo!"
Pagan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 09:09 PM   #16
DangerousThing
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagan View Post
Also, spells aren't programs. You can treat them like this sure, but you are changing an Art into a Science. If that is what you are going for then I'd suggest a series of Perks (per spell) that allow you to use specialized techniques to customize the mechanical aspects of your spells such as a technique to make dispelling more difficult or easier (your backdoor).
Maybe spells aren't programs in your worlds...

Though actually I was thinking of analogous techniques. As their magic advances, I see many of the same problems we have with computers happening with magic.

I figure that the GURPS Magic spells will be the first couple of magical TL spells and they would improve as society became more advanced.

The OP specifically said that the magical society had the scientific method. I figure that eventually mages would turn it on their own spells and figure out how they work.
DangerousThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 01:29 AM   #17
Pagan
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

You're making a couple of arrogant assumptions.

First, I challenge you to prove this from the OP:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
The OP specifically said that the magical society had the scientific method.
You're the one that put a modern spin on the OP post. You likened it to computers and hacking. You overlaid your vision of how magic would evolve on the OP situation. You took the word "backdoor" and decided it meant modern day or future, not, just an alternate way to manipulate a spell.

Secondly,
Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
I figure that eventually mages would turn it on their own spells and figure out how they work.
Why would you assume this? It's magic. They could understand how to use it for millennium and never figure out how or why it works. That may be how things work in YOUR worlds but it is by no means universal
__________________
"First Scarran you see, you tell him who his daddy is....tell him Dargo!"
Pagan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 12:59 PM   #18
Railstar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DangerousThing View Post
One thing I would suggest that you NOT do is to threaten or hurt the spellcaster. Or try to do him harm.

He's operating a security firm and he's better at it than you could be or else you could get through his spells. Were I him, I'd have defenses against personal attack on himself or his employees. I might also have some ways of checking to see if my mind has been interfered with and a way of recording which spells were used.
I just want to emphasise this. This so much.

This guy is definitely going to be more protected than the guy you need his help to reach.
Railstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 01:45 PM   #19
D10
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In Rio de Janeiro, where it was cyberpunk before it was cool.
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Cant you just ... do your thing when hes out of this myriad of protections ?
D10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 01:35 AM   #20
DangerousThing
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: Putting a "backdoor" in protective spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagan View Post
You're making a couple of arrogant assumptions.

First, I challenge you to prove this from the OP:



You're the one that put a modern spin on the OP post. You likened it to computers and hacking. You overlaid your vision of how magic would evolve on the OP situation. You took the word "backdoor" and decided it meant modern day or future, not, just an alternate way to manipulate a spell.

Secondly,


Why would you assume this? It's magic. They could understand how to use it for millennium and never figure out how or why it works. That may be how things work in YOUR worlds but it is by no means universal
First, I made a mistake because I'm following a couple of magic threads. The one I was thinking about was if a magical world (highly developed) was atttacked by a TL 9 world. My mistake, and sorry for the confusion.

Secondly, if you allow the researching of new spells, then magic has some laws, rules, or habits. The college of meta-magic tends to convince me of this.

And I stand by my statement that if a magical society develops, it will run into the same types of problems that our society has seen. I doubt that any society of humans would prove so stagnant that after using it for millennia it would still be so unknown.
DangerousThing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
magic


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.