04-25-2017, 11:33 AM | #21 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
I specifically mentioned stepping into a blow to increase its power. If you're not doing that (only using upper body strength), gravity doesn't much matter.
|
04-25-2017, 01:33 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Quote:
Very seriously any rapid forceful motion of the human body is a transaction in inertial mass rather than gravitational weight. An astronaut in microgravity does see his normal walking rate decline towards zero or possibly even become an irrational number but he simply stops trying to walk. His ability to move quickly is largely unimpaired. Do I really need to dig up a link to the Skylab astronaut doing acrobatics?
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
04-25-2017, 01:56 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Right, that's dependent on gravity; without gravity that pushing 'back' turns into hopping into the air, which isn't useful.
|
04-25-2017, 02:36 PM | #24 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Quote:
You're still doing the bio-mechanics wrong anyway. Any downward push is minor compared to a forward/back component which will push your soles across the ground horizontally. Really, rapid forceful motions of the human body are about inertial mass and people do not move in slow motion in reduced gravity.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
04-25-2017, 03:26 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Quote:
In general, sideways acceleration is capped at (acceleration of gravity) * horizontal offset of pushing contact point) / (vertical offset of center of gravity); if you try to go faster than that, you jump. At a certain point you start slipping, but this isn't normally a factor for legs. |
|
04-25-2017, 04:15 PM | #26 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Would that mean a super strong character punching a wall is going to go flying backwards under earth gravity?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
04-25-2017, 04:46 PM | #27 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Theoretically yes, though it would require an awful lot of super strength.
|
04-25-2017, 06:16 PM | #28 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
That's almost trivial - if you push on the wall, the wall pushes on you, and if you push hard enough at least one of you is going to move.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
04-25-2017, 06:22 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Quote:
EDIT: I mean, that's a short description of how animals with legs walk, run, and jump - doing it at a 90 degree angle doesn't make it privileged in physics.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
04-25-2017, 06:36 PM | #30 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Science] The Hard Science of Low Gravity versus High Gravity
Well, the issue is mostly how much force is required to overcome gravity. It actually depends on attack angle, if you uppercut the wall you aren't going anywhere because the reaction is pushing you into the ground.
|
|
|