10-05-2017, 05:28 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: Concentrate vs. Concentrate Maneuver
Yeah, I've gotten in the habit online of capitalizing words when being used as game terminology.
|
10-05-2017, 09:19 PM | #12 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK
|
Re: Concentrate vs. Concentrate Maneuver
Quote:
__________________
MiB 7704 Playing: GURPS Nordlond Dragons of Hosgarth Running Savage Worlds Tour of Darkness (Vietnam + Mythos) |
|
10-06-2017, 07:31 AM | #13 | |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
|
Re: Concentrate vs. Concentrate Maneuver
Quote:
EDIT: My above statement is wrong. Spells that require concentration to keep going do require full blown Concentrate Maneuvers each turn to fully utilize them. It's just that you can also cast a new spell while maintaining these spells, albeit at -3 penalty, if you want. You're still taking a single Concentrate Maneuver on your turn – you're just concentrating on more than a single spell. You can not, however, maintain a spell that requires concentration and swing a sword at something – that would be two different maneuvers: Concentration and Attack for example, and that is not allowed.
__________________
Last edited by Captain Joy; 10-10-2017 at 07:18 PM. Reason: Dropped extraneous sentence. Clarification. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|