06-08-2018, 06:34 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York City
|
[DF] [Magic] Enchantment & Spells
If I have armor with the enchantments Fortify+1 (+1DR) & Deflect+1 (+1DB) (Magic p.66-67) But I also have the spells Armor+1 (+1DR) & Shield+1 (+1DB) do they stack? (Magic p.167)
Thanks. |
06-11-2018, 11:34 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York City
|
Re: [DF] [Magic] Enchantment & Spells
I find it surprising that this hasn't come up in the past. If no one else knows, I guess I'll have to go with the DFRPG answer.
|
06-11-2018, 11:54 AM | #4 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
|
Re: [DF] [Magic] Enchantment & Spells
Quote:
Though, I have to say, the amount of DB available from spells, especially when you combo Shield and Deflect, worries me. While I think it's within the RAW to stack them, I'd suggest going with the DFRPG option here, or to cap the maximum DB you can get from any source. I'd suggest capping that at +5, personally, which is already 2 higher than you can get from any mundane shield. |
|
06-11-2018, 02:31 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: [DF] [Magic] Enchantment & Spells
Quote:
|
|
06-11-2018, 08:01 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: [DF] [Magic] Enchantment & Spells
Quote:
"DR from this spell is treated for all purposes like DR from armor, and is cumulative with that from actual armor." The answer is "Yes, they do stack". Note that the one is an enchantment, the other is a spell, and casting a spell onto an enchanted item is one thing, but casting a spell upon a person who happens to be wearing armor (be it enchanted or not) is the operative phrase here. So, yes, you can combine them. Now, anytime you run into a situation that doesn't make sense, you can always go looking to see how GURPS CLASSIC MAGIC handles the same issue. As it turns out, the two versions (4e and Classic 3e are largely the same). The only other reference I can find in GURPS CLASSIC MAGIC that "MAY" in your eyes reflect on the question you posed is on page 11 under "Limits on Protection". Problem is? As I read it, it seems to only refer to what happens if you have someone cast say, Armor 2 on a character, and someone else casts armor 3 on the same person, those two don't stack, but that the higher level of the casting of that protective spell is operative. But that's my read on it, and I wouldn't bother to double the energy cost or anything like that (although, as a house rule, I wouldn't argue against the GM for implementing it simply because what works for the goose, works for the gander so to speak.) In the end, the reason I wouldn't worry about it much? The player character paid good gold to get his enchanted item. Casting a 5 point Armor spell on behalf of someone costs the mage roughly 10 fatigue (for skill level 14 or less) or 9 fatigue for a skill 15 or less. To top it off, it then costs a total of half that to maintain per minute. Player characters will RARELY have sufficient energy at hand to be able to pull that off for any real long duration. That's entirely up to you however. I realize that you're asking for the collective wisdom, but in the end, if you're the GM, talk it over with your players. Look at how much magical energy your player characters generally have on hand at any give time and ask yourself "is this really going to be a problem?" Sometimes, the best thing to do is discuss it with your players and see how they suggest handling it. ;) |
|
|
|