08-24-2013, 06:29 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Okay, some simplified math:
To stay up with a rocket, you need a vertical force equal to gravity (actually, gravity * (1-(V/Vorbit))^2, but at launch that's gravity). The rest of your force is applied as a horizontal effect. However, these are perpendicular forces, and we're dealing with vector addition, so the total thrust is the hypotenuse of a right triangle, and your horizontal acceleration is sqrt( A^2 - G^2 ), which means a 2g ship has 1.73g horizontal acceleration (86.6% efficiency), a 3g ship has 2.83g horizontal (94.3% efficiency). Including the reduction in lift requirements for higher velocity, extra delta-V requirements for orbit are about 18% for 150% of local gravity, 8% for 200% of local gravity, and 4% for 300% of local gravity. In addition to this, you need to deal with the atmosphere, which is usually handled by going straight up and is more complicated to solve; usual paths just get out of atmosphere as fast as practical. With wings, on the other hand, you have to stay in atmosphere, but you can use the wings to generate lift, instead of using your rockets. Doing this produces drag, with two parts, one which gets larger as velocity increases, one which gets smaller. This means you have an ideal velocity at which drag is minimized; this velocity is inversely proportional to the square root of atmospheric density, with considerable modifications for mach number. An airplane's lift/drag ratio is the ratio of its weight to its drag. Subsonic aircraft can achieve L/D ratios of better than 20, supersonic aircraft usually are less than 10, and hypersonic airframes are often less than 5 (e.g. 4.5 for the space shuttle at subsonic speeds, 1 for the space shuttle at hypersonic speeds). While drag is much smaller than gravity in most cases, it's also horizontal rather than vertical and thus subtracts directly from acceleration; for a hypersonic airframe with a best L/D ratio of 5, a 1G ship needs 25% extra delta-V, a 0.5G ship needs 67% extra delta-V, and a 0.2G ship can't reach orbit at all. Last edited by Anthony; 08-25-2013 at 12:50 AM. Reason: remove dangling sentence |
08-24-2013, 07:06 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles County
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
|
08-30-2013, 08:27 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the UFO
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
If you write out a simple formula that I can use with any kind of aerospace designs, I'll put it in VEHICLE DESIGN spaceship rules and stick it into SPACESHIPS next time I have a chance to modify the rules.
For Vehicle Design, the aircraft's weight, drag area (which would be the same as coefficient of drag x wing area in a real vehicle) and its lift area (= wing plus lifting body area) are known. If you suggest how L/D could be derived from that and plugged into an equation, feel free. If it's too complex to derive numbers from gamable data, then I'll have to stick with the simplifications. The "0 for wings" is indeed a simplification; I got it from the original GURPS Space books, and just ported over. I don't remember Anthony or anyone else suggesting an alternative simplification during the SPACESHIPS playtest, but there were a lot of posts so it may have slipped trough the cracks.
__________________
Is love like the bittersweet taste of marmalade on burnt toast? |
08-30-2013, 09:06 PM | #24 | |||
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles County
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
Quote:
For aerospace designs you might need two axises (thrust/local gravity and L/D) but if you simplify by assuming near optimal L/D then you could fold the two tables together (with a note indicating that spacecraft below a certain thrust need wings). Quote:
|
|||
08-30-2013, 10:49 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
In practice, it's easiest to just use lookup or an average value (0.2 or more for anything actually capable of atmospheric hypersonic flight, as little as 0.02 for some gliders), though it's not too hard to accumulate constants to make those drag functions look easier (it turns out that you don't even need to know wing area -- aspect ratio is defined as wingspan^2 / wing area, so wing area * aspect ratio = wingspan^2). Last edited by Anthony; 08-30-2013 at 10:53 PM. |
|
08-31-2013, 12:04 AM | #26 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the UFO
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
"If acceleration is less than about 4x local G (g on the table below), multiply delta-V required to reach orbit as follows: Accel No Wings 0.2 x g ... no lift off! 0.5 x g ... no lift off! 1.0 x g ... ??? 1.5 x g ... x1.18 delta V 2.0 x g ... x1.08 delta V 3.0 x g ... x1.04 delta V 4.0 x g ... x1 delta V Accel. ... With Wings 0.2 x g ... no lift off 0.5 x g ... x1.67 delta V 1.0 x g ... x1.25 delta V 1.5 x g ...??? 2.0 x g ... ??? 3.0 x g ... ??? 4.0 x g ... x1 (it falls between use the higher/lower/nearest/goldfish> example: Local gravity is 1 G. Acceleration is 1.5G. Delta-V required to lift off is therefore multiplied by x1.18 if you have no wings or by an amount I'm not yet sure of if you have wings. Though as I couldn't parse the formula, I'm not sure how that was derived.
__________________
Is love like the bittersweet taste of marmalade on burnt toast? Last edited by David L Pulver; 08-31-2013 at 12:13 AM. |
|
08-31-2013, 12:24 AM | #27 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the UFO
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
__________________
Is love like the bittersweet taste of marmalade on burnt toast? |
|
08-31-2013, 12:40 AM | #28 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles County
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2013, 12:43 AM | #29 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
How do you even know the stall speed? I once asked how to calculate stall speed for Spaceships, and IIRC the answer was fuzzy. (VE2e was another matter.)
|
08-31-2013, 01:06 AM | #30 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: EuroSpace E950 Minerva Executive Transatmospheric Vehicle
Quote:
Di = L^2/(0.5*rho*V^2*S*pi*e*AR) Di = L^2/(0.5*rho*V^2*wingspan^2*pi*e) Dp = 0.5*rho*V^2*Cd*A. Setting Dp = Di and solving for V: V^4 = L^2/(0.25*rho^2*wingspan^2*pi*e*Cd*A) V^2 = L/(0.5*rho*wingspan*sqrt(pi*e*Cd*A)) Dp = 0.5 * rho * L * Cd * A/ (0.5 * rho * wingspan * sqrt( pi*e*Cd*A ) ) Canceling out duplicate terms, we get: Dp = L * sqrt(Cd*A/(pi*e)) / Wingspan. Di = Dp, so drag = 2 * L * sqrt(Cd*A/(pi*e)) / Wingspan. Rearranging: L/D = 0.5 * Wingspan * sqrt( (pi*e) / (Cd*A) ) Since Cd*A for any given design tends to scale as Ws^2 * Form Factor, that works out to L/D = 0.5 * sqrt( (pi*e) / Form Factor ), meaning you can just list standard values based on airframe type (with adjustments for mach number). Note that it would be fairly simple to produce a table of expected values for spacecraft; it would take some research on supersonic drag coefficients, but then you just come up with a table, and note that air density can be treated as adjusting SM: a SM +6 craft at 1/10 atmospheric density flies just like a SM +12 craft at normal atmospheric density. Last edited by Anthony; 08-31-2013 at 01:35 AM. |
|
Tags |
spaceships, spaceships 7, ths, ths spaceship, transhuman space |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|