11-29-2008, 01:53 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
|
Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
On Powers, p.91, it is suggested that Persistent be used to allow Control to last past the time you stop concentrating. However, this seems clearly less good than Independent. Independent gives you your margin of success in minutes of duration, and it would seem be explicitly applicable - it says it's for "advantages that require concentration to control" (Powers, p. 108). But both are +40% enhancements. Is there some major benefit that Persistent gives that Independent doesn't that I'm not seeing? Or is the mention of Persistent just an errata in the Control writeup?
|
11-29-2008, 05:37 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
I believe the difference is that Independent means that the ability is independent from the moment of the activation roll on, whereas Persistent only takes over after concentration ceases. Independent gives more time, but at the price of losing the ability to use Control for a long time while concentrating first.
|
11-29-2008, 09:12 AM | #3 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
|
|
11-29-2008, 01:16 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dobbstown Sane Asylum
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
Pomphis has it right. The advantage to Persistent is that it is additive -- if you concentrate for an hour, then you get an hour, and you get the Persistent time on top of that, once you stop concentrating. With Independent, you can't get that hour. No matter how long you're willing to concentrate for, you get minutes equal to MoS. That's it. No more, no less.
__________________
Reverend Pee Kitty of the Order Malkavian-Dobbsian (Twitter) (LJ) MyGURPS: My house rules and GURPS resources.
#SJGamesLive: I answered questions about GURPS After the End and more! {Watch Video} - {Read Transcript} |
|
11-29-2008, 02:56 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
|
|
11-29-2008, 03:46 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
The problem is when people try to read an "undefined" duration as "1 second".
"Undefined" is potentially "Forever, or until I have to go take a a potty break or something." That's a long duration, not a short one.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
11-29-2008, 06:42 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Just to be clear, I don't have a problem with that ruling. It's just that it's not obvious to me that that is what was meant in the text, suggesting a possible errata.
|
11-30-2008, 01:05 AM | #8 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
|
|
11-30-2008, 01:12 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
|
|
11-30-2008, 01:12 AM | #10 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dobbstown Sane Asylum
|
Re: Independent Vs. Persistent on Control
Quote:
Control + Persistent has a duration that is indefinite. It could be days if you have enough caffeine in you. This is balanced by the fact that you have to sit there and concentrate. Control + Independent is a flat (well, more flat than the above, hopefully you know what I mean) duration of a few minutes. This is balanced by the fact that you can walk away.
__________________
Reverend Pee Kitty of the Order Malkavian-Dobbsian (Twitter) (LJ) MyGURPS: My house rules and GURPS resources.
#SJGamesLive: I answered questions about GURPS After the End and more! {Watch Video} - {Read Transcript} |
|
Tags |
independent, persistent |
|
|