|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-23-2014, 08:04 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
I agree. I actually prefer games were PCs explicitly aren't immune to social influence or take some penalty from blatantly ignoring successful social actions directed against them. Otherwise it can become largely pointless to even give NPCs social abilities. I've had way too many bad experiences with what you're describing over the years. To be fair though some of it was caused by GMs abusing the social conflicts rules in their games but some was just asinine behavior. Though I do think justifications can matter in play for those fiddly situations that can come up but are too situational to bother statting out.
Last edited by Keiko; 12-23-2014 at 08:09 AM. |
12-23-2014, 08:05 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Okay... you're weird. :D
But Seriously, I think a strong dislike of perfumes is more a Quirk for an individual character than an overall problem. Most people like perfumes, colognes, etc just not people that drench themselves in them or try to use them as a substitute for bathing. The latter would be OPHs. Last edited by Keiko; 12-23-2014 at 08:08 AM. |
Tags |
sanitized metabolism, social engineering |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|