08-16-2013, 05:52 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
This is the first in a short series of threads discussing some rather large house rules I've been considering. As the title implies, this addresses combat skills. It modifies the way GURPS deals with what combat skills are, how the various skills are interrelated (that is, defaults), and also makes some modifications to the way defenses work. This initial posting is divided into several posts. This first is the introduction to the concepts. Next up is the list of combat skills and options to modify them. Finally is a new treatment for defenses, as well as some special situations. The third post covers some special situations. All that said, let's get into it...
We start with the introduction and justification. First off, I feel GURPS has too many combat skills, and the defaults between them are far too harsh. I don't honestly see a substantial difference between a shortsword and a broadsword - certainly no more difference than between a hatchet and a large (but still one-handed) axe. Additionally, some skills are largely redundant (looking at you, Sabre and Lance), while others are simply enhancements (Knife->Main-Gauche). There are also some strange effects, like being unable to thrust using Staff if the end of the weapon is pointy. There also exists the fact that being skilled in any form of melee combat should give an advantage over those who are less skilled, even if you aren't using the particular weapons you've trained with. Finally, I'd like to address some damage-related realism issues, namely that weapons never sustain so much as a nick unless they are a) specifically targeted or b) outright break when parrying heavy weapons. I also offer up some new options that should make hand/arm wounds closer to as common as in historical warfare. EDIT: This system is now out-dated, please see the new version here. Last edited by Varyon; 06-23-2014 at 10:14 AM. |
08-16-2013, 05:52 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
To start, we'll look at the new list of base skills, with the base defaults listed:
Unstated above is that all skills default to each other at -6, with an additional penalty if defaulting from an easier skill (so defaulting off Brawling - DX/E - for Flail - DX/H - is at -8, while going the other way is at -6). Additionally, at the GM's option, weapons with multiple skills for their use (such as a Greatsword using 2H Sword normally, Sword for one-handed use, Brawling for pomelling, and 2H Axe/Mace when swinging by gripping the blade) have more generous defaults when defaulting from the weapon's primary skill (in the above example, 2H Sword should be the primary, with one-handed use defaulting at -1 and the other listed uses defaulting at -2). Also unstated above is that, for armed skills, damage values from weapon tables assume at least [4] points in the skill (or defaulting to a comparable level from another skill). If a character has invested fewer points in it, attacks suffer -1/die to damage. Skills can be further modified, which changes their difficulty. Note this can change difficulty beyond the limits from the Basic Set - just keep in mind that every +/-1 to difficulty is -/+1 to skill for a given CP investment. Following are some modifications available:
The above are meant to be able to recreate most of the skills from the Basic Set, although some are at a different difficulty level (notably, most of the sword fencing skills are now DX/H, although you could make a point of removing the option to swing via Restricted, and change "Reduced Techniques" to "Reduced Weapon Selection" to bring them back down to DX/A). Below are some worked examples of possible variants, including many of those missing from above:
Even with the above, a few skills are no longer represented. These are Jitte/Sai, Force Sword, Lance, and Tonfa. Jitte/Sai, Lance, and Tonfa are easy enough - Jitte is really just Prongs (LTC2 p15) applied to another weapon, Lance is at best a Spear Technique, and Tonfa can be safely split into Brawling and Sword. Force Sword can be treated a few ways. One is to make each version (Knife, Sword, Glaive) an Exotic Weapon, imposing -2 to use until a character buys this off with a Perk. Another would be to treat the use of a Force Sword as a Technique, again at -2. Call it "Massless Weapon" or something. A final way would be to make an additional set of skills. Knife and Polearm versions would default to Knife-1 and Polearm-1, respectively (the weight of a knife isn't as important as that of a sword, and a Force Glaive is going to have comparable - albeit lighter and more balanced - weight to a physical polearm). Force Sword would default to Sword -2 or 2H Sword -2, depending on how it's being used. |
08-16-2013, 05:53 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
Our final modification is dealing with how Blocks/Parries work. We'll start simple - Blocks behave just as they always have, as does the shield's DB. However, shields now do have the option to Parry, but doing so halves (round down) the DB offered to other defenses (you must decide if you will use the Shield to Block or Parry upon the first time you make an Active Defense, regardless of what it is). The benefit of Parrying with a shield (in addition to the small boost to defense when making multiple such defenses) comes later.
Getting complicated, we deal with exactly what a Parry means. A fully successful Parry (MoS 3+) results in the attacking weapon being swept out of line with minimal contact. A Parry in which the base +3 makes a difference (MoS 0-2) results in the attacking weapon glancing off the weapon. A Parry that just barely fails (MoF 1) results in the weapon being struck full-on. For glances, typically only swung weapons have any effect - the parrying weapon takes 1/2 damage from the attack. A thrusting weapon simply doesn't have the points of contact necessary to cause any real damage. If the weapon is struck full-on, it takes damage normally, as though it were targeted. In either case, if Parrying unarmed, the character's limb is the "parrying weapon." To further complicate things, there are some special situations to keep in mind. A character can opt for minimum contact between the attacking weapon and his own. This results in -2 to Parry, but a glance only occurs with MoF 1 and full-on contact will not occur. This can be useful when parrying bare-handed! Contrariwise, a character can opt to "shield" himself with his weapon, gaining +1 to Parry. MoS 2+ is a glance (minimum contact is not an option), while anything down to MoF 1 is full-on contact. A final option available to characters is to Parry with no contact. This is essentially a Dodge, but it improves as the character gets better at fighting. No Contact Parry is based on the character's highest Parry (not accounting for weapon modifiers to Parry), but lacks the normal +3. Additionally, MoS 0 results in the character being struck with a glancing (1/2 damage) blow. In all other ways (penalty for multiple parries, and in terms of what can be parried) it functions as a normal Parry, with one change - any Parry results in it taking multiple Parry penalties, and it inflicts the same (so if using two swords, you could Parry normally with your right hand, then take an additional -4 with a No Contact Parry, then for your next Parry you can use your right hand or No Contact at -8 or left hand at -4). Optionally, No Contact Parry can also function (in terms of cumulative penalties) as a Dodge. Thanks to the effects of No Contact Parry, as well as the above improved defaults, Enhanced Parry is only available as affecting all Parries at [10]/level. Coming back to shields, Blocks result in a glance with MoS of (DB+3) and higher, and are full-on contact otherwise (down to MoS 0, after which point the character is hit). If Parrying with a shield, use the above rules for Parrying to determine degree of contact, with the modification that all thresholds have DB added to them. As an example, let's look at a +2 DB shield. Block: MoS 5+ is glance, MoS 0-4 is full-on contact, MoF 1+ means character is hit Normal Parry: MoS 5+ is minimal contact, MoS 2-4 is glance, MoS 0-1 and MoF 1 is full-on contact, MoF 2+ is a hit Minimal Contact Parry: -2 defense; MoS 2+ is minimal contact, MoS 0-1 and MoF 1 is glance, MoF 2+ is a hit Shielding Parry: +1 Parry; MoS 4+ is a glance, MoS 0-3 and MoF 1 is full-on contact. EDIT: I should note here that the bonus from using a Staff Grip functions just like a Parrying shield's DB. Fortunately, as I used a DB+2 shield in my example, you can just reuse those numbers for any Spear weapon wielded with a Staff Grip. DB: Unless Parrying with the shield, DB has a special interaction with the above weapon rules. The simplest way to apply it is to ignore DB when determining MoS/MoF. If the attack results in a hit, then compare MoF to DB - if MoF is less than or equal to DB, the shield is struck full-on; otherwise, the character is hit. Note this effectively results in a -1 to DB (as your weapon is effectively granting a +1, and these don't overlap), at least in most cases. Parrying Heavy Weapons: If a weapon glances, it counts as having 2/3rds its normal weight for purposes of breakage. A full-on hit uses the weapon's full weight. However, a heavy weapon has a very good chance of simply pushing a lighter one out of its way. If the attacking weapon weighs 2x (or more) as much as the parrying weapon (after adjusting for glancing, if appropriate), a Quick Contest of ST is undertaken between the two characters. The defender gets an automatic +4 to this Quick Contest, and it is further modified as follows: Fencing (defender): -2 to defender Swing (attacker): +2 to attacker Two hands on the weapon (either): +2; note this can apply to either character Block (defender): +2; opting for a Shielding Parry also qualifies here Ties go to the defender. If the defender wins, the Parry is successful, his weapon takes damage normally, and breakage is checked for (if appropriate). If the attacker wins, the defender's weapon takes damage normally and the attacker chooses between scoring a glance on the defender or knocking the defender's weapon out-of-line (requires a Ready to recover). If the attacker wins by 5+, his choice is between scoring a glance and knocking the defender's weapon out-of-line (optionally by driving the defender's weapon into him - treat as a glance from the attacker's weapon, but using the defender's damage type), or scoring a normal hit. If the attacker wins by 10+, he scores a normal hit and also knocks the defender's weapon out-of-line by driving it into him scoring an additional glance for free! Finally, we come to some optional rules to increase the chances of the hands/arms being struck in a failed Parry. If a Parry only just fails to result in the weapon being struck (typically, MoF 2), roll 1d. On a 1 or 2, the defending arm is hit (if defending with both arms, roll randomly). Optionally, you may make another 1d roll to determine if the hand is hit (on a 1). That's it to this rule... well, almost. There's one more thing to look at: Weapon Hilts: Hilts have no direct effect on a weapon's Parry score. However, on any full-contact Parry, roll 1d. On a 1 or 2, resolve the attack as a glance on both the parrying weapon and the parrying character's hand. A typical hilt grants DR 4 to the parrying character's hand (undersized or wooden hilts grant DR 2-3, basket hilts grant DR 6). Optionally, if the above roll was a 1, the damage is applied to the character's fingers! EDIT: A Staff Grip requires freedom of hand movement for its full effect. If a spear or polearm has a hilt added, it protects the fingers as normal but reduces the bonus for using a Staff Grip by 1. Note this makes Staff Grip useless for hilted polearms! .... And that's the end of it! Still here? Good! Feel free to voice comments and concerns. I'm curious what my fellow forumites think of all this (other than the likely "Wow, that was really unnecessary"). Last edited by Varyon; 08-16-2013 at 09:55 PM. |
08-16-2013, 09:17 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
I appreciate the desire to collapse the combat skills into fewer skills with clear distinctions but adding the modifiers seems to defeat the gains, you have more skills on the list than you started with. The results are sometimes unclear and it opens you up to Munchkinism like:
Master of Defense (Spear; Fencing, Restricted (Limited Weapons), Weak) DX/E I feel like it would be more balanced to just define things in a clearer way than Basic Set, rigorously enforce familiarity penalties, and not worry about building your own skills. |
08-16-2013, 09:35 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
Quote:
One bit of nitpicking - Limited Weapons isn't a legitimate option for Restricted, rather it's allowed (as per Rapier) to exchange the Limited Techniques requirement for Limited Weapons. You still need an actual restriction, although I think with what you're getting at Restricted (Staff-Grip Only, Limited Weapons instead of Limited Techniques) would work. I'll need to think on just how munchkin-like Master of Defense is. On one hand, a character with a high level of it is nearly untouchable when armed with a staff (or spear, whatever the limited weapon selection is). On the other hand, he needs to remain relatively unarmored and unencumbered, needs plenty of room to maneuver around, and has anemic damage (-1/die, in addition to -1 to thr). Take away his weapon, and any defaults he can work off of have similarly anemic damage. And taking away his weapon is fairly probable, thanks to all the glances (and head-on impacts) his weapon is going to be suffering from. Maybe if he used a metal staff... EDIT: Your post reminded me of something I forgot to mention in the initial write-up - the bonus to Parry from using a Staff Grip functions just like a Parrying shield's DB - meaning that +2 results in an increased chance of the weapon being hit. I'll modify the original post shortly... EDIT2: And... changed. You may notice I've also made a slight modification to this post - upon revisiting Staff Grip, I remembered that the -2 to sw only applied to polearms. Oops. Last edited by Varyon; 08-16-2013 at 09:57 PM. |
|
08-17-2013, 09:33 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
I have a different approach on parry and weapons breaking. I've thrown away weight, it doesn't matter. Why? simply because if you have a large knife and a guy with ST20 and a hatchet attack you, no chance of breaking, if an ST10 guy attacks you with a broadsword, then it has a good chance of breaking.
The rule is simple: Every weapon has only DR, no HP. If they parry by 0-2, they get full damage, if it passed DR, roll HT, failed? the weapon breaks. If they parry by 3+, half damage(this means almost never except for huge damage weapons, and most people won't even roll). Shields work the same way, but if they break, they only lose 1 DB each time. All this is on my revised muscle-based weapons system. On my signature. PS - I Strongly suggest increasing DR if you keep using the standard damage system. PS 2 - If you use my system, remember that pi/imp weapons only use half the actual damage for breaking purposes.
__________________
I've revised the Low Tech weapons table: http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=112532 |
08-17-2013, 12:24 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
Seems appealing on first glance.
I'd tweak some names to fit the generic building-block style of most of them. Brawling -> Striking; Fencing -> Footwork. Do you really need Weak? The only example is Judo. And Judo isn't unconcerned with efficiency. The moves are designed to be efficient enough; Wikipedia cites "seiryoku zen'yō" ("maximum efficiency; minimum effort") as a founding principle. It's just not focused on striking. This might simply be dumped into "Special" to characterize Judo. Or just leave it as stylists generally not putting many points into their Striking-based skill ("atemi-waza") as they do the Grappling-based one. I'm not expert, but I don't think Savate is pure kickboxing, and doesn't rate the Restricted designation. I'm tempted to look at "2H" as a modifier, but it would be a notional one like "Restricted" meaning you know 1H exclusive-or 2H weapons. So it's not really different from having it in the name of the skill, other than shortening the skill list. |
08-17-2013, 01:40 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Fine Line Between Black and White
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
Quote:
I really need that article with Set-up Attacks in it.. For weapon breakage, I do it the long way. Using the x3 weight rule only to decide when 'every' strike will damage a weapon with one added rule: An attack that is parried by 0 strikes the parrying weapon no matter the differences in weight. Treat the weapons like characters. Armoury is now First Aid for objects, and the objects actual damage isn't known until after that "First Aid" assessment, unless it broke during battle. Smart warriors' weapons break less often. Failed HT rolls on "Major Wounds" break the weapon in a way that it is still usable (perhaps with a different skill), a failed "Death Check" disables the weapon entirely. Modify weapon HT as follows: Wall Hanger: -2 Cheap: -1 Good: +0 Fine: +1 Very Fine: +2 Super Fine: +3 Hyper Dense: +4 We have weapon stats in Low-Tech now, there's no reason we shouldn't use them.
__________________
. ( )( ) -This is The Overlord Bunny o(O.o)o -Master of Bunnies O('')('') -And Destroyer of the Hasenpfeffer "This is the sort of relatively small error that destroys planetary probes." ~Bruno Last edited by Blood Legend; 08-17-2013 at 02:45 PM. |
|
08-17-2013, 02:07 PM | #9 |
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
I really agree.
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
08-17-2013, 02:15 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Re: GURPS Overhaul - Combat Skills
I'd agree as long as the perk was specific to a particular weapon. The various weapon skills that have one- and two-handed versions cover a large cross-section of weapons. For instance, Broadsword skill covers many kinds of swords. I think it's reasonable that a perk (or maybe better, you buy it up as a technique) can take care of the two-handed variety,for a specific kind of weapon. But just a perk (or even a technique) to get Two-Handed Sword skill up just from Broadsword skill doesn't seem right. Unless what I said is what you meant.
__________________
-JC |
Tags |
house rules, overhaul |
|
|