09-11-2019, 08:27 PM | #11 |
Munchkin Line Editor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Some posts in this thread fail to distinguish between errata (i.e., mistakes) and "things I, personally, would have done differently." If you find actual mistakes, please post them here. If you disagree with how Steve has designed something, feel free to write a house rule for it, but that's not errata. Please keep the distinction in mind.
__________________
Andrew Hackard, Munchkin Line Editor If you have a question that isn't getting answered, we have a thread for that. Let people like what they like. Don't be a gamer hater. #PlayMunchkin on social media: Twitter || Facebook || Instagram || YouTube Follow us on Kickstarter: Steve Jackson Games and Warehouse 23 |
09-11-2019, 08:56 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Clarity of the designer's intent should also qualify, I think.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos |
09-12-2019, 05:33 PM | #13 |
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Staff to Snake states that 'killing' the snake will cancel the spell and break the staff, but would Staff II (or higher) be effected by this consequence since it is not a result of the Break Weapon spell.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos |
09-12-2019, 06:17 PM | #14 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Yes, the staff would be broken by killing the snake, because you are not killin git with the Break Weapon spell and thus that immunity is irrelevant.
|
09-12-2019, 06:46 PM | #15 |
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: North Texas
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
I can follow the logic, but did Mr. Jackson intend to create this odd vulnerability? To my earlier point, understanding the designer's actual intent for these kinds of rule interactions is a valid function for errata and this thread.
__________________
“No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.” -Vladimir Taltos Last edited by TippetsTX; 09-12-2019 at 07:31 PM. |
09-13-2019, 09:04 AM | #16 |
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
as 3 or 4 or Skarg queries indicate, the Dodge and Defend rules need serious clarification as to the writer's intent (So must get into errata). We've put our matches on hold rather than house rule this since we'd like to know what Steve intended. (I'm sure Retreats would have also become a thing so I'm waiting on that too)
Please have a claiifying paragraph in the errata on Dodge and Defend points brought up by Skarg (thanks) |
09-13-2019, 05:03 PM | #17 | |
Join Date: Jun 2019
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Quote:
This was in Advanced Melee, immediately following the list of options, and also appeared in the first edition of Wizard. Was it left out of the Legacy edition on purpose, or by accident? If by accident, then putting it back in the new Errata might be appropriate. This is the "missing" text: CHANGING OPTIONS
__________________
"I'm not arguing. I'm just explaining why I'm right." |
|
09-14-2019, 10:02 AM | #18 | |
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: London Uk, but originally from Scotland
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Quote:
Last edited by Chris Rice; 09-14-2019 at 10:06 AM. |
|
09-14-2019, 05:18 PM | #19 |
Join Date: Mar 2018
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Weapons table p 110
Main gauche DX mod is +1, surely meant to be -1, like large shield |
09-14-2019, 06:25 PM | #20 | |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: TFT Errata for Hexagram #3
Quote:
|
|
|
|