08-07-2020, 08:46 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
The crew in the gondola might not think that. The engines will catch fire and die when sprayed with machinegun fire just liek the engines of any other air vehicle. The engines have fuel tanks too.
There's a lot more to Zeppelins than just balloonets and skin.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
08-07-2020, 08:58 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2020, 09:05 PM | #23 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
The point is that they are Hit Locations Zeppelins possess and they are not Diffuse so any claim that Zeppelins are Diffuse is mistaken. There are alot of ways to destroy Zeppelins with WWI fighters. It's just that a single burst to the main structure probably won't do it.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
08-07-2020, 09:18 PM | #24 | |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
__________________
Warning, I have the Distractible and Imaginative quirks in real life. "The more corrupt a government, the more it legislates." -- Tacitus Five Earths, All in a Row. Updated 12/17/2022: Apocrypha: Bridges out of Time, Part I has been posted. |
|
08-07-2020, 10:04 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2020, 11:32 PM | #26 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
Which is much more feasible for them than for air vehicles with fewer engines, more dependency on thrust to stay airborn, or less ability to access the engines in flight... Quote:
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
08-08-2020, 12:18 AM | #27 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
That's not what it takes. Zeppelins are huge, so aiming for specific locations isn't to hard - in daylight (the gondolas, etc. ate about as big as a fighter of the period and are far less able to manoeuvre). However, most of the attempts to shoot down Zeppelins occurred at night (because it was rapidly obvious to everyone that airships don't survive encounters with fighters in daylight), and even finding the Zeppelins was hard, and aiming for more than (that patch of blocked out ground/sky) wasn't really on the cards.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
08-08-2020, 11:50 AM | #28 | |
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
__________________
Help make a digital reference for GURPS by coming to the GURPS wiki and provide some information and links (such as to various Fanmade 4e Bestiaries) . Please, provide more then just a title and a page number. |
|
08-08-2020, 01:05 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
While there seems to be evidence that the Hindenburg incendiary paint hypothesis doesn't hold up, that doesn't mean that fire isn't dangerous to non-hydrogen-filled aircraft, lighter-than-air or otherwise. It would be bound to make them significantly less threatening. But not useless. If you've got lifting magic that is compact enough to allow armored flying ships, rifle-caliber machine guns will be basically useless against them. Probably your best hopes for attacking them with a conventional airplane would be anachronistic dive bombers or anachronistic heavy rockets - basically WW2-era weapons that were used against naval targets (minus torpedoes, obviously).
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
08-08-2020, 01:20 PM | #30 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Need Zeppelin Data
Quote:
Actually, the newsreel footage is all you need. You can see the skeletal structure of the Hindenburg after its's skin has burnt off in about 30 seconds. The role of the hydrogen-air mix that had leaked out over the voyage may have been more of an accelerant than the main fuel but if it had been replaced by helium that would have served as a dilutant instead of an accelerant. Then after the gasbags have burs the hydrogen rises rapidly and even though it's mostly burning above the Hindenburg rather than inside it there is a large quantity of air being sucked in to replace the rising gas. Helium would have risen rapidly as well but it wouldn't have been self-heating so the process would have been slower.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|