Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2016, 04:05 AM   #31
Phil Masters
 
Phil Masters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by acrosome View Post
Well, what's stopping you from having Soldier (NYPD)? I mean, if Soldier (US Navy) is valid, that would have to be as well.
I really wouldn't specialise Soldier by force. (TL and familiarities are another matter, obviously.) And despite Roger's argument, Soldier or "Sailor" for military sailors still feels like too much skill bloat for me. And "Soldier" for policemen jars with me. (Commander Vimes would certainly have something to say on the matter...)

Quote:
Originally Posted by acrosome View Post
True, the term might be confusing, but so is Machinist/TL0 for flint knapping.
That's more an argument for not calling Flint Knapping "Machinist". Actually, Meteorology/Weather Sense already gives us a precedent for varying skill name by TL...

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
There is! GURPS Mysteries p. 112.
Point. It's there ... as a Professional Skill. Which really reinforces Roger's point about Soldier being better described as an archetypal Pro Skill. The rules it includes for routine equipment use could certainly be generalised across a lot of Pro Skills.
__________________
--
Phil Masters
My Home Page.
My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG.
Phil Masters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 05:03 AM   #32
Polydamas
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Masters View Post
That's more an argument for not calling Flint Knapping "Machinist". Actually, Meteorology/Weather Sense already gives us a precedent for varying skill name by TL...
<snip>

Point. It's there ... as a Professional Skill. Which really reinforces Roger's point about Soldier being better described as an archetypal Pro Skill. The rules it includes for routine equipment use could certainly be generalised across a lot of Pro Skills.
And that shows the problem which you folks face. Soldier is so much more likely to appear on character sheets and be rolled against than other Professional Skills are, so it deserves its own name, but someone in a Stone Age campaign may not know that the skill of making stone tools is under Machinist and Armoury. GURPS gets accused of having too many skills, and of using confusing names (but if they cleared up old mistakes like the name of the Honesty disadvantage, grognards would gripe about that too).
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper

This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature
Polydamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 11:36 AM   #33
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Masters View Post
I really wouldn't specialise Soldier by force. (TL and familiarities are another matter, obviously.)
...How do familiarity penalties interact with the 'only for +4 or easier tasks' standard? Actually, that might be a question about penalties in general. But it seems like familiarity at least is exactly the sort of thing that should be able to shift tasks from allowed to disallowed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Masters View Post
Soldier or "Sailor" for military sailors still feels like too much skill bloat for me.
Civilian ships can have their own eccentric systems that you wouldn't be likely to find on a warship, but probably should roll into their experience of Seamanship.

Admittedly, PCs might find knowing how to work with and around a maritime bulk fish processing system to be a hard bit of knowledge to apply in play, but it's there...
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 11:46 AM   #34
jason taylor
 
jason taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth View Post
...How do familiarity penalties interact with the 'only for +4 or easier tasks' standard? Actually, that might be a question about penalties in general. But it seems like familiarity at least is exactly the sort of thing that should be able to shift tasks from allowed to disallowed.

Civilian ships can have their own eccentric systems that you wouldn't be likely to find on a warship, but probably should roll into their experience of Seamanship.

Admittedly, PCs might find knowing how to work with and around a maritime bulk fish processing system to be a hard bit of knowledge to apply in play, but it's there...
Depends on the time. One time the seas were lawless and all sailors had to be warriors. Or at least had to know how to get out of the way of such.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison
jason taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 11:48 AM   #35
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Masters View Post
I really wouldn't specialise Soldier by force. (TL and familiarities are another matter, obviously.) And despite Roger's argument, Soldier or "Sailor" for military sailors still feels like too much skill bloat for me.
I can't really imagine not giving naval special operators like SEALS Soldier, and I'd probably expect naval combat engineers like the SeaBees to have it too.

Shipboard sailors and aviators? Well maybe. They do go to basic or officer training, and get training on boarding operations with personal weapons. They also learn the kinds of basic military courtesies that everybody else does (more even because of their arcane rating system shibboleths). So they should get an analogous professional skill, which is Seamanship, I think. What's the difference between Seamanship and a "Sailor" skill?
Quote:
And "Soldier" for policemen jars with me. (Commander Vimes would certainly have something to say on the matter...)
As would Joseph Adama. Yeah, I definitely agree that Law Enforcement Officer is the correct skill for law enforcement officers and I'm a little confused why this isn't totally obvious.
Quote:
Point. It's there ... as a Professional Skill. Which really reinforces Roger's point about Soldier being better described as an archetypal Pro Skill. The rules it includes for routine equipment use could certainly be generalised across a lot of Pro Skills.
Yes, I think this too is obvious. Is there any reason to not think Soldier is a professional skill?

Last edited by sir_pudding; 11-10-2016 at 01:17 PM.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 12:52 PM   #36
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

I don't think that training with personal weapons in any way implies the Soldier skill...

SEALs, SeaBees, and various sorts of marines, being substantially trained for soldiering outside any ships they might be attached to, need Soldier. Ship's crews who are taught how to use a gun don't really.

You could run into a bit of a problem if you had, say, elite boarding teams who really deserve the Tactical Shooting combat benefits of Soldier but have basically none of the primary functions of Soldier as they don't operate outside Crewman environments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason taylor View Post
Depends on the time. One time the seas were lawless and all sailors had to be warriors. Or at least had to know how to get out of the way of such.
Accuracy of the statement aside, I'm not sure what your point here is.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.

Last edited by Ulzgoroth; 11-10-2016 at 01:02 PM.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 01:12 PM   #37
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth View Post
I don't think that training with personal weapons in any way implies the Soldier skill...
Yeah that's why I said maybe. Crewman makes more sense. However isn't Crewman for ships Seamanship? That seems a lot like "Sailor" but maybe I'm misreading something. I clarified what I wrote above.

Last edited by sir_pudding; 11-10-2016 at 01:17 PM.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 01:21 PM   #38
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Yeah that's why I said maybe. Crewman makes more sense. However isn't Crewman for ships Seamanship? That seems a lot like "Sailor" but maybe I'm misreading something.
The non-canonical 'Sailor' skill (or rather Professional Skill (Sailor)) talked about here was expressly in addition to the relevant Crewman skill:

"n my space-navy game I use Professional Skill (Sailor) for this purpose, which I should possibly have called something else; it fits alongside Spacer (living aboard ship, basic shipboard tasks) and Savoir-Faire (Military)."

"PS(Sailor) as a Soldier-equivalent is for all the things you get to do in the Navy that aren't spacecraft operation: drill, tactics, personal weapon maintenance, whom to salute and when, which cleaning nanites will get your boots shiny enough but not eat holes through them."
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 01:21 PM   #39
roguebfl
Dog of Lysdexics
 
roguebfl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Yeah that's why I said maybe. Crewman makes more sense. However isn't Crewman for ships Seamanship? That seems a lot like "Sailor" but maybe I'm misreading something. I clarified what I wrote above.
From eariler in the Skill of the week series...
Quote:
Originally Posted by johndallman View Post
Crewman is a family of IQ/E occupational TL skills that provide the ability to serve as part of the crew on a large vehicle, with a separate skill for each vehicle type. [...] They provide familiarity with life aboard, safety measures and damage control, such as patching holes.

The Spaceships series has many examples of using Spacer skill, which generalise to other skills. DF4: Sages has manuals for Seamanship, among many other skills. Thaumatology: Chinese Elemental Powers has some rules for the effects of magically altered environments on Crewman skills and Underground Adventures suggests how you might use Seamanship in place of some applications of Masonry.

The canonical Crewman skills are for airships, surface ships, spaceships and submarines [...]
__________________
Rogue the Bronze Firelizard
Gerald Grenier, Jr. Hail Eris!
Rogue's Weyr
roguebfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2016, 01:24 PM   #40
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Soldier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth View Post
The non-canonical 'Sailor' skill (or rather Professional Skill (Sailor)) talked about here was expressly in addition to the relevant Crewman skill:
Ah yes, okay. I agree that would be skill bloat.

I don't think giving SEALS Soldier is skill bloat though, it probably ought to be a primary skill for a SEAL template...
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
basic, skill of the week, soldier

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.