04-04-2012, 09:47 PM | #1001 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: OK
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
And if I'm going to be dead, I want to be dead. I don't want some computer parading around as me. Quote:
And don't think for a moment that I don't feel empathy with the computer-person, because I do. It's going to hate this legal setup at least as much as I do, but probably more. At least I get the comfort of knowing this is going to be a short fight for me. But this computer creature is potentially facing thousands of years of subjugation under this system until it's accidentally killed. It'd be like living in the Soviet Union forever. I fear for my copies. How would you feel if you woke up one day and got told you were some person you're not, and that you were responsible for things they had done? This is something I'd expect out of bronze age civilizations: creating some new person to be responsible for the sins of the dead. Just think about what you're saying here. You want the law to treat a person that doesn't even exist yet, as you. If you sell yourself into slavery and die, and then they create this new person, it's born a slave. It's a slave because it resembles you. Creating new people to act as slaves. Yeah, maybe I would want my copy to keep on in this world. I'd want it to copy itself a trillion times and do everything it could to put an end to this madness. But I still wouldn't want it/them to claim they're me. Because they're not me. I'd be dead. At least, I think that's the logical outcome of what you're saying you want here. It doesn't look any different to me than having the debts of the parents pass onto their children. And it doesn't have anything at all to do with identity. |
||
04-04-2012, 10:17 PM | #1002 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
|
04-04-2012, 10:23 PM | #1003 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
On the other hand, I don't think that laws that treat the ghost as being you can be made generally workable. If you don't have a prohibition on xoxing—in fact, what amounts to a mandatory death sentence with no appeal for the xox—then you have changed from decisions being made by an individual to decisions being made by what amounts to a partnership with an unlimited number of members, with every partner being bound by every other partner's choices. Do you know about the tragedy of the commons? Bill Stoddard |
|
04-05-2012, 12:06 AM | #1004 | |
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Schleswig, Germany
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
__________________
No unconsenting english phrases were harmed during the writing of this post. |
|
04-05-2012, 12:19 AM | #1005 | |
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Schleswig, Germany
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Please note that I am also not convinced that ghosting does transfer your identity, but that it is a fictional process which would have results that I cannot know now and which would conceptually be impossible to find out. Only I know about my identity and I wouldn´t be around to tell or, if I still could after uploading, sceptics wouldn´t believe me anyway. As long as we don´t have a scientific basis for what identity is and a means to test it, the results of uploading are a matter of speculation.
__________________
No unconsenting english phrases were harmed during the writing of this post. |
|
04-05-2012, 12:30 AM | #1006 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
|
04-05-2012, 12:35 AM | #1007 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
There is also, as I said, the tragedy of the commons issue. We cannot suppose that one copy of you will be altruistically motivated toward the other copies of you. Bill Watterson did a very good Calvin and Hobbes about that issue. Bill Stoddard |
|
04-05-2012, 01:00 AM | #1008 | ||
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Schleswig, Germany
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Quote:
Still, some kind of legal solution resembling inheritance law would probably work smoother - but this one would surely be more interesting. How do all the xoxes organize internally ? Do they form a democracy ? Are they required to form a democracy or can they do as they please ? I think it would be fascinating to explore a situation like that.
__________________
No unconsenting english phrases were harmed during the writing of this post. |
||
04-05-2012, 01:04 AM | #1009 | |||
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: OK
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Think about this example: Right now, I am me. A certain combination of atoms in my brain. You freeze my brain to absolute zero and replace each atom one at a time. You replace the first atom. Still me? The second. Still me? On down the line. As you remove the atoms from my brain, you slowly rebuild my brain with them. Now you have my actual brain, which has been taken apart and put back together. And you have the one that has slowly replaced my brain. Which one is me? Of course, that relies on stuff that's not possible. Remove the absolute zero and your whole thing is now in question. And I don't even know if a brain that's been swiss-cheesed that much could ever be put back together again like it was before. Maybe if you're replacing whole neurons at the same time. But then you need to get those neurons to work just like my original ones. And you're going to have all sorts of problems here, because you're either messing with the brain while it's running or you're shutting it down completely. Either of those is going to screw things up, because the brain is a working device. It's not made to be shut down and restarted like you'd probably want to do here, and if you're replacing stuff while it's running, that's going to mess things up to the point where you might lose identity there. Strap a nuclear bomb to my chest and detonate it and my individual atoms still exist, but their resulting form isn't going to have my identity. I'll tell you that right now. And I think any means of replacing neurons is probably going to result in just about the same thing. Quote:
Quote:
I don't know that this idea of transformation is even relevant to the issue of copying. You can copy a digital person. You can ever copy them and keep the original. And then it's incredibly obvious that they're not the same person. A machine running a copy of my copy on Pluto is not the same entity as the original copy sitting on the front porch in Mississippi. So, even if you could transform me into some sort of cyborg-brained person that could be more easily copied, those copies still won't be 'me.' One's thoughts are not the other's. They exist in different places. They're made from different physical material. One can cease to be while the other carries on. And so on. |
|||
04-05-2012, 02:40 AM | #1010 | ||
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Schleswig, Germany
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Throw those perfect copies into a blender before waking them up, so that no record is kept which one is the original. Now both versions will be convinced that they are you. Or not. Actually, nobody would be able to tell, including themselves! Even you couldn´t tell the difference between being you or just being convinced to be you while being a (nearly) perfect copy. I wonder whether the question of identity actually has any meaning in a thought experiment such as this. And note that you could actually do this with real and self-aware infomorphs in THS! Quote:
__________________
No unconsenting english phrases were harmed during the writing of this post. |
||
Tags |
verhängnisthread |
|
|