04-16-2012, 08:33 AM | #101 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Quote:
The problem si that we;ve got a spell that's a mash-up of "Detect Secret Doors" and "Detect Traps" and people keep wanting to limit it by arbitrary defintions of what those are.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
04-16-2012, 08:43 AM | #102 |
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Belém, Pará, Amazônia, Brasil.
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Intent is the line. And specificity is needed too. general privacy is too broad and not specific. And I didn't get the difference between hidden and concealed.
See details and see secrets seems different to me. A see details spell that don't care about intent would be cool, as a distinct spell, but doesn't seem, to me, to be the best interpretation of the spell as written. If you just see details you see lost items as well. Who wrote this spell, by the way? |
04-16-2012, 08:48 AM | #103 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Obviously it needs a few limitations if otherwise it is going to detect everything anyone ever put away of out of sight without any limit on range or time.
|
04-16-2012, 08:54 AM | #104 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Re: See Secrets spell
If someone looked around my room right now in search of chocolate what should the spell pick up?
1. The chocolate in the draw. Hidden from my girlfriend, surprise chocolates are a man's best friend. 2. The chocolate in the unmarked plastic tub. Their usual container, we both know to look in there for chocolate. 3. The chocolate accidentally put in the chocolate box that normally contains sewing supplies. 4. The chocolate behind the more recently bought biscuits. Edited formatting |
04-16-2012, 10:17 AM | #105 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: See Secrets spell
When the secret is hidden, or when the user's gaze falls on the item, or in any intervening time if using remove aura.
|
04-16-2012, 10:24 AM | #106 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: See Secrets spell
|
04-16-2012, 10:28 AM | #107 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Quote:
If you've been playing with a certain interpretation and you're comfortable with it, then just keep doing what you're doing. Kromm's ruling is the closest you're likely to get to an official one, but that doesn't mean you're forced to accept it *shrug* |
|
04-16-2012, 11:55 AM | #108 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Quote:
1) A man has some gold he wants to keep from casual theives. So he puts it in a safe that's flush with the wall (but clearly visible) and locks it with a key. Is the gold hidden? Is it secret? 2) The man dies and the key is never found. A new owner moves in and doesn't have access to the inside of the safe. Instead of having the safe removed (due to lack of money or whatever), she panels over it so she doesn't have a big honking inaccessible safe she continually will have to answer questions about when entertaining. Is the gold hidden? Is it secret? Is the safe hidden? Is it secret? 3) The woman dies without telling anyone about the safe in her wall. New owner moves in. Never knew the safe was there. Doesn't care for the paneling much, so builds out a new wall on top of the paneling. Is the gold hidden? Is it secret? Is the safe hidden? Is it secret? At which point does the See Secrets spell kick in? |
|
04-16-2012, 12:03 PM | #109 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-16-2012, 12:21 PM | #110 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
|
Re: See Secrets spell
Quote:
|
|
|
|